Grant: Project Grant
University of Toronto
$1,277,550.00
Do Land-Centered Mitigation Strategies Positively Impact Indigenous Health and Wellbeing in subarctic Canada?
FY 2017-18
Summary
Indigenous Knowledge is a body of knowledge and beliefs transmitted orally, being both cumulative and dynamic. During the 1970s, Indigenous knowledge gained credibility on the international stage. When there is more than one way of knowing, all ways should be used to contribute to a more complete understanding of complex environment-and-health issues, such as, development on Indigenous traditional homelands. The proposed project will use Indigenous knowledge and mainstream science as complementary ways of knowing and doing, in order to evaluate land-centered mitigation strategies related to development projects on Indigenous homelands. It is well recognized worldwide that Indigenous groups have significantly lower standards of health compared to their non-Indigenous counterparts, and although many closing-the-gap programs have been initiated, this gap remains. Recently, there has been a movement away from this deficit model with more attention being paid by governments and researchers to the importance of time on the land as related to health and wellbeing. The proposed project will evaluate two existing land-centred mitigation programs. To evaluate the programs, we will use both quantitative and qualitative methods. We are trying to identify the key elements of these land-centered mitigation programs that promote health and wellbeing in Indigenous homelands, in the context of development. We want to develop a best practices framework that can be used to help inform future negotiated agreements between governments (or other proponents of development) and Indigenous groups, and also inform other government-administered programs. The proposed study will provide Indigenous communities, health care professionals, development proponents, and policy makers with new information on health and wellbeing, with respect to land-centered mitigation strategies.
Department
Program
Project Grant
Recipient
Location
Ontario, Canada
Recipient Type
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database
As published
Id
368569
Name
Tsuji Leonard J
Region
Ontario
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Research Institution; Institution Paid
Instname2
Indigenous Peoples' Health
Theme2
Social / Cultural / Environmental / Population Health
Prcname2
Indigenous Health Research
Projecttitle
Do Land-Centered Mitigation Strategies Positively Impact Indigenous Health and Wellbeing in subarctic Canada?
Programtype2
Operating Grants
Orgnameinp2
University of Toronto
Cihramount2
$1,277,550
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Project Grant
Keyworddelim
Best Practices; Development; Environment And Health; Health And Wellbeing; Indigenous Homelands; Knowledge Translation; Land-Centred Mitigation Strategies; Negotiated Agreements; Subarctic Canada; Two-Eyed Seeing
Abstract
Indigenous Knowledge is a body of knowledge and beliefs transmitted orally, being both cumulative and dynamic. During the 1970s, Indigenous knowledge gained credibility on the international stage. When there is more than one way of knowing, all ways should be used to contribute to a more complete understanding of complex environment-and-health issues, such as, development on Indigenous traditional homelands. The proposed project will use Indigenous knowledge and mainstream science as complementary ways of knowing and doing, in order to evaluate land-centered mitigation strategies related to development projects on Indigenous homelands. It is well recognized worldwide that Indigenous groups have significantly lower standards of health compared to their non-Indigenous counterparts, and although many closing-the-gap programs have been initiated, this gap remains. Recently, there has been a movement away from this deficit model with more attention being paid by governments and researchers to the importance of time on the land as related to health and wellbeing. The proposed project will evaluate two existing land-centred mitigation programs. To evaluate the programs, we will use both quantitative and qualitative methods. We are trying to identify the key elements of these land-centered mitigation programs that promote health and wellbeing in Indigenous homelands, in the context of development. We want to develop a best practices framework that can be used to help inform future negotiated agreements between governments (or other proponents of development) and Indigenous groups, and also inform other government-administered programs. The proposed study will provide Indigenous communities, health care professionals, development proponents, and policy makers with new information on health and wellbeing, with respect to land-centered mitigation strategies.
Competitiondate
201709
Approvedterm2
5 yrs 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Tsuji, Leonard J; Katapatuk, Billy; Liberda, Eric N; Solomon, Andrew
Approvedterm
5 ans 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
~ $1,277,550~ $0~