Canada Spends Logo

Explore our Budget 2026 analysis

Program directory · Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency

Inclusive Communities

Program code
BED01 (ACOA)
Core responsibility
Economic Development in Atlantic Canada
In Departmental Plans
2018-19 – 2026-27 · New since an earlier plan

What it does

For an economically diversified Atlantic Canada, communities must have the capacity and resources to be more inclusive; and for sustainable growth, entrepreneurs must be equipped to be competitive on the global market. Geographic communities and communities of interest, such as industry associations and non-profit organizations, need to invest in initiatives that stimulate economic growth. The Agency works with these communities through strategic investments to increase human capacity of people and organizations to increase and sustain growth and well-being. The lack of business capital available in rural regions impedes the establishment and expansion of small and medium-sized enterprises essential to the vitality and sustainability of communities. The Agency provides targeted support to Community Business Development Corporations (CBDCs) in Atlantic Canada, which provide essential investment capital focused on small rural businesses, and other services including business counselling and skills development. This program targets groups such as youth, women, Indigenous people, immigrants, including international students. It is well aligned with the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Act and its activities, which include support for enterprises, business associations and community organizations, as well as other activities aimed at improving the business environment.

Source: the department's Program Inventory, via GC InfoBase.

History and lineage

First appears in GC InfoBase's actual spending by program in 2018-19. The data does not record when a program was created; it may be older than its first appearance here, which is limited by the sources (program spending starts in 2010-11, Departmental Plans in 2018-19).

2018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-262026-272027-282028-29Inclusive Communities 2018-19: $38.9MInclusive Communities 2019-20: $35.5MInclusive Communities 2020-21: $126MInclusive Communities 2021-22: $48.4MInclusive Communities 2022-23: $35.8MInclusive Communities 2023-24: $37.6MInclusive Communities 2024-25: $31.4MInclusive Communities 2025-26: $30.2MInclusive Communities 2026-27: $29.1MInclusive Communities 2027-28: $28.2MInclusive Communities 2028-29: $25.8MInclusive Communities
Bars: spending by fiscal year (dark: actual; light: actual restated on the 2017-18 program structure; outlined: the latest plan's forecast; grey: related programs). Bands: each program in the lineage over the years it has data.
ProgramRelationYears with dataActual spending over those years
Inclusive CommunitiesThis program2018-19 – 2028-29$354M

No earlier or later program in the same department has a similar name.

Significant changes in scope and budget

Detected from the data: renames between plans, programs it appears to replace, merge with or split into (matched by name), year-over-year changes in spending of at least 25% and $5M, or in employees of at least 20% and 25 FTEs, linked budget measures, and results indicators added or dropped.

YearWhat changedSource
2020-21Spending $126M, against $35.5M in 2019-20 (+255%).Actual spending (GC InfoBase)
2021-22Spending $48.4M, against $126M in 2020-21 (−62%).Actual spending (GC InfoBase)
2022-23Spending $35.8M, against $48.4M in 2021-22 (−26%).Actual spending (GC InfoBase)

Success criteria

The program's indicators from its department's Departmental Results Framework: the target set in each year's plan, and the result reported the following year. Source: GC InfoBase.

