Grant: Travel Awards - Institute Community Support
University of Toronto
$778.00
Patient Income Level and Purchase of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment among Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Administrative Claim-Based Analyses
EF 2014-15
Résumé
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is sleep-related breathing disorder characterized by repeated airway obstruction during sleep in association with sleep fragmentation and intermittent hypoxemia. OSA may cause daytime sleepiness, traffic accidents, and predispose to health problems such as hypertension or stroke. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is recommended treatment for OSA. However, CPAP treatment acceptance is low. Understanding critical elements associated with a patient's decision to purchase CPAP, such as an income status, is crucial in promoting treatment acceptance.
Ontario has a universal health system that covers diagnosis of OSA and 75% of the CPAP cost regardless of patient income. Patients usually co-pay from $200 to $400 depending on the supplementary health insurance and CPAP type. This offers a unique environment to evaluate if patient income status limits purchase/acceptance of CPAP. To do so, we linked information on 4,291 patients with OSA to the provincial health administrative data to determine who purchased CPAP and patients' income status. We focused on patients with severe OSA assuming all these patients purchase the device.
In patients with severe OSA the percentage of subjects with the lowest income was higher among those who did not purchase CPAP. However, controlling for age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, and comorbidities, there was no significant relationship between income level and CPAP purchase. Our finding suggests that in the province of Ontario, financial concerns may be not an obstacle to CPAP treatment for this patient population. However, even among patients with severe OSA the CPAP acceptance rate was low at 58%.
Our findings may support decision making about co-payment amount for policy makers. An increase in amount of co-payment may result in further dropping in acceptance. From the physician perspective, CPAP acceptance level may be improved by providing early education and support for patients.
Programme
Travel Awards - Institute Community Support
Bénéficiaire
Emplacement
Ontario, Canada
Type de bénéficiaire
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database
Tel que publié
Id
324077
Name
Kendzerska Tetyana
Region
Ontario
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Research Institution; Institution Paid
Instname2
Circulatory and Respiratory Health
Theme2
Clinical
Prcname2
Canadian Sleep Society
Projecttitle
Patient Income Level and Purchase of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment among Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Administrative Claim-Based Analyses
Programtype2
Undefined
Orgnameinp2
University of Toronto
Cihramount2
$778
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Travel Awards - Institute Community Support
Keyworddelim
A Historical Cohort Study; Acceptence Of Treatment; Administrative Claim-Based Analyses; Obstructive Sleep Apnea; Patient Income Status
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is sleep-related breathing disorder characterized by repeated airway obstruction during sleep in association with sleep fragmentation and intermittent hypoxemia. OSA may cause daytime sleepiness, traffic accidents, and predispose to health problems such as hypertension or stroke. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is recommended treatment for OSA. However, CPAP treatment acceptance is low. Understanding critical elements associated with a patient's decision to purchase CPAP, such as an income status, is crucial in promoting treatment acceptance.
Ontario has a universal health system that covers diagnosis of OSA and 75% of the CPAP cost regardless of patient income. Patients usually co-pay from $200 to $400 depending on the supplementary health insurance and CPAP type. This offers a unique environment to evaluate if patient income status limits purchase/acceptance of CPAP. To do so, we linked information on 4,291 patients with OSA to the provincial health administrative data to determine who purchased CPAP and patients' income status. We focused on patients with severe OSA assuming all these patients purchase the device.
In patients with severe OSA the percentage of subjects with the lowest income was higher among those who did not purchase CPAP. However, controlling for age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, and comorbidities, there was no significant relationship between income level and CPAP purchase. Our finding suggests that in the province of Ontario, financial concerns may be not an obstacle to CPAP treatment for this patient population. However, even among patients with severe OSA the CPAP acceptance rate was low at 58%.
Our findings may support decision making about co-payment amount for policy makers. An increase in amount of co-payment may result in further dropping in acceptance. From the physician perspective, CPAP acceptance level may be improved by providing early education and support for patients.
Competitiondate
201501
Approvedterm2
1 yr 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Kendzerska, Tetyana
Approvedterm
1 an 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
Inst of Circ &Respiratory Hlth~ $778~ $0~