Canada Spends Logo

Explore our Budget 2026 analysis

Grant: Strategic Projects - Group

University of Guelph

$284,835.00

Metal mixtures - Is 'concentration addition' the correct model for terrestrial ecological risk assessment?

FY 2014-15

Summary
Canada's mining industry an important economic driver - it employs over 300,000 Canadians and is the largest private employer of aboriginal Canadians, contributing 3.5% of Canada's GDP. In Canada, the risk assessment for a site with multiple contaminants is based on the concentration of each contaminant of concern (CoC) relative to its toxicological reference value (TRV); if this ratio for each metal, termed a hazard quotient (HQ), is less than 1, then no adverse effect is expected. The expected toxicity of metal mixtures is not considered. The concentration addition (CA) theory of mixtures toxicity is that the effect of individual CoC is assumed to sum. The proposed research will evaluate if CA is a valid theoretical model for the risk assessment of metal mixtures in soils when the concentration of metals in the mixture is elevated relative to the CCME's soil quality guidelines (SQGs). We will test the CA theory by: (a) developing toxicity thresholds for spiked metal mixtures for three different phyla: microbial processes, invertebrates and plants across a variety of landuses, (b) comparing this response to metal mixtures to single dose responses calculated through the European Union's Predicated No Effect Concentration (PNEC) model, and (c) comparing this response to spiked mixtures from a suite of field-contaminated soils. In brief, the experimental approach is to field-collect reference and metal-mixture-contaminated soils from a variety of locations in Canada, spike the reference soils with single metals and metal mixtures of Co, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn, from which dose-toxicity relationships will be determined for soil organisms, and use the field-contaminated soils for the 'whole mixture' validation. Multiple toxicity endpoints will be determined for a number of phyla, and true, realized dose of soil metals to receptors will be determined using biomimetics. Achieving these objectives will test the robustness of the CA assumption for soil risk assessment and offer predictive tools for sites with complex mixtures. If successful, this project will reduce the need for determination of site specific remediation objectives by providing a robust process for determining site specific estimates of metal mixture toxicity.
Program
Strategic Projects - Group
Location
Ontario, Canada
Recipient Type
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
NSERC's Awards Data

As published

Application id
447178-2013
Name nom
Hale, Beverley
Department département
Environmental Sciences, School of
Organization id
24
Institution établissement
University of Guelph
Province en
Ontario
Province fr
Ontario
Country en
CANADA
Country fr
CANADA
Fiscal year exercice financier
2014
Competition year année de concours
2013
Award amount
284835
Program id
STPGP
Program name en
Strategic Projects - Group
Program name fr
Projets stratégiques - De groupe
Group en
Research partnerships programs
Group fr
Programmes de partenariat
Committee code
1572
Committee name en
Strategic Projects Selection Panel - Natural Resources
Committee name fr
Comité de sélection des projets stratégiques - Ressources naturelles
Area of application code
409
Area of application group en
Environment
Area of application group fr
Environnement
Area of application en
Environmental impact of economic activities (including agriculture)
Area of application fr
Effet des activités économiques sur l'environnement (y compris agriculture)
Research subject code
7003
Research subject group en
Other studies in natural sciences and engineering
Research subject group fr
Autres études en sciences naturelles et en génie
Research subject en
Renewable and non-renewable resources management
Research subject fr
Gestion des ressources renouvelables et non renouvelables
Partie
2
Nb partie
3
Application title
Metal mixtures - Is 'concentration addition' the correct model for terrestrial ecological risk assessment?
Keyword
NSERC
Application summary
Canada's mining industry an important economic driver - it employs over 300,000 Canadians and is the largest private employer of aboriginal Canadians, contributing 3.5% of Canada's GDP. In Canada, the risk assessment for a site with multiple contaminants is based on the concentration of each contaminant of concern (CoC) relative to its toxicological reference value (TRV); if this ratio for each metal, termed a hazard quotient (HQ), is less than 1, then no adverse effect is expected. The expected toxicity of metal mixtures is not considered. The concentration addition (CA) theory of mixtures toxicity is that the effect of individual CoC is assumed to sum. The proposed research will evaluate if CA is a valid theoretical model for the risk assessment of metal mixtures in soils when the concentration of metals in the mixture is elevated relative to the CCME's soil quality guidelines (SQGs). We will test the CA theory by: (a) developing toxicity thresholds for spiked metal mixtures for three different phyla: microbial processes, invertebrates and plants across a variety of landuses, (b) comparing this response to metal mixtures to single dose responses calculated through the European Union's Predicated No Effect Concentration (PNEC) model, and (c) comparing this response to spiked mixtures from a suite of field-contaminated soils. In brief, the experimental approach is to field-collect reference and metal-mixture-contaminated soils from a variety of locations in Canada, spike the reference soils with single metals and metal mixtures of Co, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn, from which dose-toxicity relationships will be determined for soil organisms, and use the field-contaminated soils for the 'whole mixture' validation. Multiple toxicity endpoints will be determined for a number of phyla, and true, realized dose of soil metals to receptors will be determined using biomimetics. Achieving these objectives will test the robustness of the CA assumption for soil risk assessment and offer predictive tools for sites with complex mixtures. If successful, this project will reduce the need for determination of site specific remediation objectives by providing a robust process for determining site specific estimates of metal mixture toxicity.