Canada Spends Logo

Explorez notre analyse du budget 2026

Grant: Project Grant

University of Ottawa

$198,900.00

Effectiveness of patient decision aids and their elements for achieving quality health decisions: systematic review with network meta-analysis to inform and update the international standards

EF 2021-22

Résumé
Since 2000 our research team has created and tested decision aids and developed international standards. Decision aids are knowledge translation (KT) tools to help people make informed decisions that reflect what matters most to them. Decision aids (leaflets, videos, online tools) focus on a specific decision, provide information on options (benefits/harms), and help patients clarify what is most important to them. Our systematic review of 105 randomized trials showed decision aids compared to usual care improve knowledge, reduce decisional conflict, and increase patient involvement in decision making. But little is known about the effect of elements included in decision aids (e.g., patient stories, exercises to clarify values). There are over 100 new randomized trials that need to be added to update our last systematic review in 2017. We propose to study how well decision aids work compared to usual care and what elements of decision aids are most effective. These findings will be used to update the international standards and reach consensus on changes. We will conduct the study using an integrated KT approach with researchers and knowledge users on our international team. Knowledge users include patients, clinicians, and policy makers. We will use a systematic review of randomized trials and consensus methods to report on criteria to improve the quality of decision aids and avoid biased decisions. We will also evaluate the experience of team members with the integrated KT approach. Our output will report evidence on the effect of decision aids for people who are facing health decisions, how well each element within decision aids works, and consensus on updated standards. We will report the findings to researchers and knowledge users in Canada and internationally to inform health care services and health policies. Our study fits with CIHR's strategic plan priority: integrating evidence in health decisions by advancing the science of knowledge mobilization.
Programme
Project Grant
Bénéficiaire
Emplacement
Ontario, Canada
Type de bénéficiaire
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database

Tel que publié

Id
451493
Name
Stacey Dawn
Region
Ontario
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Health Services and Policy Research
Theme2
Health systems / services
Prcname2
Knowledge Mobilization Science
Projecttitle
Effectiveness of patient decision aids and their elements for achieving quality health decisions: systematic review with network meta-analysis to inform and update the international standards
Programtype2
Operating Grants
Orgnameinp2
University of Ottawa
Cihramount2
$198,900
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Project Grant
Keyworddelim
Decision Support Tools; Delphi Consensus; Health Decisions; Implementation Science; Knowledge Mobilization Science; Patient Decision Aids; Patient Preferences; Patient-Oriented Research; Shared Decision Making; Systematic Review
Abstract
Since 2000 our research team has created and tested decision aids and developed international standards. Decision aids are knowledge translation (KT) tools to help people make informed decisions that reflect what matters most to them. Decision aids (leaflets, videos, online tools) focus on a specific decision, provide information on options (benefits/harms), and help patients clarify what is most important to them. Our systematic review of 105 randomized trials showed decision aids compared to usual care improve knowledge, reduce decisional conflict, and increase patient involvement in decision making. But little is known about the effect of elements included in decision aids (e.g., patient stories, exercises to clarify values). There are over 100 new randomized trials that need to be added to update our last systematic review in 2017. We propose to study how well decision aids work compared to usual care and what elements of decision aids are most effective. These findings will be used to update the international standards and reach consensus on changes. We will conduct the study using an integrated KT approach with researchers and knowledge users on our international team. Knowledge users include patients, clinicians, and policy makers. We will use a systematic review of randomized trials and consensus methods to report on criteria to improve the quality of decision aids and avoid biased decisions. We will also evaluate the experience of team members with the integrated KT approach. Our output will report evidence on the effect of decision aids for people who are facing health decisions, how well each element within decision aids works, and consensus on updated standards. We will report the findings to researchers and knowledge users in Canada and internationally to inform health care services and health policies. Our study fits with CIHR's strategic plan priority: integrating evidence in health decisions by advancing the science of knowledge mobilization.
Competitiondate
202109
Approvedterm2
2 yrs 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Stacey, Dawn; Lewis, Krystina B; Smith, Maureen M; Volk, Robert J
Approvedterm
2 ans 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
~ $198,900~ $0~