Canada Spends Logo

Explore our Budget 2026 analysis

Grant: Project Grant

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

$401,625.00

Effects of an Open Lung protective protective EXTubation strategy compared to a conventional extubation strategy on postoperative pulmonary complications after general anesthesia as part of a comprehensive lung protective ventilation strategy: a multicenter pilot randomized controlled trial (OLEXT-3 study)

FY 2022-23

Summary
Respiratory complications (e.g., pneumonia, lung collapse) after general anesthesia are frequent (10-40%). While many of them will have little or no impact on patients, others can lead to a prolonged hospitalisation, an unplanned need for treatment in an intensive care unit, or death. A number of studies have investigated whether delivering oxygen to patients using different mechanical ventilator settings may decrease the number of respiratory complications. These studies report variable and contradictory effects. Most surgeries are performed under general anesthesia during which a breathing tube is placed in patients' lungs by their anesthesiologist. Removing that tube (extubation) is a very common procedure for anesthesiologists in their daily clinical practice. Research suggests that a properly performed extubation may be an important step to decrease respiratory complications after general anesthesia. Surprisingly, very little research is available to help anesthesiologists decide how best to perform extubation. This trial will test a simple strategy of keeping the lungs fully opened during extubation instead of letting them partially collapse. This trial will be conducted in four different Canadian hospitals. Patients undergoing surgery inside their abdomen will be randomly assigned to the usual conventional approach to safe extubation (partial lung collapse) or to receive a new approach to safe extubation (keeping lungs fully opened). This small pilot trial will test whether it is feasible to organise a bigger trial evaluating whether a strategy to keep the lungs fully open is superior to a strategy of letting the lungs partially collapse to reduce respiratory complications after general anesthesia.
Program
Project Grant
Location
Quebec, Canada
Recipient Type
Not-for-profit organization or charity
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database

As published

Id
479975
Name
Girard Martin
Region
Québec
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Circulatory and Respiratory Health
Theme2
Clinical
Prcname2
Randomized Controlled Trials 2
Projecttitle
Effects of an Open Lung protective protective EXTubation strategy compared to a conventional extubation strategy on postoperative pulmonary complications after general anesthesia as part of a comprehensive lung protective ventilation strategy: a multicenter pilot randomized controlled trial (OLEXT-3 study)
Programtype2
Operating Grants
Orgnameinp2
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Cihramount2
$401,625
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Project Grant
Keyworddelim
Extubation; General Anesthesia; Lung-Protective Ventilation; Postoperative Pulmonary Complications
Abstract
Respiratory complications (e.g., pneumonia, lung collapse) after general anesthesia are frequent (10-40%). While many of them will have little or no impact on patients, others can lead to a prolonged hospitalisation, an unplanned need for treatment in an intensive care unit, or death. A number of studies have investigated whether delivering oxygen to patients using different mechanical ventilator settings may decrease the number of respiratory complications. These studies report variable and contradictory effects. Most surgeries are performed under general anesthesia during which a breathing tube is placed in patients' lungs by their anesthesiologist. Removing that tube (extubation) is a very common procedure for anesthesiologists in their daily clinical practice. Research suggests that a properly performed extubation may be an important step to decrease respiratory complications after general anesthesia. Surprisingly, very little research is available to help anesthesiologists decide how best to perform extubation. This trial will test a simple strategy of keeping the lungs fully opened during extubation instead of letting them partially collapse. This trial will be conducted in four different Canadian hospitals. Patients undergoing surgery inside their abdomen will be randomly assigned to the usual conventional approach to safe extubation (partial lung collapse) or to receive a new approach to safe extubation (keeping lungs fully opened). This small pilot trial will test whether it is feasible to organise a bigger trial evaluating whether a strategy to keep the lungs fully open is superior to a strategy of letting the lungs partially collapse to reduce respiratory complications after general anesthesia.
Competitiondate
202303
Approvedterm2
1 yr 6 mths
Pinamesdelim
Girard, Martin; Chasse, Michael
Approvedterm
1 an 6 mois
Cihrcontribution2
~ $401,625~ $0~