Grant: Catalyst Grant: Ethics
Unity Health Toronto
$99,544.00
Pan-Canadian Public Consultation Regarding Alternative Consent Models in Adult Emergency Care Research
FY 2015-16
Summary
In order to do research in emergency situations it is sometimes necessary for research teams to use alternative ways to get consent from patients and families. Sometimes this involves enrolling the patient into the study at the time of the event and asking for consent to continue to follow their progress at a later point in time. These alternative approaches have been controversial however no one has ever done a study to understand if in general Canadians would be okay with this kind of research approach or to describe the experience of patients and families who have been in enrolled in this kind of research in order to identify any benefits or issues. We are proposing to look at all of the existing literature, and then to do a cross-Canada survey and in-depth interviews with research participants in order to gain new insight that will help researchers continue to do emergency medicine in a way that is acceptable to patients and families and to help inform Research Ethics Boards decision-making on this type of research.
Department
Program
Catalyst Grant: Ethics
Recipient
Location
Ontario, Canada
Recipient Type
Other
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database
As published
Id
348107
Name
Dainty Katie N
Region
Ontario
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Population and Public Health
Theme2
Social / Cultural / Environmental / Population Health
Prcname2
Catalyst Grant : Ethics (2016-2017)
Projecttitle
Pan-Canadian Public Consultation Regarding Alternative Consent Models in Adult Emergency Care Research
Programtype2
Operating Grants
Orgnameinp2
Unity Health Toronto
Cihramount2
$99,544
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Catalyst Grant: Ethics
Keyworddelim
Health Research Ethics; Multi-Methods; Patient/Family Oriented Research; Public Opinion; Research Consent
Abstract
In order to do research in emergency situations it is sometimes necessary for research teams to use alternative ways to get consent from patients and families. Sometimes this involves enrolling the patient into the study at the time of the event and asking for consent to continue to follow their progress at a later point in time. These alternative approaches have been controversial however no one has ever done a study to understand if in general Canadians would be okay with this kind of research approach or to describe the experience of patients and families who have been in enrolled in this kind of research in order to identify any benefits or issues. We are proposing to look at all of the existing literature, and then to do a cross-Canada survey and in-depth interviews with research participants in order to gain new insight that will help researchers continue to do emergency medicine in a way that is acceptable to patients and families and to help inform Research Ethics Boards decision-making on this type of research.
Competitiondate
201603
Approvedterm2
2 yrs 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Dainty, Katie N
Approvedterm
2 ans 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
~ $99,544~ $0~