Grant: Discovery Grants Program - Individual
York University
$40,000.00
Neural basis of reasoning
EF 2011-12
Résumé
Yesterday I said to my son: ""if you want dinner tonight, you need to stop tormenting your sister."" For order to be restored, he needs to draw the correct logical inference. Our lab has been studying the underlying brain mechanisms involved in successfully drawing such inferences. Over the years we have looked at how issues of familiarity of reasoning material, the presence of uncertainty, the presence of conflict, and the presence of emotionally laden content dynamically reconfigure the neural systems engaged in reasoning processes. In the present set of studies we propose to further this line of research in three ways. First, we propose to take a closer look at the issue of transitivity (A >B; B >C; A >C.), a very basic cornerstone of logical inference. In particular, some labs have been reporting a critical role for right anterior lateral prefrontal cortex (BA 10) in relational integration, while our own work is pointing to the involvement of parietal cortex (BA 40/7). We propose to undertake several studies to understand the relative contributions of frontal and parietal cortex in transitive inference. Second, there is the intriguing question of whether there are any sex differences in the recruitment of brain areas for logical reasoning. There is no evidence for sex differences in actual reasoning abilities. But logical reasoning, in particular transitive inference, involves visuospatial manipulation. There are reasons to believe that males and females utilize different strategies for spatial navigation tasks. It is possible that males and females may utilize different neural systems in logical inference tasks while arriving at the same conclusion. We propose several experiments to look at this issue. Third, all studies to date looking at the neural basis of logical reasoning involve measuring the bold response with fMRI as subjects are engaged in the reasoning task. We propose to argument these studies with volumetric MRI analyses, whereby, we correlate participants ability to engage in transitive inference with relative grey matter cortical density in parietal and frontal lobe regions. These studies will further our basic understanding of the neural basis of reasoning.
Programme
Discovery Grants Program - Individual
Bénéficiaire
Emplacement
Ontario, Canada
Type de bénéficiaire
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
NSERC's Awards Data
Tel que publié
Application id
170334-2011
Name nom
Goel, Vinod
Department département
Psychology
Organization id
38
Institution établissement
York University
Province en
Ontario
Province fr
Ontario
Country en
CANADA
Country fr
CANADA
Fiscal year exercice financier
2011
Competition year année de concours
2011
Award amount
40000
Program id
RGPIN
Program nane en
Discovery Grants Program - Individual
Program name fr
Programme de subventions à la découverte - individuelles
Group en
Discovery grants programs
Group fr
Programmes de subventions à la découverte
Committee code
1502
Committee name en
Biological Systems and Functions
Committee name fr
Systèmes et fonctions biologiques
Area of application code
1200
Area of application group en
Advancement of knowledge
Area of application group fr
Avancement des connaissances
Area of application en
Advancement of knowledge
Area of application fr
Avancement des connaissances
Research subject code
6307
Research subject group en
Psychology
Research subject group fr
Psychologie
Research subject en
Cognitive science -- other
Research subject fr
Science cognitive -- autres
Partie
1
Nb partie
5
Application title
Neural basis of reasoning
Keyword
NSERC
Application summary
Yesterday I said to my son: ""if you want dinner tonight, you need to stop tormenting your sister."" For order to be restored, he needs to draw the correct logical inference. Our lab has been studying the underlying brain mechanisms involved in successfully drawing such inferences. Over the years we have looked at how issues of familiarity of reasoning material, the presence of uncertainty, the presence of conflict, and the presence of emotionally laden content dynamically reconfigure the neural systems engaged in reasoning processes. In the present set of studies we propose to further this line of research in three ways. First, we propose to take a closer look at the issue of transitivity (A >B; B >C; A >C.), a very basic cornerstone of logical inference. In particular, some labs have been reporting a critical role for right anterior lateral prefrontal cortex (BA 10) in relational integration, while our own work is pointing to the involvement of parietal cortex (BA 40/7). We propose to undertake several studies to understand the relative contributions of frontal and parietal cortex in transitive inference. Second, there is the intriguing question of whether there are any sex differences in the recruitment of brain areas for logical reasoning. There is no evidence for sex differences in actual reasoning abilities. But logical reasoning, in particular transitive inference, involves visuospatial manipulation. There are reasons to believe that males and females utilize different strategies for spatial navigation tasks. It is possible that males and females may utilize different neural systems in logical inference tasks while arriving at the same conclusion. We propose several experiments to look at this issue. Third, all studies to date looking at the neural basis of logical reasoning involve measuring the bold response with fMRI as subjects are engaged in the reasoning task. We propose to argument these studies with volumetric MRI analyses, whereby, we correlate participants ability to engage in transitive inference with relative grey matter cortical density in parietal and frontal lobe regions. These studies will further our basic understanding of the neural basis of reasoning.