Grant: Planning and Dissemination Grant - Institute Community Support
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
$25,000.00
Structuring Patient-Oriented Research: Developing a National Agenda in Patient Care Research and Evaluation.
FY 2013-14
Summary
Critical care is essential to the Canadian healthcare system but it is very resource intensive. Its enormous human and financial cost underscores the pressing need for high quality evidence on effectiveness, an important aspect of quality care encompassing efficacy and cost. In Canada, up to 25 percent of all hospital deaths occur in critical units. Even if one survives, there is sustained physical, cognitive and emotional disability among survivors. Families and care givers also experience significant psychological trauma during protracted recovery periods. The spectrum of patients requiring critical care services is extremely wide and ranges from those with life threatening complications of medical illnesses to those precipitated by elective surgical interventions, trauma, cancer, neurological diseases and psychiatric illnesses. Critical care consumes extraordinary health care resources. In Canada, ICU costs are estimated to account for 16 percent of hospital charges; in 2004 this was 6 billion of the 39 billion dollars spent on hospital services. A broad and rigorous Quality of Care research agenda and evaluation is imperative to reduce morbidity, to increase survival and to improve the quality of life of patients and families while keeping in view sustainability. Canada's Critical Care community must develop a comprehensive quality of care agenda to achieve transformative changes. Care of the critically ill is complex, multidisciplinary and expensive. Albeit errors are not more frequent in the critical care setting, their consequences are more often dramatic owing to the extreme vulnerability of the patients. Currently, efforts to develop and implement quality indicators for critical care are not coordinated on a national level. We propose to establish a rigorous approach to setting national goals with long term achievable targets for improvements and benchmarks of meaningful measures to assist in monitoring our progress.
Department
Program
Planning and Dissemination Grant - Institute Community Support
Location
Quebec, Canada
Recipient Type
Not-for-profit organization or charity
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database
As published
Id
308041
Name
Hebert Paul C
Region
Québec
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Circulatory and Respiratory Health
Theme2
Clinical
Prcname2
Planning and Dissemination - ICRH
Projecttitle
Structuring Patient-Oriented Research: Developing a National Agenda in Patient Care Research and Evaluation.
Programtype2
Miscellaneous Programs
Orgnameinp2
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Cihramount2
$25,000
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Planning and Dissemination Grant - Institute Community Support
Keyworddelim
Adult Critical Care; Clinical Trials; Critical Care; Pediatric Critical Care; Quality Of Care; Trauma
Abstract
Critical care is essential to the Canadian healthcare system but it is very resource intensive. Its enormous human and financial cost underscores the pressing need for high quality evidence on effectiveness, an important aspect of quality care encompassing efficacy and cost. In Canada, up to 25 percent of all hospital deaths occur in critical units. Even if one survives, there is sustained physical, cognitive and emotional disability among survivors. Families and care givers also experience significant psychological trauma during protracted recovery periods. The spectrum of patients requiring critical care services is extremely wide and ranges from those with life threatening complications of medical illnesses to those precipitated by elective surgical interventions, trauma, cancer, neurological diseases and psychiatric illnesses. Critical care consumes extraordinary health care resources. In Canada, ICU costs are estimated to account for 16 percent of hospital charges; in 2004 this was 6 billion of the 39 billion dollars spent on hospital services. A broad and rigorous Quality of Care research agenda and evaluation is imperative to reduce morbidity, to increase survival and to improve the quality of life of patients and families while keeping in view sustainability. Canada's Critical Care community must develop a comprehensive quality of care agenda to achieve transformative changes. Care of the critically ill is complex, multidisciplinary and expensive. Albeit errors are not more frequent in the critical care setting, their consequences are more often dramatic owing to the extreme vulnerability of the patients. Currently, efforts to develop and implement quality indicators for critical care are not coordinated on a national level. We propose to establish a rigorous approach to setting national goals with long term achievable targets for improvements and benchmarks of meaningful measures to assist in monitoring our progress.
Competitiondate
201402
Approvedterm2
1 yr 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Hebert, Paul C
Approvedterm
1 an 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
Inst of Circ &Respiratory Hlth~ $25,000~ $0~