Grant: Collaborative Research and Development Grants
University of British Columbia
$11,000.00
Population dynamics of wine yeast during spontaneous and guided fermentations and the expression of stress genes as affected by interactions between different strains of yeasts.
FY 2015-16
Summary
Primary fermentation, which is responsible for ethanol production, is mainly conducted by different strains of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae. At an operational scale, primary fermentation is conducted in large tanks, which
involves using either spontaneous or guided fermentation. In spontaneous fermentation, the must is exposed to
the resident yeast population, whereas in guided fermentation, a commercially available S. cerevisiae yeast
starter or active dry yeast (ADY) strain is added. Our spontaneous fermentation studies, conducted on a Pinot
Noir variety at Quails' Gate Estate Winery (QGEW) in British Columbia, Canada show that ADY strains are
the dominant strains fermenting Pinot Noir must, as opposed to indigenous yeast strains. These findings are in
contrast to those from traditional wine-producing regions where indigenous yeast strains tend to dominate. We
also showed, at the end of guided fermentation, that the inoculant, ADY strain Lalvinr RC212, was equally
dominant with a contaminant ADY strain Lalvinr ICV-D254. This data supports recent traditional wine
region findings that multiple strains of S. cerevisiae are often present in guided fermentations. However, in
traditional wine regions, contaminant strains tend to be indigenous strains, whereas in our studies, they are
comprised of relatively aggressive ADY strains. Our results point to the idea that North American wineries are
unique, in that ADY stains dominate spontaneous and guided fermentations and that S. cerevisiae contaminants
of guided fermentation tend to be ADY and not indigenous stains. This proposed research program, with
respect to yeast strain dynamics and their expression of stress genes in fermenting wine, will help to determine
whether this uniqueness is valid by expanding our knowledge to multiple North American wineries. Our main
objectives are to: 1) compare yeast strain dynamics of wine between different years, wineries, and stages of
fermentation; 2) compare the total yeast community between different stages of fermentation; 3) determine the
source of ADY yeast stains in guided and spontaneous fermentations; and 4) compare the expression of stress
genes from yeasts, which are subjected to and not subjected to competition from other ADY strains.
Program
Collaborative Research and Development Grants
Recipient
Location
British Columbia, Canada
Recipient Type
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
NSERC's Awards Data
As published
Application id
406796-2010
Name nom
Durall, Daniel
Department département
Okanagan - Biology
Organization id
2
Institution établissement
University of British Columbia
Province en
British Columbia
Province fr
Colombie-Britannique
Country en
CANADA
Country fr
CANADA
Fiscal year exercice financier
2015
Competition year année de concours
2010
Award amount
11000
Program id
CRDPJ
Program name en
Collaborative Research and Development Grants
Program name fr
Subventions de recherche et développement coopérative
Group en
Research partnerships programs
Group fr
Programmes de partenariat
Committee code
96
Committee name en
RPP Internal Decision Cttee
Committee name fr
Cté de décision interne - PPR
Area of application code
501
Area of application group en
Manufacturing processes and products
Area of application group fr
Procédés et produits industriels
Area of application en
Processed food products and beverages
Area of application fr
Aliments transformés et boissons
Research subject code
5200
Research subject group en
Microbiology
Research subject group fr
Microbiologie
Research subject en
Microbiology
Research subject fr
Microbiologie
Partie
5
Nb partie
5
Application title
Population dynamics of wine yeast during spontaneous and guided fermentations and the expression of stress genes as affected by interactions between different strains of yeasts.
Keyword
NSERC
Application summary
Primary fermentation, which is responsible for ethanol production, is mainly conducted by different strains of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae. At an operational scale, primary fermentation is conducted in large tanks, which
involves using either spontaneous or guided fermentation. In spontaneous fermentation, the must is exposed to
the resident yeast population, whereas in guided fermentation, a commercially available S. cerevisiae yeast
starter or active dry yeast (ADY) strain is added. Our spontaneous fermentation studies, conducted on a Pinot
Noir variety at Quails' Gate Estate Winery (QGEW) in British Columbia, Canada show that ADY strains are
the dominant strains fermenting Pinot Noir must, as opposed to indigenous yeast strains. These findings are in
contrast to those from traditional wine-producing regions where indigenous yeast strains tend to dominate. We
also showed, at the end of guided fermentation, that the inoculant, ADY strain Lalvinr RC212, was equally
dominant with a contaminant ADY strain Lalvinr ICV-D254. This data supports recent traditional wine
region findings that multiple strains of S. cerevisiae are often present in guided fermentations. However, in
traditional wine regions, contaminant strains tend to be indigenous strains, whereas in our studies, they are
comprised of relatively aggressive ADY strains. Our results point to the idea that North American wineries are
unique, in that ADY stains dominate spontaneous and guided fermentations and that S. cerevisiae contaminants
of guided fermentation tend to be ADY and not indigenous stains. This proposed research program, with
respect to yeast strain dynamics and their expression of stress genes in fermenting wine, will help to determine
whether this uniqueness is valid by expanding our knowledge to multiple North American wineries. Our main
objectives are to: 1) compare yeast strain dynamics of wine between different years, wineries, and stages of
fermentation; 2) compare the total yeast community between different stages of fermentation; 3) determine the
source of ADY yeast stains in guided and spontaneous fermentations; and 4) compare the expression of stress
genes from yeasts, which are subjected to and not subjected to competition from other ADY strains.