Grant: Project Grant
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
$100,000.00
Comparative Effectiveness of Repetitive Versus Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Major Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial
EF 2022-23
Résumé
Depression is an important public health issue, now ranked as the first cause of disability worldwide. It is currently estimated that around 300 million individuals around the globe and 1.76 million Canadians suffer from depression on any given year. Effective treatments exist for depression, such as antidepressants and psychotherapy, but many individuals will not respond to these approaches. In the last decade, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) has emerged as a safe, well-tolerated and effective treatment for this condition. TMS uses a powerful magnetic field to active neurons in the brain that are not functioning properly in depression.
Currently, two types of TMS exist, either Repetitive or Deep TMS. Repetitive TMS uses a small coil causing only superficial brain stimulation, while Deep TMS uses a larger coil that can reach deeper parts of the brain. It is theorized that Deep TMS might be more effective than Repetitive TMS in depression, but more evidence is necessary. It is an important research question to resolve in order to increase the quality and the overall effectiveness of TMS in depression.
Additionally, there is currently no way to determine if someone living with depression could benefit from TMS. Being able to predict if someone will respond or not to TMS before starting treatment could prevent useless interventions in people who have little odds of improvement and expedite remission in people who have good odds.
We will therefore carry a large trial to compare both types of TMS. Our hypothesis is that Deep TMS will be more effective than Repetitive TMS. Participants will also undergo biomarker testing before treatment to help us predict the odds of responding to TMS.
Programme
Project Grant
Emplacement
Quebec, Canada
Type de bénéficiaire
Not-for-profit organization or charity
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database
Tel que publié
Id
477258
Name
Miron Jean-Philippe
Region
Québec
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction
Theme2
Clinical
Prcname2
Behavioural Sciences - B-2
Projecttitle
Comparative Effectiveness of Repetitive Versus Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Major Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Programtype2
Operating Grants
Orgnameinp2
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Cihramount2
$100,000
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Project Grant
Keyworddelim
Biomakers; Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; Ecg; Eeg; Major Depressive Disorder; Mdd; Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; Rtms; Tms; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Abstract
Depression is an important public health issue, now ranked as the first cause of disability worldwide. It is currently estimated that around 300 million individuals around the globe and 1.76 million Canadians suffer from depression on any given year. Effective treatments exist for depression, such as antidepressants and psychotherapy, but many individuals will not respond to these approaches. In the last decade, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) has emerged as a safe, well-tolerated and effective treatment for this condition. TMS uses a powerful magnetic field to active neurons in the brain that are not functioning properly in depression.
Currently, two types of TMS exist, either Repetitive or Deep TMS. Repetitive TMS uses a small coil causing only superficial brain stimulation, while Deep TMS uses a larger coil that can reach deeper parts of the brain. It is theorized that Deep TMS might be more effective than Repetitive TMS in depression, but more evidence is necessary. It is an important research question to resolve in order to increase the quality and the overall effectiveness of TMS in depression.
Additionally, there is currently no way to determine if someone living with depression could benefit from TMS. Being able to predict if someone will respond or not to TMS before starting treatment could prevent useless interventions in people who have little odds of improvement and expedite remission in people who have good odds.
We will therefore carry a large trial to compare both types of TMS. Our hypothesis is that Deep TMS will be more effective than Repetitive TMS. Participants will also undergo biomarker testing before treatment to help us predict the odds of responding to TMS.
Competitiondate
202210
Approvedterm2
1 yr 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Miron, Jean-Philippe
Approvedterm
1 an 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
~ $100,000~ $0~