Canada Spends Logo

Explore our Budget 2026 analysis

Grant: Travel Awards - Institute Community Support

Université Laval

$2,000.00

Burden of treatment discussion in clinical encounters between patients living with diabetes and primary care physicians: discussion, documentation, and patients' perspective

FY 2025-26

Summary
Living with diabetes requires many daily activities and tasks that can be time-consuming, complex, and overwhelming. This affects the daily lives of people living with diabetes. To address this burden, it needs to be discussed in clinical encounters. So, we studied how it is discussed in clinical encounters with family physicians, if any solutions were proposed to decrease such burden, how it is documented in clinical notes and if it is linked to the burden perceived by the patient. We conducted a study in a rural clinic in Quebec, Canada. We videorecorded 32 clinical encounters between patients living with diabetes and their family physicians. Then we analyzed how the burden is discussed in these encounters. We also analyzed the clinical notes of these encounters to see how these discussions were documented. Finally, we asked patients to fill out a questionnaire about their burden of treatment to measure their perception of the burden. We found that the discussion of the burden of treatment is present in clinical encounters between patients living with diabetes and their family physicians. Patients start most of such discussions, and most often they invoke an action from family physicians (e.g., direct action to decrease the burden, treatment changes, discussion of burden self-management resources for the patient). In terms of documentation, treatment changes were the most documented. Although we did not find a link between the number of discussions and the burden perceived by the patient, our findings suggest that patients with women physicians had more discussions in their clinical encounters.
Program
Travel Awards - Institute Community Support
Location
Quebec, Canada
Recipient Type
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database

As published

Id
558838
Name
Svyntozelska Olha
Region
Québec
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Health Services and Policy Research
Theme2
Clinical
Prcname2
Travel Awards - Institute Community Support
Projecttitle
Burden of treatment discussion in clinical encounters between patients living with diabetes and primary care physicians: discussion, documentation, and patients' perspective
Programtype2
Undefined
Orgnameinp2
Université Laval
Cihramount2
$2,000
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Travel Awards - Institute Community Support
Keyworddelim
Ics Travel Awards
Abstract
Living with diabetes requires many daily activities and tasks that can be time-consuming, complex, and overwhelming. This affects the daily lives of people living with diabetes. To address this burden, it needs to be discussed in clinical encounters. So, we studied how it is discussed in clinical encounters with family physicians, if any solutions were proposed to decrease such burden, how it is documented in clinical notes and if it is linked to the burden perceived by the patient. We conducted a study in a rural clinic in Quebec, Canada. We videorecorded 32 clinical encounters between patients living with diabetes and their family physicians. Then we analyzed how the burden is discussed in these encounters. We also analyzed the clinical notes of these encounters to see how these discussions were documented. Finally, we asked patients to fill out a questionnaire about their burden of treatment to measure their perception of the burden. We found that the discussion of the burden of treatment is present in clinical encounters between patients living with diabetes and their family physicians. Patients start most of such discussions, and most often they invoke an action from family physicians (e.g., direct action to decrease the burden, treatment changes, discussion of burden self-management resources for the patient). In terms of documentation, treatment changes were the most documented. Although we did not find a link between the number of discussions and the burden perceived by the patient, our findings suggest that patients with women physicians had more discussions in their clinical encounters.
Competitiondate
202511
Approvedterm2
1 yr 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Svyntozelska, Olha
Approvedterm
1 an 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
IHSPR~ $2,000~ $0~