Grant: Operating Grant: Industry-partnered Collaborative Research
Montreal Heart Institute
$211,072.00
Immediate vs. Delayed Stenting after Primary Percutaneous Reperfusion in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
EF 2012-13
Résumé
Stenting during STEMI has become a standard of care in industrialized countries. A primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) typically consists of restoring flow in the occluded coronary artery, after which the culprit lesion is immediately sealed with a stent to prevent a reocclusion of the artery. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that delaying stent implantation may be superior to traditional immediate stenting. During a STEMI, stents are implanted in a thrombotic environment which paradoxically impairs myocardial reperfusion because of distal embolization. The potential drawbacks of immediate stenting should be considered in the context of improved anti-platelet agents and safer systemic anticoagulation which have virtually eliminated the risk of an acute coronary reocclusion. Ideally, stents should be withheld until adjunctive anticoagulation has been administered long enough to reduce the thrombus burden.
The primary objective of the PRIMACY trial is to assess whether delayed stenting is superior to immediate stenting at improving cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. We hypothesize that delayed stenting will reduce the combined occurrence of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and target vessel revascularization at 9 months. Patients with STEMI successfully reperfused will be randomized to either immediate stenting or to delayed stenting where anticoagulation will be administered for 24 hours before stenting is allowed. The PRIMACY trial will be ran using Bayesian assumptions; an independent board of experts will determine the prior probability of efficacy and will supervise the evolution of the Bayesian monitoring. This trial is critically important because delayed stenting carries the potential to improve survival and quality of life in the large and vulnerable population of Canadian with STEMI who are in the greatest need of more effective therapy.
Programme
Operating Grant: Industry-partnered Collaborative Research
Bénéficiaire
Emplacement
Quebec, Canada
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database
Tel que publié
Id
278810
Name
Jolicoeur Marc E
Region
Québec
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Partnername
Boston Scientific (Maple Grove, MN); AstraZeneca Canada Inc.
Instname2
Circulatory and Respiratory Health
Theme2
Clinical
Prcname2
Industry Partnered Collaborative Research
Projecttitle
Immediate vs. Delayed Stenting after Primary Percutaneous Reperfusion in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Programtype2
Operating Grants
Orgnameinp2
Montreal Heart Institute
Cihramount2
$211,072
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Operating Grant: Industry-partnered Collaborative Research
Keyworddelim
Acute Myocardial Infarction; Anticoagulation; Coronary Artery Disease; Interventional Cardiology; Primary Pci; Randomized Trial; Stent
Abstract
Stenting during STEMI has become a standard of care in industrialized countries. A primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) typically consists of restoring flow in the occluded coronary artery, after which the culprit lesion is immediately sealed with a stent to prevent a reocclusion of the artery. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that delaying stent implantation may be superior to traditional immediate stenting. During a STEMI, stents are implanted in a thrombotic environment which paradoxically impairs myocardial reperfusion because of distal embolization. The potential drawbacks of immediate stenting should be considered in the context of improved anti-platelet agents and safer systemic anticoagulation which have virtually eliminated the risk of an acute coronary reocclusion. Ideally, stents should be withheld until adjunctive anticoagulation has been administered long enough to reduce the thrombus burden.
The primary objective of the PRIMACY trial is to assess whether delayed stenting is superior to immediate stenting at improving cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. We hypothesize that delayed stenting will reduce the combined occurrence of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and target vessel revascularization at 9 months. Patients with STEMI successfully reperfused will be randomized to either immediate stenting or to delayed stenting where anticoagulation will be administered for 24 hours before stenting is allowed. The PRIMACY trial will be ran using Bayesian assumptions; an independent board of experts will determine the prior probability of efficacy and will supervise the evolution of the Bayesian monitoring. This trial is critically important because delayed stenting carries the potential to improve survival and quality of life in the large and vulnerable population of Canadian with STEMI who are in the greatest need of more effective therapy.
Competitiondate
201303
Approvedterm2
3 yrs 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Jolicoeur, Marc E
Approvedterm
3 ans 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
Knowledge Translation Branch~ $211,072~ $0~