Canada Spends Logo

Explorez notre analyse du budget 2026

Grant: Project Grant

McMaster University

$1,941,831.00

SQUEEZE Trial: a trial to determine whether septic shock reversal is quicker in pediatric patients randomized to an early goal directed fluid sparing strategy vs. usual care

EF 2015-16

Résumé
Background: Sepsis arises when the body's response to an infection damages its own tissues and organs. Septic shock remains one of the most significant and potentially preventable causes of death in children worldwide. The American College of Critical Care Medicine has guidelines explaining how to treat septic shock that are used worldwide. Some recommendations are supported by high-level evidence while others are not. Goal: Improve understanding of how best to use IV fluid to treat septic shock. Rationale: Fluid is important in the treatment of septic shock, but too much IV fluid is harmful for patients. Patients who don't get enough fluid do poorly too. Plan: We will do a study called a randomized controlled trial where some patients are treated with a strategy that involves less fluid and more medications to help the circulation (blood flow) while other patients will receive usual care which typically involves a lot of fluid. Knowledge generated from our research will inform clinicians how best to use IV fluid to treat pediatric septic shock, a topic of significant controversy. We will also study substances the blood that may help clinicians recognize and treat sepsis faster, as well as the people's experiences with this research.
Programme
Project Grant
Bénéficiaire
Emplacement
Ontario, Canada
Type de bénéficiaire
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database

Tel que publié

Id
346027
Name
Parker Melissa J
Region
Ontario
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Circulatory and Respiratory Health
Theme2
Clinical
Prcname2
Project Grant Competition
Projecttitle
SQUEEZE Trial: a trial to determine whether septic shock reversal is quicker in pediatric patients randomized to an early goal directed fluid sparing strategy vs. usual care
Programtype2
Operating Grants
Orgnameinp2
McMaster University
Cihramount2
$1,941,831
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Project Grant
Keyworddelim
Critical Care; Emergency Medicine; Fluid Therapy; Pediatrics; Randomized Controlled Trial; Resuscitation; Sepsis; Shock; Vasoactive Medications
Abstract
Background: Sepsis arises when the body's response to an infection damages its own tissues and organs. Septic shock remains one of the most significant and potentially preventable causes of death in children worldwide. The American College of Critical Care Medicine has guidelines explaining how to treat septic shock that are used worldwide. Some recommendations are supported by high-level evidence while others are not. Goal: Improve understanding of how best to use IV fluid to treat septic shock. Rationale: Fluid is important in the treatment of septic shock, but too much IV fluid is harmful for patients. Patients who don't get enough fluid do poorly too. Plan: We will do a study called a randomized controlled trial where some patients are treated with a strategy that involves less fluid and more medications to help the circulation (blood flow) while other patients will receive usual care which typically involves a lot of fluid. Knowledge generated from our research will inform clinicians how best to use IV fluid to treat pediatric septic shock, a topic of significant controversy. We will also study substances the blood that may help clinicians recognize and treat sepsis faster, as well as the people's experiences with this research.
Competitiondate
201603
Approvedterm2
4 yrs 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Parker, Melissa J
Approvedterm
4 ans 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
~ $1,941,831~ $0~