Grant: Operating Grant
Unity Health Toronto
$726,927.00
Pathogenesis and treatment of immune thrombocytopenia: Are there fundamental differences between anti-GPIba and anti-GPIIbIIIa mediated thrombocytopenia?
EF 2008-09
Résumé
Platelets are small blood cells responsible for forming clots at the site of bleeding. They aggregate to form a cellular plug, strengthen the coagulation system when blood vessels are injured, and are critical in preventing blood loss. Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a disease where the immune system mistakenly produces antibodies which destroy the patient's own platelets. Thus, the patient cannot stop bleeding properly, which can lead to severe health problems or death. The antibodies in this disease attack two proteins (antigens), called GPIIbIIIa and GPIb, which are on the surface of platelets. These proteins are responsible for physically connecting platelets together and sticking to the vessel wall to stop bleeding. Approximately 70-80% ITP patients have antibodies to GPIIbIIIa, 20-40% patients have antibodies to GPIb, and some patients have antibodies to both proteins. Currently, it is not clear whether the antibodies to GPIIbIIIa and GPIb work the same (mechanism of disease), and if ITP caused by antibodies to these two proteins can be treated successfully by the same therapies. We also do not know whether some patients have more severe bleeding than others because of the specific type of antibodies in their blood (i.e. whether severity is related to the protein or the sub-section of the protein that the antibody attacks). We propose to address these questions and investigate whether antibodies against GPIb and GPIIbIIIa may act differently by causing: i) a change in platelet signalling activity, or ii) changing the physical structure of GPIIbIIIa and GPIb proteins, or iii) affecting platelet generation. We think that different antibodies may affect platelet function in a different manner, determine where platelets are destroyed, and how patients respond to current clinical therapies (e.g. removing patient's spleen or treatment with IVIG).
Programme
Operating Grant
Bénéficiaire
Emplacement
Ontario, Canada
Type de bénéficiaire
Other
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database
Tel que publié
Id
180806
Name
Ni Heyu
Region
Ontario
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Circulatory and Respiratory Health
Theme2
Biomedical
Prcname2
Experimental Medicine
Projecttitle
Pathogenesis and treatment of immune thrombocytopenia: Are there fundamental differences between anti-GPIba and anti-GPIIbIIIa mediated thrombocytopenia?
Programtype2
Operating Grants
Orgnameinp2
Unity Health Toronto
Cihramount2
$726,927
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Operating Grant
Keyworddelim
Immune Thrombocytopenia (Itp): Autoimmune Bleeding Disorder; Intravenous Immunoglobulin G (Ivig); Monoclonal Antibody Epitope Mapping; Platelet Antigens: Gpiibiiia Versus Gpib; Platelet Clearance And Phagocytosis; Platelet Function And Platelet Generation
Abstract
Platelets are small blood cells responsible for forming clots at the site of bleeding. They aggregate to form a cellular plug, strengthen the coagulation system when blood vessels are injured, and are critical in preventing blood loss. Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a disease where the immune system mistakenly produces antibodies which destroy the patient's own platelets. Thus, the patient cannot stop bleeding properly, which can lead to severe health problems or death. The antibodies in this disease attack two proteins (antigens), called GPIIbIIIa and GPIb, which are on the surface of platelets. These proteins are responsible for physically connecting platelets together and sticking to the vessel wall to stop bleeding. Approximately 70-80% ITP patients have antibodies to GPIIbIIIa, 20-40% patients have antibodies to GPIb, and some patients have antibodies to both proteins. Currently, it is not clear whether the antibodies to GPIIbIIIa and GPIb work the same (mechanism of disease), and if ITP caused by antibodies to these two proteins can be treated successfully by the same therapies. We also do not know whether some patients have more severe bleeding than others because of the specific type of antibodies in their blood (i.e. whether severity is related to the protein or the sub-section of the protein that the antibody attacks). We propose to address these questions and investigate whether antibodies against GPIb and GPIIbIIIa may act differently by causing: i) a change in platelet signalling activity, or ii) changing the physical structure of GPIIbIIIa and GPIb proteins, or iii) affecting platelet generation. We think that different antibodies may affect platelet function in a different manner, determine where platelets are destroyed, and how patients respond to current clinical therapies (e.g. removing patient's spleen or treatment with IVIG).
Competitiondate
200903
Approvedterm2
5 yrs 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Ni, Heyu
Approvedterm
5 ans 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
~ $726,927~ $0~