Canada Spends Logo

Explore our Budget 2026 analysis

Grant: Travel Awards - Institute Community Support

McGill University

$1,000.00

Role of vision and haptic feedback on reaching accuracy in subjects with chronic stroke

FY 2015-16

Summary
Making precise reaching movements with the arm is commonly affected as we get older and after stroke. Our research is based on the idea that problems in making reaching movements are related to changes how we use visual and other sensory information. The goal of this study was to identify the role of vision and touch on the accuracy of pointing in older people and in people with stroke. For the purpose of this project, older participants and participants with stroke performed two sequences of 10 movements each with each arm. The movement was performed by alternatively touching the tip of the nose (ReachIn direction) and a target (ReachOut direction) placed at 90% arm-length, as fast as possible. The task was performed under four different conditions: a) eyes open touching the target, b) eyes closed, touching the target, c) eyes open, not touching the target, and d) eyes closed, not touching the target. We used a motion capture system (Optotrak system) to reconstruct and measure the movements of the arms and trunk. With both vision and touch, subjects with stroke made more curved and less precise reaching movements compared to controls. Movement precision was lower with eyes closed compared to eyes open and without touch compared to with touch in both groups. Subjects with stroke had larger errors (lower precision) than controls without vision and without touch. Movement accuracy was worse when movements were performed towards the target (ReachOut direction) compared to when they were performed towards the nose (ReachIn direction) in both groups in all 4 conditions. Absence of vision and tactile feedback diminished task performance more in stroke compared to control individuals. The results of this study will inform practitioners about the extent to which the disruption of the task is related to the integrity of vision and touch.
Program
Travel Awards - Institute Community Support
Location
Quebec, Canada
Recipient Type
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database

As published

Id
346455
Name
Rodrigues Marcos R
Region
Québec
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Aging
Theme2
Clinical
Prcname2
Institute of Aging
Projecttitle
Role of vision and haptic feedback on reaching accuracy in subjects with chronic stroke
Programtype2
Undefined
Orgnameinp2
McGill University
Cihramount2
$1,000
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Travel Awards - Institute Community Support
Keyworddelim
Coordination; Haptic Feedback; Ics Travel Awards; Motor Control; Stroke; Upper-Extremity; Vision
Abstract
Making precise reaching movements with the arm is commonly affected as we get older and after stroke. Our research is based on the idea that problems in making reaching movements are related to changes how we use visual and other sensory information. The goal of this study was to identify the role of vision and touch on the accuracy of pointing in older people and in people with stroke. For the purpose of this project, older participants and participants with stroke performed two sequences of 10 movements each with each arm. The movement was performed by alternatively touching the tip of the nose (ReachIn direction) and a target (ReachOut direction) placed at 90% arm-length, as fast as possible. The task was performed under four different conditions: a) eyes open touching the target, b) eyes closed, touching the target, c) eyes open, not touching the target, and d) eyes closed, not touching the target. We used a motion capture system (Optotrak system) to reconstruct and measure the movements of the arms and trunk. With both vision and touch, subjects with stroke made more curved and less precise reaching movements compared to controls. Movement precision was lower with eyes closed compared to eyes open and without touch compared to with touch in both groups. Subjects with stroke had larger errors (lower precision) than controls without vision and without touch. Movement accuracy was worse when movements were performed towards the target (ReachOut direction) compared to when they were performed towards the nose (ReachIn direction) in both groups in all 4 conditions. Absence of vision and tactile feedback diminished task performance more in stroke compared to control individuals. The results of this study will inform practitioners about the extent to which the disruption of the task is related to the integrity of vision and touch.
Competitiondate
201601
Approvedterm2
1 yr 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Rodrigues, Marcos R
Approvedterm
1 an 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
Institute of Aging~ $1,000~ $0~
McGill University - $1,000 Grant (2015-16) | Canada Spends