Canada Spends Logo

Explore our Budget 2026 analysis

Grant: Doctoral Research Award - Priority Announcement: Patient-Oriented Research

Concordia University (Montreal, Quebec)

$70,000.00

An examination of distraction use in exposure therapy for anxiety

FY 2012-13

Summary
Anxiety disorders are among the most common mental illnesses. The most effective treatment for anxiety disorders is cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT); however, treatment refusal and drop-out rates are high. Exposure, an effective component of CBT, involves gradually exposing oneself to a feared stimuli or situation to habituate to symptoms of anxiety. Although exposure is effective, many clients are unwilling to complete exposures, or refuse treatment due to fear of exposures. Thus, improving the acceptability of exposure may increase treatment acceptance and reduce drop-outs. The current study proposes the use of distraction during exposure to make it more acceptable to clients. There have been mixed findings regarding the impact of distraction use on treatment outcome; thus, it is important to evaluate factors may play a role in whether distraction will aid or interfere with exposure. Specifically, the type of distraction strategy used as well as individual factors may impact the utility of distraction during exposure. The proposed studies will examine different types of distraction as well as their relationship to individual differences in typical distraction use. Study 1 will involve the construction and validation of a questionnaire assessing distraction use, including items assessing perceived necessity of these strategies. Study 2 will involve validating how difficult or taxing a number of potential distraction tasks are, and Study 3 will use these tasks in the context of an exposure session. In this third study, 120 participants with contamination fear complete an exposure session with a feared stimulus (e.g., a dirty toilet), and will be assigned to a no distraction control, mild distraction, moderate distraction, or high distraction condition. They will rate their anxiety throughout the task and at a follow-up visit (when exposed to the same stimulus). This study will also investigate individual differences in outcome.
Program
Doctoral Research Award - Priority Announcement: Patient-Oriented Research
Location
Quebec, Canada
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database

As published

Id
272770
Name
Senn Jessica
Region
Québec
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction
Theme2
Clinical
Prcname2
Doctoral Research Awards - B
Projecttitle
An examination of distraction use in exposure therapy for anxiety
Programtype2
Studentship Programs
Orgnameinp2
Concordia University (Montreal, Quebec)
Cihramount2
$70,000
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Doctoral Research Award - Priority Announcement: Patient-Oriented Research
Keyworddelim
Anxiety; Cognition; Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy; Distraction; Exposure Therapy; Individual Differences; Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder; Treatment Outcome; Working Memory
Abstract
Anxiety disorders are among the most common mental illnesses. The most effective treatment for anxiety disorders is cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT); however, treatment refusal and drop-out rates are high. Exposure, an effective component of CBT, involves gradually exposing oneself to a feared stimuli or situation to habituate to symptoms of anxiety. Although exposure is effective, many clients are unwilling to complete exposures, or refuse treatment due to fear of exposures. Thus, improving the acceptability of exposure may increase treatment acceptance and reduce drop-outs. The current study proposes the use of distraction during exposure to make it more acceptable to clients. There have been mixed findings regarding the impact of distraction use on treatment outcome; thus, it is important to evaluate factors may play a role in whether distraction will aid or interfere with exposure. Specifically, the type of distraction strategy used as well as individual factors may impact the utility of distraction during exposure. The proposed studies will examine different types of distraction as well as their relationship to individual differences in typical distraction use. Study 1 will involve the construction and validation of a questionnaire assessing distraction use, including items assessing perceived necessity of these strategies. Study 2 will involve validating how difficult or taxing a number of potential distraction tasks are, and Study 3 will use these tasks in the context of an exposure session. In this third study, 120 participants with contamination fear complete an exposure session with a feared stimulus (e.g., a dirty toilet), and will be assigned to a no distraction control, mild distraction, moderate distraction, or high distraction condition. They will rate their anxiety throughout the task and at a follow-up visit (when exposed to the same stimulus). This study will also investigate individual differences in outcome.
Competitiondate
201210
Approvedterm2
2 yrs 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Senn, Jessica
Approvedterm
2 ans 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
~ $70,000~ $0~