Canada Spends Logo

Explorez notre analyse du budget 2026

Grant: Discovery Grants Program - Individual

Université de Moncton

$46,059.00

Investigating the reading processes captured by he missing-letter effect

EF 2013-14

Résumé
When asked to count or cross out the letter f in a sentence or paragraph like: FINISHED FILES ARE THE RESULT OF YEARS OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY COMBINED WITH THE EXPERIENCE OF MANY YEARS, people have greater difficulty detecting target letters in function than in content words. This is known as the missing-letter effect. In the example above, there are six fs, but most readers have difficulty finding the three fs in of. This is partly due because the f in of is pronounced as a v, but most importantly because it is a function word that carries little meaning. For instance, the same pattern of results is observed when f is pronounced the same in function and content words with more omissions when it is embedded in the function word for than in content words like fun, far, and fig (Saint-Aubin & Klein, 2001). The missing-letter effect has been used for more than four decades as a window on the cognitive processes involved in reading continuous text. The long-term goal of my research program is to better understand the basic reading processes. The short-term objectives of this proposal are to investigate the reading processes captured by the missing-letter effect in light of a new model we recently proposed: the Attentional Disengagement model of the missing-letter effect (Roy-Charland et al., 2007). According to this hypothesis, omissions are due to the allocation of attention on text by reading processes and to the efficiency of the detection process. Readers will be more likely to miss a target letter in a function than a content word because they will rapidly stop paying attention to the former. With my students, we will systematically test the new hypothesis with a variety of methodologies. First, we will investigate the nature of the information scanned by readers by varying the target to be detected. Second, we will investigate how good and poor readers differ at the letter search task by isolating the contribution of their reading and of their detection skills. Third, we will investigate the communalities between reading and listening for comprehension.
Programme
Discovery Grants Program - Individual
Emplacement
New Brunswick, Canada
Type de bénéficiaire
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
NSERC's Awards Data

Tel que publié

Application id
227608-2010
Name nom
SaintAubin, Jean
Department département
Psychologie, École de
Organization id
73
Institution établissement
Université de Moncton
Province en
New Brunswick
Province fr
Nouveau-Brunswick
Country en
CANADA
Country fr
CANADA
Fiscal year exercice financier
2013
Competition year année de concours
2010
Award amount
46059
Program id
RGPIN
Program name en
Discovery Grants Program - Individual
Program name fr
Programme de subventions à la découverte - individuelles
Group en
Discovery grants programs
Group fr
Programmes de subventions à la découverte
Committee code
1502
Committee name en
Biological Systems and Functions
Committee name fr
Systèmes et fonctions biologiques
Area of application code
1210
Area of application group en
Advancement of knowledge
Area of application group fr
Avancement des connaissances
Area of application en
Psychology
Area of application fr
Psychologie
Research subject code
6304
Research subject group en
Psychology
Research subject group fr
Psychologie
Research subject en
Cognitive science -- fundamental
Research subject fr
Science cognitive -- principes fondamentaux
Partie
4
Nb partie
5
Application title
Investigating the reading processes captured by he missing-letter effect
Keyword
NSERC
Application summary
When asked to count or cross out the letter f in a sentence or paragraph like: FINISHED FILES ARE THE RESULT OF YEARS OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY COMBINED WITH THE EXPERIENCE OF MANY YEARS, people have greater difficulty detecting target letters in function than in content words. This is known as the missing-letter effect. In the example above, there are six fs, but most readers have difficulty finding the three fs in of. This is partly due because the f in of is pronounced as a v, but most importantly because it is a function word that carries little meaning. For instance, the same pattern of results is observed when f is pronounced the same in function and content words with more omissions when it is embedded in the function word for than in content words like fun, far, and fig (Saint-Aubin & Klein, 2001). The missing-letter effect has been used for more than four decades as a window on the cognitive processes involved in reading continuous text. The long-term goal of my research program is to better understand the basic reading processes. The short-term objectives of this proposal are to investigate the reading processes captured by the missing-letter effect in light of a new model we recently proposed: the Attentional Disengagement model of the missing-letter effect (Roy-Charland et al., 2007). According to this hypothesis, omissions are due to the allocation of attention on text by reading processes and to the efficiency of the detection process. Readers will be more likely to miss a target letter in a function than a content word because they will rapidly stop paying attention to the former. With my students, we will systematically test the new hypothesis with a variety of methodologies. First, we will investigate the nature of the information scanned by readers by varying the target to be detected. Second, we will investigate how good and poor readers differ at the letter search task by isolating the contribution of their reading and of their detection skills. Third, we will investigate the communalities between reading and listening for comprehension.