Grant: Discovery Grants Program - Individual
Université d'Ottawa
$18,000.00
Statistical Methods in Evidence-based Risk Assessment
FY 2024-25
Summary
The major research theme underlying the proposal is value-of-information (VOI) analysis. In preliminary work, a new Bayesian framework for VOI analysis has been developed, allowing trade-offs between the cost, uncertainty, and timeliness of data collected in support of risk assessment. An important component of this new framework is the explicit characterization of the cost of delay in acquiring information on critical population health risks, which can result in a significant public health burden, pending identification and elimination or reduction of those risks. The framework considers two risk decision making paradigms: a benefit-risk decision maker (BRDM), who seeks to minimize the total social cost associated with the risk issue of concern (with adverse population health impacts valued in economic terms), and a target-risk decision maker (TRDM), who seeks to ensure risk is below a pre-determined level. Initial applications of the VOI framework in testing large numbers of chemicals to which humans are exposed suggests that the use of so-called new approach methodologies (NAMs) based on high-throughput in vitro screening (HTS) tests will provide a greater return on investment (ROI) than traditional animal-based toxicity tests, which, although subject to less uncertainty, are much more expensive and time-consuming to conduct.
Two additional research themes will also be pursued as part of this proposal. First, novel points of departure (PoD's) on the exposure-response curve will be examined as the basis for establishing human exposure guidelines, specifically the signal-to-noise crossover dose (SNCD) corresponding to the point where the biological signal cannot be statistically distinguished from the background response rate. Second, optimal experimental designs for estimating the SNCD will be developed in order to obtain the best possible human exposure guidelines.
Collectively, this research will greatly strengthen evidence-based risk assessment practices through the application of VOI analyses to identify the most informative sources of data to support human health risk assessment; by developing improved human exposure guidelines through the use of more refined exposure-response analyses; and by developing optimal experimental designs to maximize the statistical information about the shape of the exposure-response curve.
Program
Discovery Grants Program - Individual
Recipient
Location
Ontario, Canada
Recipient Type
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
NSERC's Awards Data
As published
Application id
RGPIN-2022-05034
Name nom
Krewski, Daniel
Department département
Epidemiology and Community Medicine - Épidémiologie et médecine sociale
Organization id
28
Institution établissement
Université d'Ottawa
Province en
Ontario
Province fr
Ontario
Country en
CANADA
Country fr
CANADA
Fiscal year exercice financier
2024
Competition year année de concours
2022
Award amount
18000
Program id
RGPIN
Program name en
Discovery Grants Program - Individual
Program name fr
Programme de subventions à la découverte - individuelles
Group en
DISCOVERY RESEARCH
Group fr
RECHERCHE AXÉE SUR LA DÉCOUVERTE
Committee code
1508
Committee name en
Mathematics and Statistics
Committee name fr
Mathématiques et statistique
Area of application code
1101
Area of application group en
Health, education and social services
Area of application group fr
Santé publique, éducation et services sociaux
Area of application en
Human health (including medically-related psychological research)
Area of application fr
Santé publique (y compris recherche psychologique liée à la médecine)
Research subject code
3005
Research subject group en
Statistics and probability
Research subject group fr
Statistique et probabilité
Research subject en
Biostatistics
Research subject fr
Biostatistiques
Field of research list names en
Not available
Field of research list names fr
Non disponible
Socioeconomic objective list names en
Not available
Socioeconomic objective list names fr
Non disponible
Application title
Statistical Methods in Evidence-based Risk Assessment
Keywords
biostatistics; value of information; benefit risk decision making; uncertainty analysis; high throughput in-vitro screening; risk assessment; evidence integration; dose response analysis; signal to noise crossover dose; optimal experimental designs
Application summary
The major research theme underlying the proposal is value-of-information (VOI) analysis. In preliminary work, a new Bayesian framework for VOI analysis has been developed, allowing trade-offs between the cost, uncertainty, and timeliness of data collected in support of risk assessment. An important component of this new framework is the explicit characterization of the cost of delay in acquiring information on critical population health risks, which can result in a significant public health burden, pending identification and elimination or reduction of those risks. The framework considers two risk decision making paradigms: a benefit-risk decision maker (BRDM), who seeks to minimize the total social cost associated with the risk issue of concern (with adverse population health impacts valued in economic terms), and a target-risk decision maker (TRDM), who seeks to ensure risk is below a pre-determined level. Initial applications of the VOI framework in testing large numbers of chemicals to which humans are exposed suggests that the use of so-called new approach methodologies (NAMs) based on high-throughput in vitro screening (HTS) tests will provide a greater return on investment (ROI) than traditional animal-based toxicity tests, which, although subject to less uncertainty, are much more expensive and time-consuming to conduct.
Two additional research themes will also be pursued as part of this proposal. First, novel points of departure (PoD's) on the exposure-response curve will be examined as the basis for establishing human exposure guidelines, specifically the signal-to-noise crossover dose (SNCD) corresponding to the point where the biological signal cannot be statistically distinguished from the background response rate. Second, optimal experimental designs for estimating the SNCD will be developed in order to obtain the best possible human exposure guidelines.
Collectively, this research will greatly strengthen evidence-based risk assessment practices through the application of VOI analyses to identify the most informative sources of data to support human health risk assessment; by developing improved human exposure guidelines through the use of more refined exposure-response analyses; and by developing optimal experimental designs to maximize the statistical information about the shape of the exposure-response curve.