Historical: targets against results

Percentage of ACOA-assisted firms that are majority owned by women
Expected result: Communities have the capacity and resources to be more inclusive and sustainable, and to grow
19%2018-19– no result12.4%2019-20✗ not met11.6%2020-21✓ met11.5%2021-22✗ not met11.2%2022-23✗ not met11.3%2023-24✓ met12.4%2024-25✓ met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2018-19≥ 19%2019—
There was a change in the methodology used by Statistics Canada in gathering the data used to calculate the percentage of ACOA-assisted firms that are majority-owned by women. The target had been set using the previous methodology. The target for this indicator will be revised in the 2020–21 to reflect changes in Statistics Canada’s methodology.
No result reported
2019-20≥ 19%202012.4%
There was a change in the methodology used by Statistics Canada in gathering the data used to calculate the percentage of ACOA-assisted firms that are majority-owned by women. Additional categories in ownership were added (e.g., equal and gender undefined in addition to men and women) and since then, the ratio of women via the total number of firms has declined. The target had been set using the…
Not met
2020-21≥ 11.5%202111.6%Met
2021-22≥ 12%202211.5%
For 2021-22, the result achieved is slightly below target while remaining within the desired range for this performance measure.
Not met
2022-23≥ 12%202311.2%
For 2022-23, the result achieved is slightly below target while remaining within the desired range for this performance measure.
Not met
2023-24≥ 11%202411.3%Met
2024-25≥ 11%202512.4%Met
Percentage points by which the business survival rate of CBDC-assisted clients exceeds that of comparable firms not assisted by CBDCs
Expected result: Businesses and social enterprises are able to secure and leverage capital (loans, loan guarantees and equity investments)
19%2018-19✗ not met19%2019-20✗ not met18%2020-21✗ not met21%2021-22✓ met17%2022-23– no result-0.6%2023-24✗ not met0.2%2024-25✗ not met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2018-19≥ 24%201919%
Despite not reaching the target for 2018-19, the business survival rate of CBDC-assisted clients remains notably higher than that of unassisted firms. The five-year business survival rate for CBDC-assisted firms was 68% after the crucial fifth year following start-up for the 2006 to 2016 period, compared to 49% for unassisted firms.
Not met
2019-20≥ 23%202019%
Despite not reaching the target for 2019-20, the business survival rate of CBDC-assisted clients remains notably higher than that of unassisted firms. The five-year business survival rate for CBDC-assisted firms was 68% after the crucial fifth year following start-up for the 2007 to 2017 period, compared to 49% for unassisted firms.
Not met
2020-21≥ 19%202118%
Despite not reaching the target for 2020-21, the business survival rate of CBDC-assisted clients remains notably higher than that of unassisted firms. The five-year business survival rate for CBDC-assisted firms was 66% after the crucial fifth year following start-up for the 2013 to 2018 period, compared to 48% for unassisted firms.
Not met
2021-22≥ 19%202221%Met
2022-23≥ 17%2023—
Target cannot be assessed at time of drafting. Data from StatCan agreement is not yet available.
No result reported
2023-24≥ 19%2024-0.6%
As a result of methodological changes, past and current baselines and target are no longer comparable with current and future results.
Not met
2024-25≥ 19%20250.2%
As a result of methodological changes, past and current baselines and targets are no longer comparable with current and future results.
Not met

Current: the 2026-27 plan's targets

Percentage of ACOA-assisted firms that are majority owned by women
Expected result: Communities have the capacity and resources to be more inclusive and sustainable, and to grow
11.5%2026-27

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2026-27≥ 11.5%2027—Planned
Percentage points by which the business survival rate of CBDC-assisted clients exceeds that of comparable firms not assisted by CBDCs
Expected result: Businesses and social enterprises are able to secure and leverage capital (loans, loan guarantees and equity investments)
0%2026-27

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2026-27≥ 0%2027—Planned

Future goals: targets due after 2026-27

No targets with a later due date.

Spending and employees: planned against actual

Spending

2018-19: $26.9M2018-19: $38.9M2018-192019-20: $26.8M2019-20: $35.5M2019-202020-21: $28.1M2020-21: $126M2020-212021-22: $27.7M2021-22: $48.4M2021-222022-23: $28.9M2022-23: $35.8M2022-232023-24: $30.7M2023-24: $37.6M2023-242024-25: $29M2024-25: $31.4M2024-252025-26: $30.2M2025-262026-27: $29.1M2026-272027-28: $28.2M2027-282028-29: $25.8M2028-29
Outlined bar: planned in that year's Departmental Plan (dashed: the latest plan, for years not yet reported). Filled bar: actual.
Show the numbers
Fiscal yearPlannedActual
2018-19$26.9M$38.9M
2019-20$26.8M$35.5M
2020-21$28.1M$126M
2021-22$27.7M$48.4M
2022-23$28.9M$35.8M
2023-24$30.7M$37.6M
2024-25$29M$31.4M
2025-26$30.2M—
2026-27$29.1M—
2027-28$28.2M*—
2028-29$25.8M*—

Employees (FTEs)

2018-19: 322018-19: 392018-192019-20: 322019-20: 322019-202020-21: 322020-21: 362020-212021-22: 332021-22: 432021-222022-23: 322022-23: 412022-232023-24: 322023-24: 382023-242024-25: 322024-25: 402024-252025-26: 322025-262026-27: 302026-272027-28: 292027-282028-29: 282028-29
Outlined bar: planned in that year's Departmental Plan (dashed: the latest plan, for years not yet reported). Filled bar: actual.
Show the numbers
Fiscal yearPlannedActual
2018-193239
2019-203232
2020-213236
2021-223343
2022-233241
2023-243238
2024-253240
2025-2632—
2026-2730—
2027-2829*—
2028-2928*—

Planned spending, plan by plan

Each row is one year's Departmental Plan and its forecast for the next three fiscal years; read a column down to see how the forecast for one year changed. The last row is what was actually spent. Click an amount for its source. Biggest changes in federal spending plans

Actual spending is from Departmental Results Reports and the Public Accounts, as published in GC InfoBase. FTEs are full-time equivalents.