Grant: Project Grant
McMaster University
$958,807.00
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Antibiotic Cement Bead Pouch versus Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for the Management of Severe Open Tibia Fracture Wounds
FY 2025-26
Summary
This proposal aims to determine whether an antibiotic bead pouch (bead pouch) or negative pressure wound therapy (wound vac) more effectively prevents infections after surgery for severe open tibia (shin bone) fractures.
Open fractures represent the most severe orthopaedic injuries and can lead to infection in up to 50% of cases where the wound contains large amounts of debris. To prevent infection and support healing, surgeons must thoroughly clean the wound. This may require multiple surgeries before the wound can be closed. When multiple surgeries are needed, there is uncertainty on how the open wound should be managed between procedures. The wound vac is the most common method to temporarily manage these injuries. However, its effectiveness is unclear. Some surgeons instead use the bead pouch. This method has the potential to help prevent infections, reduce the need for intravenous antibiotics, and offer a practical solution in busy hospitals or those with limited resources. A large-scale trial is needed to determine whether the bead pouch leads to better outcomes and should be used more frequently.
The proposed trial is an ongoing international randomized controlled trial of 312 adult patients with severe open tibia fractures. Patients are randomly assigned to receive either bead pouch or wound vac treatment and are followed for 6 months. Over 30 clinical sites across Canada, the United States (US), and the United Kingdom (UK) have been carefully selected to take part. To date, 72 patients have been enrolled. Existing funding supports enrollment of 212 patients in the US. To complete the trial, we require CIHR support to enroll 100 patients at hospitals in Canada and the UK.
This trial has the potential to improve how we treat open tibia fractures by providing surgeons with stronger evidence to guide their decisions. Support from CIHR will help us share these findings more widely and will promote collaboration among experts in orthopaedic trauma care.
Department
Program
Project Grant
Recipient
Location
Ontario, Canada
Recipient Type
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database
As published
Id
534143
Name
Sprague Sheila A
Region
Ontario
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis
Theme2
Clinical
Prcname2
Randomized Controlled Trials 2
Projecttitle
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Antibiotic Cement Bead Pouch versus Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for the Management of Severe Open Tibia Fracture Wounds
Programtype2
Operating Grants
Orgnameinp2
McMaster University
Cihramount2
$958,807
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Project Grant
Keyworddelim
Amputation; Antibiotic Cement Bead Pouch; Clinical Fracture Healing; Evidence-Based Treatment; Infection Prevention; Mortality; Negative Pressure Wound Therapy; Re-Operation; Severe Open Tibia Fracture; Wound Management
Abstract
This proposal aims to determine whether an antibiotic bead pouch (bead pouch) or negative pressure wound therapy (wound vac) more effectively prevents infections after surgery for severe open tibia (shin bone) fractures.
Open fractures represent the most severe orthopaedic injuries and can lead to infection in up to 50% of cases where the wound contains large amounts of debris. To prevent infection and support healing, surgeons must thoroughly clean the wound. This may require multiple surgeries before the wound can be closed. When multiple surgeries are needed, there is uncertainty on how the open wound should be managed between procedures. The wound vac is the most common method to temporarily manage these injuries. However, its effectiveness is unclear. Some surgeons instead use the bead pouch. This method has the potential to help prevent infections, reduce the need for intravenous antibiotics, and offer a practical solution in busy hospitals or those with limited resources. A large-scale trial is needed to determine whether the bead pouch leads to better outcomes and should be used more frequently.
The proposed trial is an ongoing international randomized controlled trial of 312 adult patients with severe open tibia fractures. Patients are randomly assigned to receive either bead pouch or wound vac treatment and are followed for 6 months. Over 30 clinical sites across Canada, the United States (US), and the United Kingdom (UK) have been carefully selected to take part. To date, 72 patients have been enrolled. Existing funding supports enrollment of 212 patients in the US. To complete the trial, we require CIHR support to enroll 100 patients at hospitals in Canada and the UK.
This trial has the potential to improve how we treat open tibia fractures by providing surgeons with stronger evidence to guide their decisions. Support from CIHR will help us share these findings more widely and will promote collaboration among experts in orthopaedic trauma care.
Competitiondate
202509
Approvedterm2
3 yrs 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Sprague, Sheila A; Marchand, Lucas S; Slobogean, Gerard
Approvedterm
3 ans 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
~ $958,807~ $0~