Canada Spends Logo

Explore our Budget 2026 analysis

Program directory · Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission

Nuclear Fuel Cycle Program

Program code
BTJ01 (AECB)
Core responsibility
Nuclear Regulation
In Departmental Plans
2018-19 – 2026-27 · New since an earlier plan

What it does

This program regulates facilities associated with the nuclear fuel cycle, specifically nuclear processing facilities, nuclear waste management facilities, and uranium mines and mills. The program regulates all the lifecycle stages for these facilities – from site preparation, construction and operation, to decommissioning (or long-term management, in the case of some nuclear waste facilities).

Source: the department's Program Inventory, via GC InfoBase.

History and lineage

First appears in GC InfoBase's actual spending by program in 2018-19. The data does not record when a program was created; it may be older than its first appearance here, which is limited by the sources (program spending starts in 2010-11, Departmental Plans in 2018-19).

2018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-262026-272027-282028-29Nuclear Fuel Cycle Program 2018-19: $13.2MNuclear Fuel Cycle Program 2019-20: $12.6MNuclear Fuel Cycle Program 2020-21: $11.3MNuclear Fuel Cycle Program 2021-22: $11.2MNuclear Fuel Cycle Program 2022-23: $13.4MNuclear Fuel Cycle Program 2023-24: $14.2MNuclear Fuel Cycle Program 2024-25: $17.9MNuclear Fuel Cycle Program 2025-26: $17.7MNuclear Fuel Cycle Program 2026-27: $19.6MNuclear Fuel Cycle Program 2027-28: $19.8MNuclear Fuel Cycle Program 2028-29: $19.6MNuclear Fuel Cycle Program
Bars: spending by fiscal year (dark: actual; light: actual restated on the 2017-18 program structure; outlined: the latest plan's forecast; grey: related programs). Bands: each program in the lineage over the years it has data.
ProgramRelationYears with dataActual spending over those years
Nuclear Fuel Cycle ProgramThis program2018-19 – 2028-29$93.8M

No earlier or later program in the same department has a similar name.

Significant changes in scope and budget

Detected from the data: renames between plans, programs it appears to replace, merge with or split into (matched by name), year-over-year changes in spending of at least 25% and $5M, or in employees of at least 20% and 25 FTEs, linked budget measures, and results indicators added or dropped.

No significant changes detected.

Success criteria

The program's indicators from its department's Departmental Results Framework: the target set in each year's plan, and the result reported the following year. Source: GC InfoBase.

Historical: targets against results

Percentage of inspection reports issued according to service standard timelines
Expected result: Compliance verification is conducted in an effective, efficient and risk-informed manner
81%2018-19✓ met64%2019-20✗ not met73%2020-21✗ not met81%2021-22✓ met62%2022-23✗ not met80%2023-24✓ met87%2024-25✓ met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2018-19≥ 80%201981%Met
2019-20≥ 80%202064%
Delays occurred due mainly to competing internal priorities and subject matter expert availability. In some cases, there were delays caused by the time licensees needed to provide information to the CNSC and the time needed to analyze samples (e.g., soil).
Not met
2020-21≥ 80%202173%
In 2020-21 there were delays in issuance of inspection reports primarily due to uncertainties created by the COVID-19 pandemic which led to new challenges including the logistics of undertaking remote inspection work practices, and COVID-19 related delays such as delays in receiving information from licensees. Other challenges include competing operational priorities such as Commission Member Doc…
Not met
2021-22≥ 80%202281%Met
2022-23≥ 80%202362%
Inspections completed as scheduled, competing priorities caused the delay for the issuance of inspection reports. Completing priorities included the OAG Audit on Waste, licence applications and NSDF CMD. Review, comment and disposition took longer than anticipated to complete
Not met
2023-24≥ 80%202480%Met
2024-25≥ 80%202587%Met

Current: the 2026-27 plan's targets

Percentage of inspection reports issued according to service standard timelines
Expected result: Compliance verification is conducted in an effective, efficient and risk-informed manner
80%2026-27

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2026-27≥ 80%2027—Planned

Future goals: targets due after 2026-27

No targets with a later due date.

Spending and employees: planned against actual

Spending

2018-19: $14.5M2018-19: $13.2M2018-192019-20: $13.7M2019-20: $12.6M2019-202020-21: $13.4M2020-21: $11.3M2020-212021-22: $12.7M2021-22: $11.2M2021-222022-23: $12.3M2022-23: $13.4M2022-232023-24: $18.2M2023-24: $14.2M2023-242024-25: $15.3M2024-25: $17.9M2024-252025-26: $17.7M2025-262026-27: $19.6M2026-272027-28: $19.8M2027-282028-29: $19.6M2028-29
Outlined bar: planned in that year's Departmental Plan (dashed: the latest plan, for years not yet reported). Filled bar: actual.
Show the numbers
Fiscal yearPlannedActual
2018-19$14.5M$13.2M
2019-20$13.7M$12.6M
2020-21$13.4M$11.3M
2021-22$12.7M$11.2M
2022-23$12.3M$13.4M
2023-24$18.2M$14.2M
2024-25$15.3M$17.9M
2025-26$17.7M—
2026-27$19.6M—
2027-28$19.8M*—
2028-29$19.6M*—

Employees (FTEs)

2018-19: 922018-19: 812018-192019-20: 872019-20: 772019-202020-21: 822020-21: 732020-212021-22: 832021-22: 722021-222022-23: 782022-23: 812022-232023-24: 892023-24: 852023-242024-25: 922024-25: 932024-252025-26: 1022025-262026-27: 1082026-272027-28: 1102027-282028-29: 1072028-29
Outlined bar: planned in that year's Departmental Plan (dashed: the latest plan, for years not yet reported). Filled bar: actual.
Show the numbers
Fiscal yearPlannedActual
2018-199281
2019-208777
2020-218273
2021-228372
2022-237881
2023-248985
2024-259293
2025-26102—
2026-27108—
2027-28110*—
2028-29107*—

Planned spending, plan by plan

Each row is one year's Departmental Plan and its forecast for the next three fiscal years; read a column down to see how the forecast for one year changed. The last row is what was actually spent. Click an amount for its source. Biggest changes in federal spending plans

Actual spending is from Departmental Results Reports and the Public Accounts, as published in GC InfoBase. FTEs are full-time equivalents.