Canada Spends Logo

Explorez notre analyse du budget 2026

Grant: Project Grant

University of Ottawa

$313,650.00

Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Context based on the Implementation in Context (ICON) Framework

EF 2025-26

Résumé
Context differs between settings and changes over time, making its measurement critical to knowledge mobilization (KMb). However, a robust instrument to measure context in healthcare is lacking. In our previous work, we clarified what comprises context, resulting in the development of the Implementation in CONtext (ICON) Framework. ICON is comprehensive; it comprises 3 levels, 6 domains, 22 attributes, and >100 context features. We then conducted a scoping review of context instruments. Only a small number (n=13) of valid and reliable instruments were identified, and they measured only a few (5 of the 22) ICON attributes. We therefore developed an initial version of a single assessment instrument that is based on ICON. The instrument is designed for use by both KMb practitioners and researchers to assess context in any healthcare setting. In the proposed research, we will refine and evaluate the ICON instrument through four consecutive steps. In Step 1, we will assess the items contained in the ICON instrument for relevance to the ICON attributes. This will be done in a Delphi study with international expert panels. In Step 2, we will conduct cognitive interviews with frontline healthcare providers (the target population for completing the instrument) to assess their understanding of the meaning of the instrument's items. Following the interviews, experts will assess the pragmatic properties of the instrument. In Step 3, we will evaluate the reliability and validity of the instrument via surveys with frontline healthcare providers. In Step 4, we will develop a user manual for the instrument. At the end of the project, we will hold a series of interactive workshops to widely disseminate the instrument. Lack of a comprehensive yet practical instrument that measures context risks failed KMb efforts; the ICON instrument will fill this critical gap.
Programme
Project Grant
Bénéficiaire
Emplacement
Ontario, Canada
Type de bénéficiaire
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database

Tel que publié

Id
564216
Name
Squires Janet E
Region
Ontario
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Health Services and Policy Research
Theme2
Health systems / services
Prcname2
Knowledge Mobilization Science
Projecttitle
Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Context based on the Implementation in Context (ICON) Framework
Programtype2
Operating Grants
Orgnameinp2
University of Ottawa
Cihramount2
$313,650
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Project Grant
Keyworddelim
Context; Healthcare; Knowledge Mobilization; Measurement
Abstract
Context differs between settings and changes over time, making its measurement critical to knowledge mobilization (KMb). However, a robust instrument to measure context in healthcare is lacking. In our previous work, we clarified what comprises context, resulting in the development of the Implementation in CONtext (ICON) Framework. ICON is comprehensive; it comprises 3 levels, 6 domains, 22 attributes, and >100 context features. We then conducted a scoping review of context instruments. Only a small number (n=13) of valid and reliable instruments were identified, and they measured only a few (5 of the 22) ICON attributes. We therefore developed an initial version of a single assessment instrument that is based on ICON. The instrument is designed for use by both KMb practitioners and researchers to assess context in any healthcare setting. In the proposed research, we will refine and evaluate the ICON instrument through four consecutive steps. In Step 1, we will assess the items contained in the ICON instrument for relevance to the ICON attributes. This will be done in a Delphi study with international expert panels. In Step 2, we will conduct cognitive interviews with frontline healthcare providers (the target population for completing the instrument) to assess their understanding of the meaning of the instrument's items. Following the interviews, experts will assess the pragmatic properties of the instrument. In Step 3, we will evaluate the reliability and validity of the instrument via surveys with frontline healthcare providers. In Step 4, we will develop a user manual for the instrument. At the end of the project, we will hold a series of interactive workshops to widely disseminate the instrument. Lack of a comprehensive yet practical instrument that measures context risks failed KMb efforts; the ICON instrument will fill this critical gap.
Competitiondate
202603
Approvedterm2
3 yrs 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Squires, Janet E; Grinspun, Doris R.; Hutchinson, Alison M; Lockwood, Craig
Approvedterm
3 ans 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
~ $313,650~ $0~