Canada Spends Logo

Explorez notre analyse du budget 2026

Grant: Discovery Grants Program - Individual

Carleton University

$47,280.00

Effects of roads and traffic on wildlife populations

EF 2008-09

Résumé
Over the past 100 years roads have become a dominant landscape feature and this infrastructure continues to expand. Recently, concerns about the potential effects of roads and traffic on wildlife have been increasing. For example, roads and road kill are considered significant threats in the listing of several threatened species in Canada, and road mortality is the largest single component of mortality for some wildlife populations. However, to date there are almost no studies evaluating the relationship between road density and wildlife population sizes. My first objective is to determine the size of the impact of roads and traffic on wildlife populations, independent of and in comparison to other landscape changes such as habitat loss. Species that occur in low numbers, range widely over the landscape, and move onto roads irrespective of oncoming traffic should be most affected by traffic mortality. Species that avoid roads, i.e., they do not attempt to cross them, will be less susceptible to traffic mortality, but they may become cut off from required resources on the other side of the road, or their populations may become fragmented into smaller populations that are more vulnerable to extinction. On the other hand, species that do not avoid roads but avoid individual vehicles, i.e., wait for a break in traffic to cross the road, should be least susceptible to both road mortality and the barrier effects of roads. To date there has been almost no research aimed at testing these ideas. My second objective is to determine what kinds of organisms are most affected by roads and traffic at the population level. The proposed research directly addresses two important applied questions: (i) should government agencies (e.g., environment and transportation ministries) try to mitigate the impacts of roads and traffic on wildlife, i.e., are these effects generally large relative to other human impacts on wildlife, and (ii) in what situations should road expansion be avoided and current road effects be mitigated?
Programme
Discovery Grants Program - Individual
Bénéficiaire
Emplacement
Ontario, Canada
Type de bénéficiaire
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
NSERC's Awards Data

Tel que publié

Application id
197309-2008
Name nom
Fahrig, Lenore
Department département
Biology
Organization id
23
Institution établissement
Carleton University
Province en
Ontario
Province fr
Ontario
Country en
CANADA
Country fr
CANADA
Fiscal year exercice financier
2008
Competition year année de concours
2008
Award amount
47280
Program id
RGPIN
Program nane en
Discovery Grants Program - Individual
Program name fr
Programme de subventions à la découverte - individuelles
Group en
Discovery grants programs
Group fr
Programmes de subventions à la découverte
Committee code
18
Committee name en
Evolution & Ecology
Committee name fr
Évolution et écologie
Area of application code
409
Area of application group en
Environment
Area of application group fr
Environnement
Area of application en
Environmental impact of economic activities (including agriculture)
Area of application fr
Effet des activités économiques sur l'environnement (y compris agriculture)
Research subject code
4701
Research subject group en
Evolution and ecology
Research subject group fr
Évolution et écologie
Research subject en
Animal ecology
Research subject fr
Écologie animale
Partie
1
Nb partie
1
Application title
Effects of roads and traffic on wildlife populations
Keyword
NA
Application summary
Over the past 100 years roads have become a dominant landscape feature and this infrastructure continues to expand. Recently, concerns about the potential effects of roads and traffic on wildlife have been increasing. For example, roads and road kill are considered significant threats in the listing of several threatened species in Canada, and road mortality is the largest single component of mortality for some wildlife populations. However, to date there are almost no studies evaluating the relationship between road density and wildlife population sizes. My first objective is to determine the size of the impact of roads and traffic on wildlife populations, independent of and in comparison to other landscape changes such as habitat loss. Species that occur in low numbers, range widely over the landscape, and move onto roads irrespective of oncoming traffic should be most affected by traffic mortality. Species that avoid roads, i.e., they do not attempt to cross them, will be less susceptible to traffic mortality, but they may become cut off from required resources on the other side of the road, or their populations may become fragmented into smaller populations that are more vulnerable to extinction. On the other hand, species that do not avoid roads but avoid individual vehicles, i.e., wait for a break in traffic to cross the road, should be least susceptible to both road mortality and the barrier effects of roads. To date there has been almost no research aimed at testing these ideas. My second objective is to determine what kinds of organisms are most affected by roads and traffic at the population level. The proposed research directly addresses two important applied questions: (i) should government agencies (e.g., environment and transportation ministries) try to mitigate the impacts of roads and traffic on wildlife, i.e., are these effects generally large relative to other human impacts on wildlife, and (ii) in what situations should road expansion be avoided and current road effects be mitigated?