Grant: Knowledge Synthesis Grant
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
$99,992.00
Systematic review on the evaluation of reporting guidelines
FY 2010-11
Summary
Practices in research reporting are not optimal; reporting most of health research is poor which makes it more difficult to use research to guide clinical practice. In turn, this affects the decisions that health care professionals are making regarding patient care and may lead to improper treatment decisions. To fix this problem, many reporting guidelines for health research have been developed. Yet their impact on the quality of research reports is still largely unknown. A recent systematic review identified 81 health research reporting guidelines. The proposed systematic review will bring together studies that evaluate the impact of these guidelines on reporting research. Users of reporting guidelines, such as journal editors, peer reviewers and authors, require this information in order to judge the usefulness of a particular guideline when deciding whether or not to use it. This review will provide incentive to journal editors to adhere to reporting guidelines found to be effective at improving reporting quality. Adhering to such guidelines will improve a journals reporting quality and research overall.
Department
Program
Knowledge Synthesis Grant
Recipient
Location
Ontario, Canada
Recipient Type
Other
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database
As published
Id
214362
Name
Moher David
Region
Ontario
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Population and Public Health
Theme2
Biomedical
Prcname2
Knowledge Synthesis Grant
Projecttitle
Systematic review on the evaluation of reporting guidelines
Programtype2
Operating Grants
Orgnameinp2
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Cihramount2
$99,992
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Knowledge Synthesis Grant
Keyworddelim
Evaluating Impact Of Reporting Guidelines; Reporting Guidelines; Reporting Health Research; Systematic Review
Abstract
Practices in research reporting are not optimal; reporting most of health research is poor which makes it more difficult to use research to guide clinical practice. In turn, this affects the decisions that health care professionals are making regarding patient care and may lead to improper treatment decisions. To fix this problem, many reporting guidelines for health research have been developed. Yet their impact on the quality of research reports is still largely unknown. A recent systematic review identified 81 health research reporting guidelines. The proposed systematic review will bring together studies that evaluate the impact of these guidelines on reporting research. Users of reporting guidelines, such as journal editors, peer reviewers and authors, require this information in order to judge the usefulness of a particular guideline when deciding whether or not to use it. This review will provide incentive to journal editors to adhere to reporting guidelines found to be effective at improving reporting quality. Adhering to such guidelines will improve a journals reporting quality and research overall.
Competitiondate
201010
Approvedterm2
1 yr 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Moher, David
Approvedterm
1 an 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
~ $99,992~ $0~