Grant: Discovery Grants Program - Individual
Queen's University
$72,000.00
Determining the mechanism of muscular co-contraction on motor function
FY 2024-25
Summary
People use muscular co-contraction when interacting with unstable environments. Why? It is thought that co-contraction prepares the body to instantly counter unexpected disturbances by increasing muscle stiffness, like an elastic resisting stretch. If this were true we would see instant differences in motion following a disturbance when co-contracting. However, my recent work only shows differences after 50ms when the neural system can contribute. This highlights that there is poor mechanistic understanding of how muscular co-contraction aids motor performance. The objective of this proposal is to understand how muscle co-contraction impacts neural and mechanical features of the motor system to improve performance.
Project 1: Impact of limb properties and co-contraction on motor corrections
This project will demonstrate that contributions of co-contraction to improving motor performance and includes neural control. To do this we will compare limb control following a mechanical perturbation applied to the elbow in 1) relaxed vs. co-contracted conditions, 2) countering unidirectional background loads vs. co-contracted conditions, and 3) when relaxed but simulating co-contraction by increasing elbow stiffness/viscosity using a Kinarm Exoskeleton Robot.
Project 2: Link between co-contraction and spinal feedback
We hypothesize that spinal feedback responses are augmented when co-contracting, improving limb control. We will compare spinal feedback responses following perturbations to the elbow across co-contracted, relaxed and opposing background load conditions. Additionally, we will quantify how this augmented spinal response at high levels of co-contraction may lead to detrimental performance.
Project 3: Tasks that naturally elicit co-contraction
To determine the robustness of co-contraction improving limb control we will quantify its performance benefits when it is naturally evoked, opposed to when participants voluntarily co-contract (as in Projects 1&2). We will develop tasks to naturally evoke co-contraction, and once deemed reliable we will apply mechanical disturbances and measure reactive responses. Additionally, we will investigate performance benefits of co-contraction in non-mechanical scenarios requiring rapid motor responses.
Project 4: Generalizing co-contraction benefits across the body
Finally, we will investigate the benefits of co-contraction when disturbances are applied to the hands and feet (disturbances only applied to elbow joint in Projects 1&2). This will better replicate the real-world where co-contraction is used when working with tools or walking on slippery surfaces.
This work will provide a mechanistic understanding of how co-contraction improves motor performance, involving not only changes in muscle properties but also in altering neural control. These findings will inform application-based research and design for exposures to unstable environments, or to assess a range of neurological impairments.
Program
Discovery Grants Program - Individual
Recipient
Location
Ontario, Canada
Recipient Type
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
NSERC's Awards Data
As published
Application id
RGPIN-2024-04486
Name nom
Scott, Stephen
Department département
Centre for Neuroscience Studies
Organization id
29
Institution établissement
Queen's University
Province en
Ontario
Province fr
Ontario
Country en
CANADA
Country fr
CANADA
Fiscal year exercice financier
2024
Competition year année de concours
2024
Award amount
72000
Program id
RGPIN
Program name en
Discovery Grants Program - Individual
Program name fr
Programme de subventions à la découverte - individuelles
Group en
DISCOVERY RESEARCH
Group fr
RECHERCHE AXÉE SUR LA DÉCOUVERTE
Committee code
1502
Committee name en
Biological Systems and Functions
Committee name fr
Systèmes et fonctions biologiques
Area of application code
1101
Area of application group en
Health, education and social services
Area of application group fr
Santé publique, éducation et services sociaux
Area of application en
Human health (including medically-related psychological research)
Area of application fr
Santé publique (y compris recherche psychologique liée à la médecine)
Research subject code
9000
Research subject group en
Medical sciences
Research subject group fr
Sciences médicales
Research subject en
Medical sciences
Research subject fr
Sciences médicales
Field of research list names en
Not available
Field of research list names fr
Non disponible
Socioeconomic objective list names en
Not available
Socioeconomic objective list names fr
Non disponible
Application title
Determining the mechanism of muscular co-contraction on motor function
Keywords
motor control; sensory feedback; interactive robotics; arm movement and postural control; mechanical perturbation; visual perturbation; electromyography; muscle co-contraction; short-range stiffness; muscle impedance
Application summary
People use muscular co-contraction when interacting with unstable environments. Why? It is thought that co-contraction prepares the body to instantly counter unexpected disturbances by increasing muscle stiffness, like an elastic resisting stretch. If this were true we would see instant differences in motion following a disturbance when co-contracting. However, my recent work only shows differences after 50ms when the neural system can contribute. This highlights that there is poor mechanistic understanding of how muscular co-contraction aids motor performance. The objective of this proposal is to understand how muscle co-contraction impacts neural and mechanical features of the motor system to improve performance.
Project 1: Impact of limb properties and co-contraction on motor corrections
This project will demonstrate that contributions of co-contraction to improving motor performance and includes neural control. To do this we will compare limb control following a mechanical perturbation applied to the elbow in 1) relaxed vs. co-contracted conditions, 2) countering unidirectional background loads vs. co-contracted conditions, and 3) when relaxed but simulating co-contraction by increasing elbow stiffness/viscosity using a Kinarm Exoskeleton Robot.
Project 2: Link between co-contraction and spinal feedback
We hypothesize that spinal feedback responses are augmented when co-contracting, improving limb control. We will compare spinal feedback responses following perturbations to the elbow across co-contracted, relaxed and opposing background load conditions. Additionally, we will quantify how this augmented spinal response at high levels of co-contraction may lead to detrimental performance.
Project 3: Tasks that naturally elicit co-contraction
To determine the robustness of co-contraction improving limb control we will quantify its performance benefits when it is naturally evoked, opposed to when participants voluntarily co-contract (as in Projects 1&2). We will develop tasks to naturally evoke co-contraction, and once deemed reliable we will apply mechanical disturbances and measure reactive responses. Additionally, we will investigate performance benefits of co-contraction in non-mechanical scenarios requiring rapid motor responses.
Project 4: Generalizing co-contraction benefits across the body
Finally, we will investigate the benefits of co-contraction when disturbances are applied to the hands and feet (disturbances only applied to elbow joint in Projects 1&2). This will better replicate the real-world where co-contraction is used when working with tools or walking on slippery surfaces.
This work will provide a mechanistic understanding of how co-contraction improves motor performance, involving not only changes in muscle properties but also in altering neural control. These findings will inform application-based research and design for exposures to unstable environments, or to assess a range of neurological impairments.