Grant: Project Grant - Priority Announcement: Patient-Oriented Research
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
$100,000.00
The Canadian Prehabilitation Network Review: a living systematic review to support advanced knowledge synthesis informing prehabilitation design and evaluation
FY 2025-26
Summary
Over half a million Canadians have major surgery (like joint replacements, heart or cancer operations) yearly. Surgery stresses peoples' bodies, much like running a marathon. Unlike runners, who train a lot for their race, most Canadians are not actively preparing for surgery.
This means that they may not be in the best possible shape for surgery and may suffer from complications, long hospital stays, or even die. Effective strategies to better prepare people for major surgery are needed.
Prehabilitation means preparing for surgery through exercise, nutrition and/or stress management. People are very interested in prehabilitation because it makes sense that preparing people's minds and bodies for surgery will lead to better experiences and outcomes. Unfortunately, research has not always shown these benefits; we think this is because different types of patients need different types of prehabilitation. If we can understand what patient characteristics and what types of prehabilitation programs work best,
we can use healthcare resources wisely, use patients' time wisely, and make sure the right patient receives the right care before surgery. We can also direct new research efforts toward the most promising programs and under-served patients.
So far, hundreds of individual studies of prehabilitation have been completed, but they have not provided solid answers to questions that matter to patients and clinicians. When research studies have conflicting findings, systematic reviews are important to sort out the reasons why. We will create a long term systematic review that is constantly bringing in newly published studies and use these pooled data to determine: 1) what types of prehabilitation are
most effective, 2) what types of patients may benefit most from prehabilitation, and 3) what types of programs and patient factors lead to the highest levels of participation and response.
Department
Program
Project Grant - Priority Announcement: Patient-Oriented Research
Recipient
Location
Ontario, Canada
Recipient Type
Other
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database
As published
Id
555298
Name
McIsaac Daniel I
Region
Ontario
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Health Services and Policy Research
Theme2
Health systems / services
Prcname2
Health Services Evaluation & Interventions Research 3
Projecttitle
The Canadian Prehabilitation Network Review: a living systematic review to support advanced knowledge synthesis informing prehabilitation design and evaluation
Programtype2
Operating Grants
Orgnameinp2
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Cihramount2
$100,000
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Project Grant - Priority Announcement: Patient-Oriented Research
Keyworddelim
Exercise; Health Policy; Integrated Knowledge Translation; Network Review; Nutrition; Outcomes; Prehabilitation; Surgery; Systematic Review
Abstract
Over half a million Canadians have major surgery (like joint replacements, heart or cancer operations) yearly. Surgery stresses peoples' bodies, much like running a marathon. Unlike runners, who train a lot for their race, most Canadians are not actively preparing for surgery.
This means that they may not be in the best possible shape for surgery and may suffer from complications, long hospital stays, or even die. Effective strategies to better prepare people for major surgery are needed.
Prehabilitation means preparing for surgery through exercise, nutrition and/or stress management. People are very interested in prehabilitation because it makes sense that preparing people's minds and bodies for surgery will lead to better experiences and outcomes. Unfortunately, research has not always shown these benefits; we think this is because different types of patients need different types of prehabilitation. If we can understand what patient characteristics and what types of prehabilitation programs work best,
we can use healthcare resources wisely, use patients' time wisely, and make sure the right patient receives the right care before surgery. We can also direct new research efforts toward the most promising programs and under-served patients.
So far, hundreds of individual studies of prehabilitation have been completed, but they have not provided solid answers to questions that matter to patients and clinicians. When research studies have conflicting findings, systematic reviews are important to sort out the reasons why. We will create a long term systematic review that is constantly bringing in newly published studies and use these pooled data to determine: 1) what types of prehabilitation are
most effective, 2) what types of patients may benefit most from prehabilitation, and 3) what types of programs and patient factors lead to the highest levels of participation and response.
Competitiondate
202509
Approvedterm2
1 yr 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
McIsaac, Daniel I; Boland, Laura S; Gillis, Chelsia A; Hutton, Brian E; Kidd, Gurlavine D; Martel, Guillaume; Veroniki, Areti Angeliki
Approvedterm
1 an 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
~ $100,000~ $0~