Grant: Travel Awards - Institute Community Support
Université de Montréal
$1,000.00
Urban area-level income and likelihood of non-recent colorectal cancer screening in Canada
EF 2016-17
Résumé
Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cause of death in Canada, yet the participation rate in preventive colorectal cancer screening remains low in the country (30%). Though many studies have explored individual-level determinants of screening, area-level determinants of screening remain to be studied in Canada.
Objective: This study aimed to assess the association between area-level income and both lifetime- and non-recent colorectal screening in Canadian urban settings.
Methods: Two waves of the nationally-representative Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) were pooled (2005, 2007), and restricted to urban-dwellers aged 50-75 who were at average risk for colorectal cancer (18,381 respondents). The outcomes assessed were lifetime non-screening (LNS), and non-recent screening (NRS), defined as neither having received a stool-based test in the previous 2 years, nor any form of endoscopy in the previous 5 years. 2006 Canadian Census Dissemination Area income linked to each participant was split into quartile groupings-where Quartile 1 represented the lowest income areas, and Quartile 4 represented the highest income areas. The prevalence of LNS and NRS in Quartiles 1-3 areas were compared to those in Quartile 4 areas.
Results: Average LNS and NRS were, respectively, 53% and 65%. Compared to Quartile 4 area residents, those living in Quartile 1, 2, and 3 areas were, respectively, 1.27, 1.25, and 1.15 times more likely to never have been screened in their lifetimes (95 % Confidence Intervals (CI): 1.18-1.26; 1.16-1.34; 1.08-1.24), and 1.18, 1.17, and 1.10 times more likely to not have been screened recently (95% CI: 1.11-1.24; 1.11-1.14; 1.04-1.16).
Conclusions: Area-level income appears to be an important predictor of lifetime and non-recent screening. The gradient observed can inform targets for interventions that address the social determinants of screening, while focusing on the overall low level of screening participation.
Programme
Travel Awards - Institute Community Support
Bénéficiaire
Emplacement
Quebec, Canada
Type de bénéficiaire
Academia
Type
Grant
Source
CIHR Funding Decisions Database
Tel que publié
Id
364480
Name
Blair Alexandra
Region
Québec
Country
Canada
Orgtype
Institution Paid; Research Institution
Instname2
Cancer Research
Theme2
Social / Cultural / Environmental / Population Health
Prcname2
Institute of Cancer Research
Projecttitle
Urban area-level income and likelihood of non-recent colorectal cancer screening in Canada
Programtype2
Undefined
Orgnameinp2
Université de Montréal
Cihramount2
$1,000
Cihrequipment2
$0
Programname2
Travel Awards - Institute Community Support
Keyworddelim
Ics Travel Awards
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cause of death in Canada, yet the participation rate in preventive colorectal cancer screening remains low in the country (30%). Though many studies have explored individual-level determinants of screening, area-level determinants of screening remain to be studied in Canada.
Objective: This study aimed to assess the association between area-level income and both lifetime- and non-recent colorectal screening in Canadian urban settings.
Methods: Two waves of the nationally-representative Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) were pooled (2005, 2007), and restricted to urban-dwellers aged 50-75 who were at average risk for colorectal cancer (18,381 respondents). The outcomes assessed were lifetime non-screening (LNS), and non-recent screening (NRS), defined as neither having received a stool-based test in the previous 2 years, nor any form of endoscopy in the previous 5 years. 2006 Canadian Census Dissemination Area income linked to each participant was split into quartile groupings-where Quartile 1 represented the lowest income areas, and Quartile 4 represented the highest income areas. The prevalence of LNS and NRS in Quartiles 1-3 areas were compared to those in Quartile 4 areas.
Results: Average LNS and NRS were, respectively, 53% and 65%. Compared to Quartile 4 area residents, those living in Quartile 1, 2, and 3 areas were, respectively, 1.27, 1.25, and 1.15 times more likely to never have been screened in their lifetimes (95 % Confidence Intervals (CI): 1.18-1.26; 1.16-1.34; 1.08-1.24), and 1.18, 1.17, and 1.10 times more likely to not have been screened recently (95% CI: 1.11-1.24; 1.11-1.14; 1.04-1.16).
Conclusions: Area-level income appears to be an important predictor of lifetime and non-recent screening. The gradient observed can inform targets for interventions that address the social determinants of screening, while focusing on the overall low level of screening participation.
Competitiondate
201701
Approvedterm2
1 yr 0 mth
Pinamesdelim
Blair, Alexandra
Approvedterm
1 an 0 mois
Cihrcontribution2
Inst of Cancer Research~ $1,000~ $0~