Canada Spends Logo

Explorez notre analyse du budget 2026

Grant: Op Grant: Data Analysis - Reproductive, Maternal, Child and Youth Health

University of British Columbia

$75,000.00

Short interpregnancy interval and risk of subsequent adverse pregnancy outcomes: modifiers and mediators

EF 2019-20

Résumé
Purpose: Closely spaced pregnancies have poor maternal and infant outcomes. Existing guidelines recommend waiting from at least 18 to 24 months following previous childbirth until becoming pregnant again. It is not known, however, whether these guidelines suitable for all women. Women with a prior history of poor outcomes might have different optimal interpregnancy interval pertinent to them and waiting for 18 months might be associated with adverse outcomes. For example, among women who had pregnancy loss, current recommendations to wait 18 months before their next pregnancy may prolong their grief and emotional stress, whereas for women with a history of subfertility, waiting the recommended 18 months may increase their risk of infertility due to advancing maternal age. In this project, we will study whether associations between short intervals and adverse outcomes are the same or different among women with poor outcomes in the first pregnancy (fetal or newborn death, history of infertility treatment, or preterm delivery) and among women without poor outcomes in the first pregnancy. This will help us to create guidelines on optimal birth spacing for women with the poor outcomes in their first pregnancies. Methods: We will use a high-quality, population-based cohort including all pregnancies in British Columbia from 2004 to 2014 to examine relationships between pregnancy spacing interval and adverse outcomes (fetal or newborn mortality, poor fetal growth, preterm delivery) for women with a fetal or newborn death, infertility treatment, or preterm birth in the first pregnancy. Impact Study findings will inform women's and families' pregnancy spacing decisions to achieve the best pregnancy outcomes they can. These findings will guide clinicians providing counselling on optimal pregnancy spacing for women in these high-risk groups.
Programme
Op Grant: Data Analysis - Reproductive, Maternal, Child and Youth Health
Emplacement
British Columbia, Canada
Type de bénéficiaire
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database

Tel que publié

Id
421797
Name
Norman Wendy V
Region
British Columbia
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Human Development, Child and Youth Health
Theme2
Social / Cultural / Environmental / Population Health
Prcname2
Data Analysis Using Existing Databases and Cohorts
Projecttitle
Short interpregnancy interval and risk of subsequent adverse pregnancy outcomes: modifiers and mediators
Programtype2
Operating Grants
Orgnameinp2
University of British Columbia
Cihramount2
$75,000
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Op Grant: Data Analysis - Reproductive, Maternal, Child and Youth Health
Keyworddelim
Interpregnancy Interval; Interpregnancy Weight Change; Perinatal Loss; Pregnancy Complications; Pregnancy Demography; Pregnancy Outcomes; Preterm Delivery
Abstract
Purpose: Closely spaced pregnancies have poor maternal and infant outcomes. Existing guidelines recommend waiting from at least 18 to 24 months following previous childbirth until becoming pregnant again. It is not known, however, whether these guidelines suitable for all women. Women with a prior history of poor outcomes might have different optimal interpregnancy interval pertinent to them and waiting for 18 months might be associated with adverse outcomes. For example, among women who had pregnancy loss, current recommendations to wait 18 months before their next pregnancy may prolong their grief and emotional stress, whereas for women with a history of subfertility, waiting the recommended 18 months may increase their risk of infertility due to advancing maternal age. In this project, we will study whether associations between short intervals and adverse outcomes are the same or different among women with poor outcomes in the first pregnancy (fetal or newborn death, history of infertility treatment, or preterm delivery) and among women without poor outcomes in the first pregnancy. This will help us to create guidelines on optimal birth spacing for women with the poor outcomes in their first pregnancies. Methods: We will use a high-quality, population-based cohort including all pregnancies in British Columbia from 2004 to 2014 to examine relationships between pregnancy spacing interval and adverse outcomes (fetal or newborn mortality, poor fetal growth, preterm delivery) for women with a fetal or newborn death, infertility treatment, or preterm birth in the first pregnancy. Impact Study findings will inform women's and families' pregnancy spacing decisions to achieve the best pregnancy outcomes they can. These findings will guide clinicians providing counselling on optimal pregnancy spacing for women in these high-risk groups.
Competitiondate
201910
Approvedterm2
1 yr 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Norman, Wendy V
Approvedterm
1 an 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
Inst of Human Dev &Child &Yth~ $75,000~ $0~