Canada Spends Logo

Explorez notre analyse du budget 2026

Grant: Doctoral Research Award: Canada Graduate Scholarships

University of Alberta

$105,000.00

Assessing the safety and efficacy of intra-arterial chilled saline infusion following focal ischemic stroke

EF 2020-21

Résumé
With ~55,000 new cases each year in Canada, the social, individual, and economic costs of this ischemic stroke are unparalleled. Despite advances in treating this disabling disease, not all patients benefit. This proposal aims to improve outcomes for all patients, but especially those that do not benefit from current therapies by investigating whether intra-arterial chilled saline (IACS) infusion is a safe and effective treatment. IACS treatment involves flushing the injured tissue with cold saline. Previous research has shown that IACS is beneficial. However, previous research is homogenous and not aligned with clinical reality (e.g., only studied in young, healthy, male rats, creating a mismatch with reality). In Year 1, we will develop our stroke model using hypertensive rats, a key risk factor. We will vary the stroke duration, and assess brain injury at 48 hours post-stroke. Our brain injury severity measurements in Year 1 will inform groups for Year 2 and 3. In Year 2, we will randomly assign male AND female rats to moderate, severe, and very-severe stroke, and either treat them with IACS or sham IACS. HYPOTHESIS: moderate and severe injuries will benefit from IACS treatment, but very-severe brain injuries may require more prolonged cooling. Our outcome measures are behavioural impairment (using established tests) and brain injury volume. Year 3 will be like Year 2, except rats will survive for 28 days, rather than 48 hours, and the treatment will be prolonged with a skull cooling device. Long-term studies are lacking in current literature. As before, we will assess behavioural deficits and brain injury. HYPOTHESIS: the combined hypothermia groups will have better outcomes than controls. Altogether, my research proposal will inform whether IACS is a safe and effective treatment for ischemic stroke by carefully considering clinical reality and addressing the limitations of current research (e.g., using multiple injury sizes, both sexes, hypertensive animals).
Programme
Doctoral Research Award: Canada Graduate Scholarships
Bénéficiaire
Emplacement
Alberta, Canada
Type de bénéficiaire
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database

Tel que publié

Id
439725
Name
Liddle Lane
Region
Alberta
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction
Theme2
Biomedical
Prcname2
Doctoral Research Awards - A
Projecttitle
Assessing the safety and efficacy of intra-arterial chilled saline infusion following focal ischemic stroke
Programtype2
Studentship Programs
Orgnameinp2
University of Alberta
Cihramount2
$105,000
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Doctoral Research Award: Canada Graduate Scholarships
Keyworddelim
Ischemic Stroke; Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion; Neuroprotection; Recovery; Stroke
Abstract
With ~55,000 new cases each year in Canada, the social, individual, and economic costs of this ischemic stroke are unparalleled. Despite advances in treating this disabling disease, not all patients benefit. This proposal aims to improve outcomes for all patients, but especially those that do not benefit from current therapies by investigating whether intra-arterial chilled saline (IACS) infusion is a safe and effective treatment. IACS treatment involves flushing the injured tissue with cold saline. Previous research has shown that IACS is beneficial. However, previous research is homogenous and not aligned with clinical reality (e.g., only studied in young, healthy, male rats, creating a mismatch with reality). In Year 1, we will develop our stroke model using hypertensive rats, a key risk factor. We will vary the stroke duration, and assess brain injury at 48 hours post-stroke. Our brain injury severity measurements in Year 1 will inform groups for Year 2 and 3. In Year 2, we will randomly assign male AND female rats to moderate, severe, and very-severe stroke, and either treat them with IACS or sham IACS. HYPOTHESIS: moderate and severe injuries will benefit from IACS treatment, but very-severe brain injuries may require more prolonged cooling. Our outcome measures are behavioural impairment (using established tests) and brain injury volume. Year 3 will be like Year 2, except rats will survive for 28 days, rather than 48 hours, and the treatment will be prolonged with a skull cooling device. Long-term studies are lacking in current literature. As before, we will assess behavioural deficits and brain injury. HYPOTHESIS: the combined hypothermia groups will have better outcomes than controls. Altogether, my research proposal will inform whether IACS is a safe and effective treatment for ischemic stroke by carefully considering clinical reality and addressing the limitations of current research (e.g., using multiple injury sizes, both sexes, hypertensive animals).
Competitiondate
202011
Approvedterm2
3 yrs 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Liddle, Lane
Approvedterm
3 ans 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
~ $105,000~ $0~