Grant: Operating Grant: SPOR PIHCI Network - Knowledge Synthesis Grants
Unity Health Toronto
$24,986.00
Evaluating the comparative effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment for improving patient and healthcare system outcomes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
FY 2016-17
Summary
Caring for older adults with complex health needs remains a challenge in primary care. Approximately, 67% of older adults have 2 or more chronic conditions and account for 25% of all primary care visits. They see several clinicians, take multiple medications, and are exposed to drug-disease interactions and uncoordinated care, leading to reduced function and quality of life. Integrated care models like comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGAs) can manage complex health needs of older adults. CGAs focus on diagnosing and managing multiple conditions, and involve collaboration with a geriatrician and a care team.
Research indicates that those who receive CGAs are more likely to remain in their homes, have lower mortality risk and improved cognition compared to usual care. However, the different models have not been compared to each other and it is unclear which is most effective.
We propose to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to identify the most effective model of CGA (geriatrician-led care models) in primary care for improving patient (e.g., quality of life) and system outcomes (e.g., admission to long term care). We will use an approach where knowledge users (KUs) such as patients, caregivers, clinicians, and policymakers are involved throughout. Outcomes will be selected by KUs to ensure results are relevant to their decision making. We will use NMA, a statistical method, to compare and rank the different care models. Results will be discussed with KUs and key findings created to inform dissemination strategies.
Involving KUs in selecting outcomes and developing key messages will promote uptake of results and inform healthcare decision making. Our KUs include those in Ontario, Alberta and Saskatchewan, who are making decisions about how to target clinical activities to optimize care of older adults. Ultimately, the results will lead to improved care for older patients through identification of optimal care models.
Department
Program
Operating Grant: SPOR PIHCI Network - Knowledge Synthesis Grants
Recipient
Location
Ontario, Canada
Recipient Type
Other
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database
As published
Id
352561
Name
Straus Sharon E
Region
Ontario
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Aging
Theme2
Clinical
Prcname2
SPOR PIHCI Network - Knowledge Synthesis Grants
Projecttitle
Evaluating the comparative effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment for improving patient and healthcare system outcomes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
Programtype2
Operating Grants
Orgnameinp2
Unity Health Toronto
Cihramount2
$24,986
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Operating Grant: SPOR PIHCI Network - Knowledge Synthesis Grants
Keyworddelim
Care Models; Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment; Geriatric Medicine; Integrated Care; Network Meta-Analysis; Primary Care; Systematic Review
Abstract
Caring for older adults with complex health needs remains a challenge in primary care. Approximately, 67% of older adults have 2 or more chronic conditions and account for 25% of all primary care visits. They see several clinicians, take multiple medications, and are exposed to drug-disease interactions and uncoordinated care, leading to reduced function and quality of life. Integrated care models like comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGAs) can manage complex health needs of older adults. CGAs focus on diagnosing and managing multiple conditions, and involve collaboration with a geriatrician and a care team.
Research indicates that those who receive CGAs are more likely to remain in their homes, have lower mortality risk and improved cognition compared to usual care. However, the different models have not been compared to each other and it is unclear which is most effective.
We propose to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to identify the most effective model of CGA (geriatrician-led care models) in primary care for improving patient (e.g., quality of life) and system outcomes (e.g., admission to long term care). We will use an approach where knowledge users (KUs) such as patients, caregivers, clinicians, and policymakers are involved throughout. Outcomes will be selected by KUs to ensure results are relevant to their decision making. We will use NMA, a statistical method, to compare and rank the different care models. Results will be discussed with KUs and key findings created to inform dissemination strategies.
Involving KUs in selecting outcomes and developing key messages will promote uptake of results and inform healthcare decision making. Our KUs include those in Ontario, Alberta and Saskatchewan, who are making decisions about how to target clinical activities to optimize care of older adults. Ultimately, the results will lead to improved care for older patients through identification of optimal care models.
Competitiondate
201607
Approvedterm2
1 yr 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Straus, Sharon E; Basran, Jenny F; Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna M; Liu, Barbara; Armson, Heather A; Goodridge, Donna M; Tricco, Andrea C
Approvedterm
1 an 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
~ $24,986~ $0~