Canada Spends Logo

Explorez notre analyse du budget 2026

Grant: Travel Awards - Institute Community Support

McGill University

$1,000.00

Scrutinizing Screening: an exploration of physician perceptions of clinical evidence on mammography screening for average-risk women

EF 2017-18

Résumé
Breast Cancer affects a large number of women in Canada. Mammography screening is the main test to detect this disease. Currently, there are programs to provide this screening test to women. There are both benefits and harms to this test for women at average-risk of getting breast cancer. Sometimes, this screening test finds cancers that never would have ended up harming a woman. Women may therefore have unneeded tests and treatments. These can cause emotional and physical pain. Different guidelines suggest that women should start regular screening at different ages. Some guidelines say each woman's risk of getting breast cancer and her preferences should guide this decision. Family doctors help women make these decisions. It is therefore important to know their thoughts on these guidelines and the scientific knowledge used to create them. This study aims to find out what family doctors think of research on mammography screening. Doctors registered to the Canadian Medical Association can receive an email summarizing new research on mammography through a program called Patient Oriented Evidence that Matters. These doctors reply with their thoughts on this research and whether it will be useful or not in practice. The research team reviewed these responses and organized them into different themes. Early analysis shows that doctors have a wide range of perspectives on mammography research. Differences exist in the way doctors value and use clinical research in their screening discussions with average-risk women. We expect that this project will create useful knowledge that will make family doctors think more about screening. It can also help us better understand the way doctors and patients talk about screening and what guides doctors in these conversations. The results may additionally help us understand the role of doctors in counselling women about screening.This study is an important starting point for future research on breast cancer screening.
Programme
Travel Awards - Institute Community Support
Bénéficiaire
Emplacement
Quebec, Canada
Type de bénéficiaire
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database

Tel que publié

Id
383053
Name
Siedlikowski Sophia
Region
Québec
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Cancer Research
Theme2
Health systems / services
Prcname2
Institute of Cancer Research
Projecttitle
Scrutinizing Screening: an exploration of physician perceptions of clinical evidence on mammography screening for average-risk women
Programtype2
Undefined
Orgnameinp2
McGill University
Cihramount2
$1,000
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Travel Awards - Institute Community Support
Keyworddelim
Ics Travel Awards
Abstract
Breast Cancer affects a large number of women in Canada. Mammography screening is the main test to detect this disease. Currently, there are programs to provide this screening test to women. There are both benefits and harms to this test for women at average-risk of getting breast cancer. Sometimes, this screening test finds cancers that never would have ended up harming a woman. Women may therefore have unneeded tests and treatments. These can cause emotional and physical pain. Different guidelines suggest that women should start regular screening at different ages. Some guidelines say each woman's risk of getting breast cancer and her preferences should guide this decision. Family doctors help women make these decisions. It is therefore important to know their thoughts on these guidelines and the scientific knowledge used to create them. This study aims to find out what family doctors think of research on mammography screening. Doctors registered to the Canadian Medical Association can receive an email summarizing new research on mammography through a program called Patient Oriented Evidence that Matters. These doctors reply with their thoughts on this research and whether it will be useful or not in practice. The research team reviewed these responses and organized them into different themes. Early analysis shows that doctors have a wide range of perspectives on mammography research. Differences exist in the way doctors value and use clinical research in their screening discussions with average-risk women. We expect that this project will create useful knowledge that will make family doctors think more about screening. It can also help us better understand the way doctors and patients talk about screening and what guides doctors in these conversations. The results may additionally help us understand the role of doctors in counselling women about screening.This study is an important starting point for future research on breast cancer screening.
Competitiondate
201802
Approvedterm2
1 yr 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Siedlikowski, Sophia
Approvedterm
1 an 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
Inst of Cancer Research~ $1,000~ $0~