Canada Spends Logo

Explorez notre analyse du budget 2026

Grant: Travel Awards - Institute Community Support

University of Toronto

$1,500.00

Impacts of an Unsanctioned Overdose Prevention Site in Toronto: A Preliminary Analysis

EF 2017-18

Résumé
Background: Dramatic increases in opioid overdose mortality have led to rapid proliferation of supervised injection services - currently approved or open in 8 Canadian cities - for people who inject illicit drugs. Over 20 overdose prevention sites (OPS) have also opened, including sanctioned OPS in BC and unsanctioned ones in Ontario, to address overdose-related morbidity and mortality. Objectives: This paper explores data from the first 4 months of operation of an unsanctioned OPS in Moss Park, Toronto, and examines issues involved in providing grassroots emergency health services in the absence of government resources. Methods: Anonymous data on all people accessing injection monitoring from August 19th to November 30th, 2017 were collected and analysed, including age, gender, drugs injected, overdose frequency, and intervention during overdoses. Results: 2933 visits to the injection tent occurred; 66.5% of clients were male, 33.5% female. Self-reported drugs being injected were: fentanyl (33.3%); heroin (20.0%); "down" (unspecified opioid) (15.5%); and hydromorphone (10.4%). Overdose occurred in 3.4% of all recorded injections; 52.2% occurred after fentanyl injection. Overdoses were treated with naloxone in 40% of the cases, and with oxygen, monitoring and/or stimulation in 60% of the cases. No significant gender difference was found in overdose rates. No one accessing the site died. Conclusions: OPS are a low-barrier, low-cost method of intervening during a public health drug poisoning and overdose crisis. In the absence of a timely and effective federal exemption process, municipal and provincial health officials should consider OPS as a simple yet effective intervention to reduce opioid-related mortality.
Programme
Travel Awards - Institute Community Support
Bénéficiaire
Emplacement
Ontario, Canada
Type de bénéficiaire
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database

Tel que publié

Id
380515
Name
Kolla Gillian
Region
Ontario
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Population and Public Health
Theme2
Social / Cultural / Environmental / Population Health
Prcname2
CPHA Conference
Projecttitle
Impacts of an Unsanctioned Overdose Prevention Site in Toronto: A Preliminary Analysis
Programtype2
Undefined
Orgnameinp2
University of Toronto
Cihramount2
$1,500
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Travel Awards - Institute Community Support
Keyworddelim
Opioids; Overdose; Public Health; Substance Use
Abstract
Background: Dramatic increases in opioid overdose mortality have led to rapid proliferation of supervised injection services - currently approved or open in 8 Canadian cities - for people who inject illicit drugs. Over 20 overdose prevention sites (OPS) have also opened, including sanctioned OPS in BC and unsanctioned ones in Ontario, to address overdose-related morbidity and mortality. Objectives: This paper explores data from the first 4 months of operation of an unsanctioned OPS in Moss Park, Toronto, and examines issues involved in providing grassroots emergency health services in the absence of government resources. Methods: Anonymous data on all people accessing injection monitoring from August 19th to November 30th, 2017 were collected and analysed, including age, gender, drugs injected, overdose frequency, and intervention during overdoses. Results: 2933 visits to the injection tent occurred; 66.5% of clients were male, 33.5% female. Self-reported drugs being injected were: fentanyl (33.3%); heroin (20.0%); "down" (unspecified opioid) (15.5%); and hydromorphone (10.4%). Overdose occurred in 3.4% of all recorded injections; 52.2% occurred after fentanyl injection. Overdoses were treated with naloxone in 40% of the cases, and with oxygen, monitoring and/or stimulation in 60% of the cases. No significant gender difference was found in overdose rates. No one accessing the site died. Conclusions: OPS are a low-barrier, low-cost method of intervening during a public health drug poisoning and overdose crisis. In the absence of a timely and effective federal exemption process, municipal and provincial health officials should consider OPS as a simple yet effective intervention to reduce opioid-related mortality.
Competitiondate
201802
Approvedterm2
1 yr 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Kolla, Gillian
Approvedterm
1 an 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
Inst of Population &Publ Hlth~ $1,500~ $0~