Grant: Operating Grant
Toronto Metropolitan University
$161,980.00
Development and Assessment of an Instrument for Evaluating Public and Patient Involvement in Resource Allocation Decisions
FY 2013-14
Summary
Objectives: Involving the public and patients (P&P) in resource allocation decisions is common in Canada however methods to measure the effectiveness of their involvement have not been developed. We will refine and test a new instrument to measure P&P involvement in resource allocation decisions. Background: P&P involvement in resource allocation committees is important because it addresses fundamental democratic principles regarding how decisions should be made and who should make them. Our research has shown that the objectives of P&P involvement in Canadian public drug resource allocation decision making are often unclear to stakeholders, committee members, and policy makers. Consequently, evaluation of such involvement has not occurred. Research Plan: To date, we interviewed key stakeholders, completed a literature review and reviewed drug resource allocation committee documents to develop a model for understanding the purpose, roles, responsibilities, and resources for P&P involvement. We used this model to develop nine objectives for judging the effectiveness of P&P involvement. This will form the basis of our instrument. Our next steps are to refine and assess the instrument. We plan on refining the instrument by reviewing the preliminary items with our knowledge user partner, the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), to ensure that no domains are missing. We will conduct item reduction of our instrument using stakeholder focus groups. We will revise the instrument according to the feedback from stakeholders and CADTH. We also will assess the instrument's sensibility, validity and test-retest reliability. Relevance: Meaningful P&P involvement in public resource allocation decisions is important for establishing effective democratic decision making mechanisms. Our instrument is relevant for decision-makers who are addressing issues of prioritization within constrained budgets while ensuring accountability to Canadians.
Department
Program
Operating Grant
Recipient
Location
Ontario, Canada
Recipient Type
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database
As published
Id
306467
Name
Rosenberg-Yunger Zahava R
Region
Ontario
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Health Services and Policy Research
Theme2
Health systems / services
Prcname2
Health Policy & Systems Management Research
Projecttitle
Development and Assessment of an Instrument for Evaluating Public and Patient Involvement in Resource Allocation Decisions
Programtype2
Operating Grants
Orgnameinp2
Toronto Metropolitan University
Cihramount2
$161,980
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Operating Grant
Keyworddelim
Drug Policy; Instrument Development; Mixed-Methods Design; Resource Allocation
Abstract
Objectives: Involving the public and patients (P&P) in resource allocation decisions is common in Canada however methods to measure the effectiveness of their involvement have not been developed. We will refine and test a new instrument to measure P&P involvement in resource allocation decisions. Background: P&P involvement in resource allocation committees is important because it addresses fundamental democratic principles regarding how decisions should be made and who should make them. Our research has shown that the objectives of P&P involvement in Canadian public drug resource allocation decision making are often unclear to stakeholders, committee members, and policy makers. Consequently, evaluation of such involvement has not occurred. Research Plan: To date, we interviewed key stakeholders, completed a literature review and reviewed drug resource allocation committee documents to develop a model for understanding the purpose, roles, responsibilities, and resources for P&P involvement. We used this model to develop nine objectives for judging the effectiveness of P&P involvement. This will form the basis of our instrument. Our next steps are to refine and assess the instrument. We plan on refining the instrument by reviewing the preliminary items with our knowledge user partner, the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), to ensure that no domains are missing. We will conduct item reduction of our instrument using stakeholder focus groups. We will revise the instrument according to the feedback from stakeholders and CADTH. We also will assess the instrument's sensibility, validity and test-retest reliability. Relevance: Meaningful P&P involvement in public resource allocation decisions is important for establishing effective democratic decision making mechanisms. Our instrument is relevant for decision-makers who are addressing issues of prioritization within constrained budgets while ensuring accountability to Canadians.
Competitiondate
201403
Approvedterm2
3 yrs 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Rosenberg-Yunger, Zahava R
Approvedterm
3 ans 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
~ $161,980~ $0~