Canada Spends Logo

Explore our Budget 2026 analysis

Grant: Discovery Grants Program - Individual

Laurentian University of Sudbury

$46,688.00

Silicate differentiation on the early earth

FY 2011-12

Summary
Over the past 5 years, new evidence has been gathered regarding the very young Earth. It proves that our planet started to differentiate into metal, mantle and crust surprisingly soon after its final assembly. Although there is unanimous agreement about early differentiation, opinions range between two extreme viewpoints regarding the way in which the planet started to take shape. ) On the one extreme is the strict uniformitarian view, according to which the Earth's main geological processes of today pretty much operated 4.4 billion years ago. This concept, also known as the 'cool early Earth model', proposes that the familiar concept of plate tectonics was the main driving force behind planetary cooling. On the other extreme is the view that the early Earth was an inhospitable place whose atmosphere was filled with methane and whose surface was constantly covered in abundant mafic volcanic rocks, culminating in an event known as the late heavy meteorite bombardment. Here I identify several areas of research that will aim to provide new evidence to help resolve these conflicting views. ) First, we need to get a better handle on the age of the Moon because this will allow us to date the last step in the assembly of the Earth via the giant impact. My idea is to combine argon and lead isotope evidence to tease out a more precise minimum age of the Moon and the Earth. ) Second, we need to better understand how quickly metal cores formed on planetary precursors. There is a suite of meteorites (eucrites) that have been studied with hafnium-tungsten isotope systematics. The results are published but uncertainty about metal segregation time remains because we don't understand the geochemical behavior of tungsten well enough. This can be remedied with a study of modern mantle melts. ) Third, to everybody's surprise, some of the oldest zircon minerals on Earth were found to contain diamond inclusions. Is it possible that these diamonds formed when the early Earth was battered with meteorites, just as the Moon was? Or were these zircons formed deep in the Earth's interior? We need to know and we can study the Sudbury impact basin as an analogue for the early Earth.
Program
Discovery Grants Program - Individual
Location
Ontario, Canada
Recipient Type
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
NSERC's Awards Data

As published

Application id
327053-2009
Name nom
Kamber, Balz
Department département
Earth Sciences
Organization id
26
Institution établissement
Laurentian University of Sudbury
Province en
Ontario
Province fr
Ontario
Country en
CANADA
Country fr
CANADA
Fiscal year exercice financier
2011
Competition year année de concours
2009
Award amount
46688
Program id
RGPIN
Program nane en
Discovery Grants Program - Individual
Program name fr
Programme de subventions à la découverte - individuelles
Group en
Discovery grants programs
Group fr
Programmes de subventions à la découverte
Committee code
8
Committee name en
Solid Earth Sciences
Committee name fr
Sciences de la Terre solide
Area of application code
1200
Area of application group en
Advancement of knowledge
Area of application group fr
Avancement des connaissances
Area of application en
Advancement of knowledge
Area of application fr
Avancement des connaissances
Research subject code
4200
Research subject group en
Geochemistry and geochronology
Research subject group fr
Géochimie et géochronologie
Research subject en
Geochemistry and geochronology
Research subject fr
Géochimie et géochronologie
Partie
3
Nb partie
3
Application title
Silicate differentiation on the early earth
Keyword
NSERC
Application summary
Over the past 5 years, new evidence has been gathered regarding the very young Earth. It proves that our planet started to differentiate into metal, mantle and crust surprisingly soon after its final assembly. Although there is unanimous agreement about early differentiation, opinions range between two extreme viewpoints regarding the way in which the planet started to take shape. ) On the one extreme is the strict uniformitarian view, according to which the Earth's main geological processes of today pretty much operated 4.4 billion years ago. This concept, also known as the 'cool early Earth model', proposes that the familiar concept of plate tectonics was the main driving force behind planetary cooling. On the other extreme is the view that the early Earth was an inhospitable place whose atmosphere was filled with methane and whose surface was constantly covered in abundant mafic volcanic rocks, culminating in an event known as the late heavy meteorite bombardment. Here I identify several areas of research that will aim to provide new evidence to help resolve these conflicting views. ) First, we need to get a better handle on the age of the Moon because this will allow us to date the last step in the assembly of the Earth via the giant impact. My idea is to combine argon and lead isotope evidence to tease out a more precise minimum age of the Moon and the Earth. ) Second, we need to better understand how quickly metal cores formed on planetary precursors. There is a suite of meteorites (eucrites) that have been studied with hafnium-tungsten isotope systematics. The results are published but uncertainty about metal segregation time remains because we don't understand the geochemical behavior of tungsten well enough. This can be remedied with a study of modern mantle melts. ) Third, to everybody's surprise, some of the oldest zircon minerals on Earth were found to contain diamond inclusions. Is it possible that these diamonds formed when the early Earth was battered with meteorites, just as the Moon was? Or were these zircons formed deep in the Earth's interior? We need to know and we can study the Sudbury impact basin as an analogue for the early Earth.
Laurentian University of Sudbury - $46,688 Grant (201… | Canada Spends