Canada Spends Logo

Explore our Budget 2026 analysis

Grant: Discovery Grants Program - Individual

Brock University

$15,745.00

Interference and attribution in memory and memory-based choice decisions

FY 2008-09

Summary
When people attempt to describe problems they face in remembering, they often claim that they can't "retrieve" something. The use of this term is indicative of the dominant theory of human memory: remembering consists of retrieval. In contrast to the retrieval view, recent research in cognitive psychology suggests that people rely on decision rules or "heuristics" when making decisions about the past (e.g., Kleider & Goldinger, 2006). To illustrate, suppose a Professor is trying to recall whether the usual "two meetings per month" were held with the graduate students during the current month: a memory trace of strong subjective quality may help the Professor decide that both meetings took place. That is because having a memory trace of a strong subjective quality usually means that an event has taken place twice; such a trace can be used inferentially to determine whether a repetition occurred. However, if the Professor's memory trace is of a strong subjective quality for reasons other than repeated behaviour, the subjective quality heuristic will lead to error: the Professor will falsely believe the meeting occurred twice (Kronlund & Whittlesea, 2006). Recently, in an investigation about learning, I provided evidence against two popular retrieval theories (global matching and signal-detection accounts), specified the inference process, and proposed the notion that a "subjective quality heuristic" is used when people are faced with making memory decisions involving judgments of prior re-occurrence (Kronlund, 2006). These findings leave important questions about the mechanism involved in other memory-based cognitive tasks. The broad goal of my research program is to identify the mechanisms involved in cognitive tasks including memory decisions and memory-based choice decisions. To achieve this end, I will carry out 3 empirical investigations that use recognition, recall, and memory-based choice tasks. I will test alternative theories to heuristic processing. I expect that my research program will provide an original and innovative contribution to the scientific study of human memory and human decision-making. Given that my findings will impact knowledge in human learning and memory, it will have vast applications to education and marketing.
Program
Discovery Grants Program - Individual
Location
Ontario, Canada
Recipient Type
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
NSERC's Awards Data

As published

Application id
342121-2007
Name nom
Mantonakis, Antonia
Department département
Marketing, International Business and Strategy
Organization id
22
Institution établissement
Brock University
Province en
Ontario
Province fr
Ontario
Country en
CANADA
Country fr
CANADA
Fiscal year exercice financier
2008
Competition year année de concours
2007
Award amount
15745
Program id
RGPIN
Program nane en
Discovery Grants Program - Individual
Program name fr
Programme de subventions à la découverte - individuelles
Group en
Discovery grants programs
Group fr
Programmes de subventions à la découverte
Committee code
12
Committee name en
Psychology: Brain, Behaviour & Cognitive Sciences
Committee name fr
Psychologie: Cerveau, comportement et science cognitive
Area of application code
1210
Area of application group en
Advancement of knowledge
Area of application group fr
Avancement des connaissances
Area of application en
Psychology
Area of application fr
Psychologie
Research subject code
6304
Research subject group en
Psychology
Research subject group fr
Psychologie
Research subject en
Cognitive science -- fundamental
Research subject fr
Science cognitive -- principes fondamentaux
Partie
2
Nb partie
5
Application title
Interference and attribution in memory and memory-based choice decisions
Keyword
NA
Application summary
When people attempt to describe problems they face in remembering, they often claim that they can't "retrieve" something. The use of this term is indicative of the dominant theory of human memory: remembering consists of retrieval. In contrast to the retrieval view, recent research in cognitive psychology suggests that people rely on decision rules or "heuristics" when making decisions about the past (e.g., Kleider & Goldinger, 2006). To illustrate, suppose a Professor is trying to recall whether the usual "two meetings per month" were held with the graduate students during the current month: a memory trace of strong subjective quality may help the Professor decide that both meetings took place. That is because having a memory trace of a strong subjective quality usually means that an event has taken place twice; such a trace can be used inferentially to determine whether a repetition occurred. However, if the Professor's memory trace is of a strong subjective quality for reasons other than repeated behaviour, the subjective quality heuristic will lead to error: the Professor will falsely believe the meeting occurred twice (Kronlund & Whittlesea, 2006). Recently, in an investigation about learning, I provided evidence against two popular retrieval theories (global matching and signal-detection accounts), specified the inference process, and proposed the notion that a "subjective quality heuristic" is used when people are faced with making memory decisions involving judgments of prior re-occurrence (Kronlund, 2006). These findings leave important questions about the mechanism involved in other memory-based cognitive tasks. The broad goal of my research program is to identify the mechanisms involved in cognitive tasks including memory decisions and memory-based choice decisions. To achieve this end, I will carry out 3 empirical investigations that use recognition, recall, and memory-based choice tasks. I will test alternative theories to heuristic processing. I expect that my research program will provide an original and innovative contribution to the scientific study of human memory and human decision-making. Given that my findings will impact knowledge in human learning and memory, it will have vast applications to education and marketing.