Canada Spends Logo

Explorez notre analyse du budget 2026

Grant: Collaborative Research and Development Grants

University of Saskatchewan

$104,000.00

Omnivores versus carnivores: Can higher levels of pulse starch be tolerated in a wider range of species than corn?

EF 2015-16

Résumé
Carbohydrates are poorly tolerated in carnivorous species, while omnivores tend to tolerate higher dietary levels. However, since protein is often the costliest portion of an animal feed, maximizing the amount of carbohydrate produces a more economical feed. In order to balance these contradictory needs, this proposal aims to explore the use of slowly digestible pulse starches (pea, lentil, faba bean) compared to a more standard carbohydrate source such as corn starch. The slower digestibility of pulse starches are hypothesized to produce lower glycemic index, lower insulin levels and fewer adverse health effects compared to the rapid digestibility and higher glycemic index of corn starch. We predict that the health benefits of using pulse starches will be particularly pronounced in carnivorous species compared to omnivorous species. This prediction is based on the fact that carnivorous species tend to have lower amylase and are predicted to transport glucose to a lesser extent, both from the intestine and disposal into liver or muscle from the bloodstream. Carnivorous species are also predicted to produce higher levels of the reactive glucose metabolite, methylglyoxal, due to lower levels of key glycolytic enzymes which will in turn lead to higher levels of oxidative stress and inflammation compared to omnivores. In order to investigate these hypotheses, we will compare the carnivorous species, cat and rainbow trout, to omnivorous species, dog and tilapia in their ability to digest carbohydrate, glycemic responses to single feedings and health effects in longer-term feeding trials. Furthermore, since feeds for all of these species, both pet and aquaculture, are usually sold in a dry pelleted form, further understanding of how extrusion conditions affect starch structure and digestibility is needed before the full marketing potential of pulses can be realized. With this new, scientifically-supported information for the marketing of pulses, our industry partners will be able open new aquaculture markets and expand existing pet food markets, not only in North America, but also in Europe and Asia.
Programme
Collaborative Research and Development Grants
Emplacement
Saskatchewan, Canada
Type de bénéficiaire
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
NSERC's Awards Data

Tel que publié

Application id
446912-2013
Name nom
Weber, Lynn
Department département
Veterinary Biomedical Sciences
Organization id
16
Institution établissement
University of Saskatchewan
Province en
Saskatchewan
Province fr
Saskatchewan
Country en
CANADA
Country fr
CANADA
Fiscal year exercice financier
2015
Competition year année de concours
2013
Award amount
104000
Program id
CRDPJ
Program name en
Collaborative Research and Development Grants
Program name fr
Subventions de recherche et développement coopérative
Group en
Research partnerships programs
Group fr
Programmes de partenariat
Committee code
96
Committee name en
RPP Internal Decision Cttee
Committee name fr
Cté de décision interne - PPR
Area of application code
100
Area of application group en
Agriculture and primary food production
Area of application group fr
Agriculture et produits alimentaires primaires
Area of application en
Agriculture and primary food production
Area of application fr
Agriculture et produits alimentaires primaires
Research subject code
5504
Research subject group en
Animal biology
Research subject group fr
Biologie animale
Research subject en
Animal physiology and metabolism
Research subject fr
Physiologie et métabolisme des animaux
Partie
3
Nb partie
3
Application title
Omnivores versus carnivores: Can higher levels of pulse starch be tolerated in a wider range of species than corn?
Keyword
NSERC
Application summary
Carbohydrates are poorly tolerated in carnivorous species, while omnivores tend to tolerate higher dietary levels. However, since protein is often the costliest portion of an animal feed, maximizing the amount of carbohydrate produces a more economical feed. In order to balance these contradictory needs, this proposal aims to explore the use of slowly digestible pulse starches (pea, lentil, faba bean) compared to a more standard carbohydrate source such as corn starch. The slower digestibility of pulse starches are hypothesized to produce lower glycemic index, lower insulin levels and fewer adverse health effects compared to the rapid digestibility and higher glycemic index of corn starch. We predict that the health benefits of using pulse starches will be particularly pronounced in carnivorous species compared to omnivorous species. This prediction is based on the fact that carnivorous species tend to have lower amylase and are predicted to transport glucose to a lesser extent, both from the intestine and disposal into liver or muscle from the bloodstream. Carnivorous species are also predicted to produce higher levels of the reactive glucose metabolite, methylglyoxal, due to lower levels of key glycolytic enzymes which will in turn lead to higher levels of oxidative stress and inflammation compared to omnivores. In order to investigate these hypotheses, we will compare the carnivorous species, cat and rainbow trout, to omnivorous species, dog and tilapia in their ability to digest carbohydrate, glycemic responses to single feedings and health effects in longer-term feeding trials. Furthermore, since feeds for all of these species, both pet and aquaculture, are usually sold in a dry pelleted form, further understanding of how extrusion conditions affect starch structure and digestibility is needed before the full marketing potential of pulses can be realized. With this new, scientifically-supported information for the marketing of pulses, our industry partners will be able open new aquaculture markets and expand existing pet food markets, not only in North America, but also in Europe and Asia.