Canada Spends Logo

Explorez notre analyse du budget 2026

Grant: Discovery Grants Program - Individual

Carleton University

$62,000.00

Effects of roads and traffic on animal abundance

EF 2009-10

Résumé
Over the past 100 years roads have become a dominant landscape feature and this infrastructure continues to expand. Recently, ecological researchers and transportation planners have become increasingly concerned about the potential effects of roads and traffic on animal populations. Is this concern justified? How strong is the evidence that roads have a large impact on the distribution and abundance of animals? Although many studies have been conducted, almost all of them suffer from limitations in study design, which means it is not possible to estimate the effects of roads separately from the effects of other landscape changes such as deforestation, wetland loss, or agricultural intensification. My first objective is to rectify this situation; I will conduct empirical studies to determine the impact of roads and traffic on animal populations, independent of and in comparison to other landscape changes. Given that roads affect animal abundance, an important question for mitigation of these effects is, what kinds of species are most strongly affected by roads and how are they affected? For example, fencing and wildlife crossings can reduce road effects on species that are affected mainly through traffic mortality, while effects of traffic disturbance on animal abundance can likely only be mitigated by reducing traffic density in the landscape. I develop a set of hypotheses and predictions of how species characteristics - their movement ranges, reproductive rates, natural densities (territory/home range sizes), trophic interactions, and behavioural responses to roads, traffic emissions, and individual vehicles - determine the direction and size of the impact of roads on animal populations. My second objective is then to conduct a set of studies to test these predictions. The proposed research addresses three important applied questions: (i) to what extent should environmental and transportation agencies be concerned about the impacts of roads and traffic on wildlife? (ii) what kinds of species should be monitored for potential effects of roads? and (iii) what will be the most effective mitigation measures to minimize these effects?
Programme
Discovery Grants Program - Individual
Bénéficiaire
Emplacement
Ontario, Canada
Type de bénéficiaire
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
NSERC's Awards Data

Tel que publié

Application id
197309-2009
Name nom
Fahrig, Lenore
Department département
Biology
Organization id
23
Institution établissement
Carleton University
Province en
Ontario
Province fr
Ontario
Country en
CANADA
Country fr
CANADA
Fiscal year exercice financier
2009
Competition year année de concours
2009
Award amount
62000
Program id
RGPIN
Program nane en
Discovery Grants Program - Individual
Program name fr
Programme de subventions à la découverte - individuelles
Group en
Discovery grants programs
Group fr
Programmes de subventions à la découverte
Committee code
18
Committee name en
Evolution & Ecology
Committee name fr
Évolution et écologie
Area of application code
409
Area of application group en
Environment
Area of application group fr
Environnement
Area of application en
Environmental impact of economic activities (including agriculture)
Area of application fr
Effet des activités économiques sur l'environnement (y compris agriculture)
Research subject code
4701
Research subject group en
Evolution and ecology
Research subject group fr
Évolution et écologie
Research subject en
Animal ecology
Research subject fr
Écologie animale
Partie
1
Nb partie
5
Application title
Effects of roads and traffic on animal abundance
Keyword
NA
Application summary
Over the past 100 years roads have become a dominant landscape feature and this infrastructure continues to expand. Recently, ecological researchers and transportation planners have become increasingly concerned about the potential effects of roads and traffic on animal populations. Is this concern justified? How strong is the evidence that roads have a large impact on the distribution and abundance of animals? Although many studies have been conducted, almost all of them suffer from limitations in study design, which means it is not possible to estimate the effects of roads separately from the effects of other landscape changes such as deforestation, wetland loss, or agricultural intensification. My first objective is to rectify this situation; I will conduct empirical studies to determine the impact of roads and traffic on animal populations, independent of and in comparison to other landscape changes. Given that roads affect animal abundance, an important question for mitigation of these effects is, what kinds of species are most strongly affected by roads and how are they affected? For example, fencing and wildlife crossings can reduce road effects on species that are affected mainly through traffic mortality, while effects of traffic disturbance on animal abundance can likely only be mitigated by reducing traffic density in the landscape. I develop a set of hypotheses and predictions of how species characteristics - their movement ranges, reproductive rates, natural densities (territory/home range sizes), trophic interactions, and behavioural responses to roads, traffic emissions, and individual vehicles - determine the direction and size of the impact of roads on animal populations. My second objective is then to conduct a set of studies to test these predictions. The proposed research addresses three important applied questions: (i) to what extent should environmental and transportation agencies be concerned about the impacts of roads and traffic on wildlife? (ii) what kinds of species should be monitored for potential effects of roads? and (iii) what will be the most effective mitigation measures to minimize these effects?