Canada Spends Logo

Explore our Budget 2026 analysis

Program directory · Global Affairs Canada

Mission Readiness and Security

Program code
BVF07 (EA)
Core responsibility
Support for Canada's Presence Abroad
In Departmental Plans
2018-19 – 2024-25 · Appeared and later dropped

What it does

As part of the Global Security Framework, the program establishes annual priorities for mission threat assessments, measures to keep mission personnel, information and assets secure, the provision of security and emergency management awareness training and exercises, mission physical security analysis, and the deployment of military security specialists and Readiness and Security Program Managers. This Program also supports on-site mission security inspections, vulnerability assessments, safety audits, and personnel security services.

Source: the department's Program Inventory, via GC InfoBase.

History and lineage

First appears in GC InfoBase's actual spending by program in 2018-19. The data does not record when a program was created; it may be older than its first appearance here, which is limited by the sources (program spending starts in 2010-11, Departmental Plans in 2018-19).

2018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-262026-27Mission Readiness and Security 2018-19: $62.6MMission Readiness and Security 2019-20: $53.3MMission Readiness and Security 2020-21: $55.5MMission Readiness and Security 2021-22: $60.7MMission Readiness and Security 2022-23: $59.6MMission Readiness and Security 2023-24: $68MMission Readiness and Security 2024-25: $63.2MMission Readiness and Security 2025-26: $69MMission Readiness and Security 2026-27: $61.2MMission Readiness and Security
Bars: spending by fiscal year (dark: actual; light: actual restated on the 2017-18 program structure; outlined: the latest plan's forecast; grey: related programs). Bands: each program in the lineage over the years it has data.
ProgramRelationYears with dataActual spending over those years
Mission Readiness and SecurityThis program2018-19 – 2026-27$423M

No earlier or later program in the same department has a similar name.

Significant changes in scope and budget

Detected from the data: renames between plans, programs it appears to replace, merge with or split into (matched by name), year-over-year changes in spending of at least 25% and $5M, or in employees of at least 20% and 25 FTEs, linked budget measures, and results indicators added or dropped.

YearWhat changedSource
2019-20Employees (FTEs) 140, against 83 in 2018-19 (+69%).FTEs (GC InfoBase)
2020-21Employees (FTEs) 217, against 140 in 2019-20 (+55%).FTEs (GC InfoBase)
2021-22Employees (FTEs) 122, against 217 in 2020-21 (−44%).FTEs (GC InfoBase)
2022-23Employees (FTEs) 256, against 122 in 2021-22 (+110%).FTEs (GC InfoBase)
2023-24Employees (FTEs) 99, against 256 in 2022-23 (−61%).FTEs (GC InfoBase)

Success criteria

The program's indicators from its department's Departmental Results Framework: the target set in each year's plan, and the result reported the following year. Source: GC InfoBase.

Historical: targets against results

Proportion of security risk mitigation measures that address the priority risks identified in the Departmental Security Plan that are implemented.
Expected result: Personnel are safe, missions are more secure and government and partner assets and information are protected.
68%2019-20– no result56%2020-21✗ not met69%2021-22✗ not met71%2022-23✗ not met69%2023-24✗ not met75%2024-25✓ met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2019-20—202068%
Target: 20
No result reported
2020-21≥ 75%202156%
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the changing security situations at missions abroad as well as shifting priorities, 21% of measures were placed on hold and a further 23% were unable to be completed.
Not met
2021-22≥ 75%202269%
Some delays due to continuing impacts of COVID-19 and to a cyber incident.
Not met
2022-23≥ 75%202371%
Project delays can be primarily attributed to procurement and contracting delays, global supply chain issues, technical challenges and increased costs, many of them pandemic related.
Not met
2023-24≥ 75%202469%
Achievement of this indicator target has been affected by the lasting impacts of the pandemic, as well as due to delays in obtaining technical studies and local permits in politically unstable areas; resources being diverted to higher operational priorities; and some IT projects being postponed in order to enable a rapid response to a major cyber incident. Interim security measures ensured servic…
Not met
2024-25≥ 75%202575%Met

Current: the 2026-27 plan's targets

No indicators in the 2026-27 plan.

Future goals: targets due after 2026-27

No targets with a later due date.

Spending and employees: planned against actual

Spending

2018-19: $60.1M2018-19: $62.6M2018-192019-20: $50.9M2019-20: $53.3M2019-202020-21: $52.1M2020-21: $55.5M2020-212021-22: $48.2M2021-22: $60.7M2021-222022-23: $76.4M2022-23: $59.6M2022-232023-24: $74.7M2023-24: $68M2023-242024-25: $71.9M2024-25: $63.2M2024-252025-26: $69M2025-262026-27: $61.2M2026-27
Outlined bar: planned in that year's Departmental Plan (dashed: the latest plan, for years not yet reported). Filled bar: actual.
Show the numbers
Fiscal yearPlannedActual
2018-19$60.1M$62.6M
2019-20$50.9M$53.3M
2020-21$52.1M$55.5M
2021-22$48.2M$60.7M
2022-23$76.4M$59.6M
2023-24$74.7M$68M
2024-25$71.9M$63.2M
2025-26$69M*—
2026-27$61.2M*—

Employees (FTEs)

2018-19: 952018-19: 832018-192019-20: 1452019-20: 1402019-202020-21: 2242020-21: 2172020-212021-22: 3,4302021-22: 1222021-222022-23: 2652022-23: 2562022-232023-24: 1082023-24: 992023-242024-25: 1032024-25: 1112024-252025-26: 1032025-262026-27: 1032026-27
Outlined bar: planned in that year's Departmental Plan (dashed: the latest plan, for years not yet reported). Filled bar: actual.
Show the numbers
Fiscal yearPlannedActual
2018-199583
2019-20145140
2020-21224217
2021-223,430122
2022-23265256
2023-2410899
2024-25103111
2025-26103*—
2026-27103*—

Planned spending, plan by plan

Each row is one year's Departmental Plan and its forecast for the next three fiscal years; read a column down to see how the forecast for one year changed. The last row is what was actually spent. Click an amount for its source. Biggest changes in federal spending plans

Actual spending is from Departmental Results Reports and the Public Accounts, as published in GC InfoBase. FTEs are full-time equivalents.