Canada Spends Logo

Explorez notre analyse du budget 2026

Grant: Discovery Grants Program - Individual

University of Lethbridge

$25,000.00

Dynamics of Distraction: Physiological Correlates of Selective Listening Revealed in Brain Electrical Dynamics

EF 2014-15

Résumé
One of the most amazing skills of the human brain is its ability to discern individual streams of information, such as a single voice, from a complex mixture of many simultaneous sources of sound. This ability is called selective listening and it is one example of the broader phenomenon of selective attention. As we all know, selective listening is not perfect. Sometimes we are distracted by other sounds or even input to our other senses. Surprisingly, the field of Cognitive Neuroscience has not devoted much effort to understanding the underlying mechanisms of distraction. This is probably because we intuitively think of distraction as simply ""not attending"", but this is an error of oversimplification. What happens to auditory circuits when conflicting input disrupts their ability to effectively process sounds? Are there multiple mechanisms of distraction acting at different stages of cortical processing? Are there ways to prevent distraction by augmenting important signals in the auditory world? The research proposed here has two goals. The first goal is to test the theory that auditory distraction arises when oscillating neuroelectric signals in the brain become temporally uncoupled from the acoustic events in the auditory scene. The resulting phenomenon, which I call Distraction Decoherence, would disrupt the efficiency with which the brain accomplishes selective listening. The second goal is to develop ways to detect the neural signatures of distraction using state-of-the-art wireless EEG devices. If we can detect moments of distraction then we can develop neurotechnologies that redirect attention toward important events in the sensory world.
Programme
Discovery Grants Program - Individual
Emplacement
Alberta, Canada
Type de bénéficiaire
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
NSERC's Awards Data

Tel que publié

Application id
355922-2013
Name nom
Tata, Matthew
Department département
Neuroscience
Organization id
12
Institution établissement
University of Lethbridge
Province en
Alberta
Province fr
Alberta
Country en
CANADA
Country fr
CANADA
Fiscal year exercice financier
2014
Competition year année de concours
2013
Award amount
25000
Program id
RGPIN
Program name en
Discovery Grants Program - Individual
Program name fr
Programme de subventions à la découverte - individuelles
Group en
Discovery grants programs
Group fr
Programmes de subventions à la découverte
Committee code
1502
Committee name en
Biological Systems and Functions
Committee name fr
Systèmes et fonctions biologiques
Area of application code
1201
Area of application group en
Advancement of knowledge
Area of application group fr
Avancement des connaissances
Area of application en
Life sciences (including biotechnology)
Area of application fr
Sciences de la vie (y compris biotechnologie)
Research subject code
6301
Research subject group en
Psychology
Research subject group fr
Psychologie
Research subject en
Sensory systems and perception
Research subject fr
Systèmes sensoriels et perception
Partie
2
Nb partie
5
Application title
Dynamics of Distraction: Physiological Correlates of Selective Listening Revealed in Brain Electrical Dynamics
Keyword
NSERC
Application summary
One of the most amazing skills of the human brain is its ability to discern individual streams of information, such as a single voice, from a complex mixture of many simultaneous sources of sound. This ability is called selective listening and it is one example of the broader phenomenon of selective attention. As we all know, selective listening is not perfect. Sometimes we are distracted by other sounds or even input to our other senses. Surprisingly, the field of Cognitive Neuroscience has not devoted much effort to understanding the underlying mechanisms of distraction. This is probably because we intuitively think of distraction as simply ""not attending"", but this is an error of oversimplification. What happens to auditory circuits when conflicting input disrupts their ability to effectively process sounds? Are there multiple mechanisms of distraction acting at different stages of cortical processing? Are there ways to prevent distraction by augmenting important signals in the auditory world? The research proposed here has two goals. The first goal is to test the theory that auditory distraction arises when oscillating neuroelectric signals in the brain become temporally uncoupled from the acoustic events in the auditory scene. The resulting phenomenon, which I call Distraction Decoherence, would disrupt the efficiency with which the brain accomplishes selective listening. The second goal is to develop ways to detect the neural signatures of distraction using state-of-the-art wireless EEG devices. If we can detect moments of distraction then we can develop neurotechnologies that redirect attention toward important events in the sensory world.