Grant: Project Grant
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (Toronto)
$569,926.00
Proof-of-Concept Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of the Cognitive Enhancer, Memantine for Gambling Disorder
FY 2024-25
Summary
Between 1 and 4% of Canadian adults develop Gambling Disorder (GD). Despite this relatively low rate of occurrence, the harm associated with GD (e.g., suicide, family breakdown, job loss, crime) has been found to equal that of clinical depression. There is currently no medication approved to treat GD. Relief of GD symptoms from medications tested to date is limited and dropout rates are high (average ~40%). Although psychological therapy seems to be more effective, dropout rates are also very high (39%). Mental inflexibility (MI; getting 'stuck' in a counterproductive pattern of thought) is a key challenge to
treatment in GD. The Alzheimer's medication, memantine (MEM) has recently been found to improve MI in people with obsessive-compulsive disorder. An early study also found that MEM greatly improved GD symptoms and coincided with only 3% dropout over 10 weeks of treatment. This early study did not compare MEM to a placebo (inactive pill). Placebo effects (improvement due to the belief the pill will improve symptoms; 'self-fulfilling prophecy') are very large in GD medication studies, so it is not clear if the decrease in GD symptoms and low dropout rate in the early MEM study are due to the medication, a placebo effect or both. The proposed study will compare placebo to MEM in people with GD (30 per treatment group) to
isolate the benefits of the medication. As a first step, this study aims to address practical aspects of comparing MEM to placebo, including a) ability to enroll 60 participants with GD over 3 years; b) whether dropout rate is lower for MEM than placebo, c) whether MEM side effects are manageable; and d) if participants are taking their doses as prescribed. The decrease in symptoms and MI for MEM vs. placebo will be assessed to identify trends. Results of this small study will show if a full-scale placebo-controlled clinical trial of MEM can
be carried out in future, and if MEM is likely to reduce the symptoms of GD and the harm associated with it.
Department
Program
Project Grant
Location
Ontario, Canada
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database
As published
Id
509489
Name
Le Foll Bernard
Region
Ontario
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction
Theme2
Biomedical
Prcname2
Behavioural Sciences - B: Clinical Behavioural Sciences
Projecttitle
Proof-of-Concept Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of the Cognitive Enhancer, Memantine for Gambling Disorder
Programtype2
Operating Grants
Orgnameinp2
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (Toronto)
Cihramount2
$569,926
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Project Grant
Keyworddelim
Attrition; Cognitive Inflexibility; Gambling Disorder; Memantine; Pharmacotherapy; Proof-Of-Concept; Sensitization
Abstract
Between 1 and 4% of Canadian adults develop Gambling Disorder (GD). Despite this relatively low rate of occurrence, the harm associated with GD (e.g., suicide, family breakdown, job loss, crime) has been found to equal that of clinical depression. There is currently no medication approved to treat GD. Relief of GD symptoms from medications tested to date is limited and dropout rates are high (average ~40%). Although psychological therapy seems to be more effective, dropout rates are also very high (39%). Mental inflexibility (MI; getting 'stuck' in a counterproductive pattern of thought) is a key challenge to
treatment in GD. The Alzheimer's medication, memantine (MEM) has recently been found to improve MI in people with obsessive-compulsive disorder. An early study also found that MEM greatly improved GD symptoms and coincided with only 3% dropout over 10 weeks of treatment. This early study did not compare MEM to a placebo (inactive pill). Placebo effects (improvement due to the belief the pill will improve symptoms; 'self-fulfilling prophecy') are very large in GD medication studies, so it is not clear if the decrease in GD symptoms and low dropout rate in the early MEM study are due to the medication, a placebo effect or both. The proposed study will compare placebo to MEM in people with GD (30 per treatment group) to
isolate the benefits of the medication. As a first step, this study aims to address practical aspects of comparing MEM to placebo, including a) ability to enroll 60 participants with GD over 3 years; b) whether dropout rate is lower for MEM than placebo, c) whether MEM side effects are manageable; and d) if participants are taking their doses as prescribed. The decrease in symptoms and MI for MEM vs. placebo will be assessed to identify trends. Results of this small study will show if a full-scale placebo-controlled clinical trial of MEM can
be carried out in future, and if MEM is likely to reduce the symptoms of GD and the harm associated with it.
Competitiondate
202409
Approvedterm2
3 yrs 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Le Foll, Bernard; Zack, Martin H
Approvedterm
3 ans 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
~ $569,926~ $0~