Canada Spends Logo

Explorez notre analyse du budget 2026

Grant: Travel Awards - Institute Community Support

McGill University

$2,500.00

Assessing gaps in comprehensive HIV and women's health care across a typology of care for women living with HIV in Canada.

EF 2018-19

Résumé
Despite universal healthcare, women living with HIV in Canada experience barriers to comprehensive care. Strengthening clinical management beyond antiretroviral treatment requires an understanding of care gaps and care delivery. This study sought to answer the questions: 1) what care gaps occur for women living with HIV; and 2) do care gaps vary depending on where (clinics) and from whom (specialist of family doctors) women access care. We analysed data from the Canadian HIV Women's Sexual and Reproductive Health Cohort Study (n=1422). Women with HIV aged >=16 years, and residing in British Columbia, Ontario or Quebec participated from 2013-2015. Women currently accessing HIV-care (n=1242) were asked about components of women's care (pap test, pap test discussions, mammography, and reproductive discussions) and HIV-care (antiretroviral use, adherence, viral load, and viral load discussions). We defined comprehensive care as pap test, mammography, reproductive discussion, and HIV viral load. Overall, 62.3% women experienced at least one gap in care, the most common being reproductive discussions 65.3%, followed by mammography 38.7%, pap test 29.3%, and detectable viral loads 19.0%. Across the typology of care women accessed care from HIV-clinicians in HIV-clinics (70.9%), specialists in non-HIV clinics (17.6%), and family doctors in non-HIV clinics (11.4%). Women accessing care from family doctors in non-HIV clinics had nearly double the odds of not being currently on ART. Women accessing care from specialist in non-HIV clinics had 1.6 times higher odds of not having discussed the importance of regular Pap Tests, while having lower odds of having a detectable viral load. There were no observed differences in comprehensive care gaps across the typology of care. The majority of women in our study continue to experience gaps in care, irrespective of care type, indicating the need for models of care that address both HIV and women's health in a chronic disease era.
Programme
Travel Awards - Institute Community Support
Bénéficiaire
Emplacement
Quebec, Canada
Type de bénéficiaire
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database

Tel que publié

Id
400164
Name
O'Brien Nadia
Region
Québec
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Infection and Immunity
Theme2
Health systems / services
Prcname2
HIV/AIDS and/or other Sexually Transmitted and Blood-borne Infections (STBBIs).
Projecttitle
Assessing gaps in comprehensive HIV and women's health care across a typology of care for women living with HIV in Canada.
Programtype2
Undefined
Orgnameinp2
McGill University
Cihramount2
$2,500
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Travel Awards - Institute Community Support
Keyworddelim
Complex Chronic Conditions; Coordinated Care; Cross-Sectional Cohort; Hiv; Ics Travel Awards; Integrated Care; Models Of Care; Participatory Research Approach; Women'S Health
Abstract
Despite universal healthcare, women living with HIV in Canada experience barriers to comprehensive care. Strengthening clinical management beyond antiretroviral treatment requires an understanding of care gaps and care delivery. This study sought to answer the questions: 1) what care gaps occur for women living with HIV; and 2) do care gaps vary depending on where (clinics) and from whom (specialist of family doctors) women access care. We analysed data from the Canadian HIV Women's Sexual and Reproductive Health Cohort Study (n=1422). Women with HIV aged >=16 years, and residing in British Columbia, Ontario or Quebec participated from 2013-2015. Women currently accessing HIV-care (n=1242) were asked about components of women's care (pap test, pap test discussions, mammography, and reproductive discussions) and HIV-care (antiretroviral use, adherence, viral load, and viral load discussions). We defined comprehensive care as pap test, mammography, reproductive discussion, and HIV viral load. Overall, 62.3% women experienced at least one gap in care, the most common being reproductive discussions 65.3%, followed by mammography 38.7%, pap test 29.3%, and detectable viral loads 19.0%. Across the typology of care women accessed care from HIV-clinicians in HIV-clinics (70.9%), specialists in non-HIV clinics (17.6%), and family doctors in non-HIV clinics (11.4%). Women accessing care from family doctors in non-HIV clinics had nearly double the odds of not being currently on ART. Women accessing care from specialist in non-HIV clinics had 1.6 times higher odds of not having discussed the importance of regular Pap Tests, while having lower odds of having a detectable viral load. There were no observed differences in comprehensive care gaps across the typology of care. The majority of women in our study continue to experience gaps in care, irrespective of care type, indicating the need for models of care that address both HIV and women's health in a chronic disease era.
Competitiondate
201901
Approvedterm2
1 yr 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
O'Brien, Nadia
Approvedterm
1 an 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
HIV/AIDS~ $2,500~ $0~