Canada Spends Logo

Explorez notre analyse du budget 2026

Grant: Travel Awards - Institute Community Support

Queen's University (Kingston, Ontario)

$2,400.00

A Painful Experience: Examining Physiological Pain during Psychophysical Testing in Women with and without Provoked Vestibulodynia

EF 2015-16

Résumé
Provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) is characterized by the subjective experience of pain in response to pressure applied around vulvar vestibule. Currently, the assessment and diagnosis of PVD relies on: self-reported pain during vaginal penetration, the absence of an identifiable physiological cause of the pain, and pain elicited during a gynecological examination. Despite the fact that self-reported vulvar pain sensitivity during psychophysical testing distinguishes women with and without PVD, there is some reluctance to rely on subjective pain reporting as diagnostic. Moreover, within the pain literature, self-reported pain ratings are often criticized due to the influence of psychological and emotional factors. Therefore, an examination of pain using a physiological measure (galvanic skin response; GSR) could help to further elucidate the pain experience in women with PVD. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether GSR could be used as an index of pain in women with and without PVD. Results revealed that women with PVD (n = 18) had significantly lower vulvar pain thresholds than women without PVD (n = 18) using two types of vulvalgesiometers. The physiological assessment of pain revealed a significant increase in GSR (relative to baseline) during painful stimulation in both groups of women, providing objective evidence of pain. This study replicated and extends previous research finding that women with PVD have higher self-reported vulvar pain sensitivity than women without PVD, as well as exhibit a physiological response to painful stimuli. Together, these data provides evidence that women's vulvar pain is detectable using both self-report and physiological parameters. Given the utility of GSR as an index of pain, researchers may consider including GSR during their assessment of PVD in order to fully evaluate the pain experience, as well as examining changes in women's experience of pain as a function of treatment.
Programme
Travel Awards - Institute Community Support
Emplacement
Ontario, Canada
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database

Tel que publié

Id
331906
Name
Dawson Samantha J
Region
Ontario
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Gender and Health
Theme2
Clinical
Prcname2
Institute of Gender and Health
Projecttitle
A Painful Experience: Examining Physiological Pain during Psychophysical Testing in Women with and without Provoked Vestibulodynia
Programtype2
Undefined
Orgnameinp2
Queen's University (Kingston, Ontario)
Cihramount2
$2,400
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Travel Awards - Institute Community Support
Keyworddelim
Galvanic Skin Response; Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder; Gynaecology; Pain; Provoked Vestibulodynia; Psychophysical Testing; Sexual Health; Women
Abstract
Provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) is characterized by the subjective experience of pain in response to pressure applied around vulvar vestibule. Currently, the assessment and diagnosis of PVD relies on: self-reported pain during vaginal penetration, the absence of an identifiable physiological cause of the pain, and pain elicited during a gynecological examination. Despite the fact that self-reported vulvar pain sensitivity during psychophysical testing distinguishes women with and without PVD, there is some reluctance to rely on subjective pain reporting as diagnostic. Moreover, within the pain literature, self-reported pain ratings are often criticized due to the influence of psychological and emotional factors. Therefore, an examination of pain using a physiological measure (galvanic skin response; GSR) could help to further elucidate the pain experience in women with PVD. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether GSR could be used as an index of pain in women with and without PVD. Results revealed that women with PVD (n = 18) had significantly lower vulvar pain thresholds than women without PVD (n = 18) using two types of vulvalgesiometers. The physiological assessment of pain revealed a significant increase in GSR (relative to baseline) during painful stimulation in both groups of women, providing objective evidence of pain. This study replicated and extends previous research finding that women with PVD have higher self-reported vulvar pain sensitivity than women without PVD, as well as exhibit a physiological response to painful stimuli. Together, these data provides evidence that women's vulvar pain is detectable using both self-report and physiological parameters. Given the utility of GSR as an index of pain, researchers may consider including GSR during their assessment of PVD in order to fully evaluate the pain experience, as well as examining changes in women's experience of pain as a function of treatment.
Competitiondate
201505
Approvedterm2
1 yr 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Dawson, Samantha J
Approvedterm
1 an 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
Inst of Gender & Health~ $2,400~ $0~