Grant: Doctoral: Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarships
University of British Columbia
$150,000.00
The growing crisis of overly big babies: Comparing prevalence, outcomes and risk factors in midwifery v physician care
EF 2017-18
Résumé
A bigger than average baby (called macrosomia) is generally accepted as an adverse outcome in maternity care. About 10% of all babies in Canada are macrosomic. This is a significant public health concern as macrosomia has been linked to higher rates of cesarean or forceps delivery, severe birth trauma, excess bleeding, infant birth injury and infant death. Macrosomia is increasingly common worldwide, in part due to increases in obesity, excess weight gain and diabetes among childbearing women. A surprising recent finding indicated that 18% of all midwife-involved births in Ontario were macrosomic babies. Midwifery is a rapidly growing profession in Canada and outcomes are understudied. Reasons for these elevated rates of macrosomia among midwifery clients is unknown. Further, the impact of macrosomia on severe health outcomes is also unknown and it may differ for midwifery vs physician care. This study proposes to address this serious research gap by examining two cohorts of births in BC and WA state who were attended by midwives and physicians. The study findings will clarify the extent of macrosomia and associated severe outcomes among midwife v. physician births. Further, this will identify individual factors, aspects of prenatal or labor (adherence to specific obstetric guidelines from the Society of Gynecologists of Canada), or differences in training of midwives or gestational diabetes screening methods which could reduce severe morbidities among bigger babies and their mothers. Study findings can be used to propose evidence-based interventions, updated guidelines or policies to improve health for larger babies and reduce adverse outcomes such as cesarean delivery, birth trauma, or newborn birth injury.
Programme
Doctoral: Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarships
Bénéficiaire
Emplacement
British Columbia, Canada
Type de bénéficiaire
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database
Tel que publié
Id
376218
Name
Nethery Elizabeth M
Region
British Columbia
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Population and Public Health
Theme2
Social / Cultural / Environmental / Population Health
Prcname2
Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarships CIHR
Projecttitle
The growing crisis of overly big babies: Comparing prevalence, outcomes and risk factors in midwifery v physician care
Programtype2
Studentship Programs
Orgnameinp2
University of British Columbia
Cihramount2
$150,000
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Doctoral: Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarships
Keyworddelim
Health Services; Large For Gestational Age; Macrosomia; Model Of Care; Neonatal Outcomes; Normal Birth; Population Health; Pregnancy And Birth
Abstract
A bigger than average baby (called macrosomia) is generally accepted as an adverse outcome in maternity care. About 10% of all babies in Canada are macrosomic. This is a significant public health concern as macrosomia has been linked to higher rates of cesarean or forceps delivery, severe birth trauma, excess bleeding, infant birth injury and infant death. Macrosomia is increasingly common worldwide, in part due to increases in obesity, excess weight gain and diabetes among childbearing women. A surprising recent finding indicated that 18% of all midwife-involved births in Ontario were macrosomic babies. Midwifery is a rapidly growing profession in Canada and outcomes are understudied. Reasons for these elevated rates of macrosomia among midwifery clients is unknown. Further, the impact of macrosomia on severe health outcomes is also unknown and it may differ for midwifery vs physician care. This study proposes to address this serious research gap by examining two cohorts of births in BC and WA state who were attended by midwives and physicians. The study findings will clarify the extent of macrosomia and associated severe outcomes among midwife v. physician births. Further, this will identify individual factors, aspects of prenatal or labor (adherence to specific obstetric guidelines from the Society of Gynecologists of Canada), or differences in training of midwives or gestational diabetes screening methods which could reduce severe morbidities among bigger babies and their mothers. Study findings can be used to propose evidence-based interventions, updated guidelines or policies to improve health for larger babies and reduce adverse outcomes such as cesarean delivery, birth trauma, or newborn birth injury.
Competitiondate
201711
Approvedterm2
3 yrs 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Nethery, Elizabeth M
Approvedterm
3 ans 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
~ $150,000~ $0~