Canada Spends Logo

Explore our Budget 2026 analysis

Program directory · Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

New Frontiers in Research Fund

Program code
BNT04 (SSHRC)
Core responsibility
Funding social sciences and humanities research and training
In Departmental Plans
2019-20 – 2026-27 · New since an earlier plan

What it does

This program provides funding to support transformative, interdisciplinary and high-risk research. The program also supports research that helps respond to urgent issues, provides time-sensitive opportunities for international collaboration, as well as targeted funding for research in emerging areas. The program is administered by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) on behalf of the tri-agencies (the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council and SSHRC).

Source: the department's Program Inventory, via GC InfoBase.

History and lineage

First appears in GC InfoBase's actual spending by program in 2018-19. The data does not record when a program was created; it may be older than its first appearance here, which is limited by the sources (program spending starts in 2010-11, Departmental Plans in 2018-19).

2018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-262026-272027-282028-29New Frontiers in Research Fund 2018-19: $20.3MNew Frontiers in Research Fund 2019-20: $54.8MNew Frontiers in Research Fund 2020-21: $44.4MNew Frontiers in Research Fund 2021-22: $75.9MNew Frontiers in Research Fund 2022-23: $95.2MNew Frontiers in Research Fund 2023-24: $125MNew Frontiers in Research Fund 2024-25: $128MNew Frontiers in Research Fund 2025-26: $125MNew Frontiers in Research Fund 2026-27: $148MNew Frontiers in Research Fund 2027-28: $124MNew Frontiers in Research Fund 2028-29: $124MNew Frontiers in Research Fund
Bars: spending by fiscal year (dark: actual; light: actual restated on the 2017-18 program structure; outlined: the latest plan's forecast; grey: related programs). Bands: each program in the lineage over the years it has data.
ProgramRelationYears with dataActual spending over those years
New Frontiers in Research FundThis program2018-19 – 2028-29$544M

No earlier or later program in the same department has a similar name.

Significant changes in scope and budget

Detected from the data: renames between plans, programs it appears to replace, merge with or split into (matched by name), year-over-year changes in spending of at least 25% and $5M, or in employees of at least 20% and 25 FTEs, linked budget measures, and results indicators added or dropped.

YearWhat changedSource
2019-20Spending $54.8M, against $20.3M in 2018-19 (+170%).Actual spending (GC InfoBase)
2020-21Indicators dropped: Success rate for early career researchers.Departmental Results Framework (GC InfoBase)
2021-22Spending $75.9M, against $44.4M in 2020-21 (+71%).Actual spending (GC InfoBase)
2022-23Spending $95.2M, against $75.9M in 2021-22 (+25%).Actual spending (GC InfoBase)
2023-24Spending $125M, against $95.2M in 2022-23 (+32%).Actual spending (GC InfoBase)
2026-27Indicators added: Percentage of team members on newly funded projects who self-identity as members of an underrepresented groupDepartmental Results Framework (GC InfoBase)
2026-27Indicators dropped: Percentage of team members who are members of the four designated groups.Departmental Results Framework (GC InfoBase)

Success criteria

The program's indicators from its department's Departmental Results Framework: the target set in each year's plan, and the result reported the following year. Source: GC InfoBase.

Historical: targets against results

Percentage of projects that are high or medium-high risk
Expected result: Funded research is high risk
80%2019-20✗ not met98%2020-21✓ met100%2021-22✓ met96%2022-23✓ met97%2023-24✓ met100%2024-25✓ met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2019-20100% – 100%202080%
In the 2019-20 competition, it was noted that the two-stage evaluation process led to the panel members being more conservative, focusing their discussions more on the feasibility criterion than that for high risk in making their recommendations. To counter this tendency, NFRF has changed the review process for 2020-21 to ensure that high risk and high reward maintain their prominence in the revi…
Not met
2020-21≥ 95%202198%Met
2021-22≥ 95%2022100%Met
2022-23≥ 95%202396%Met
2023-24≥ 95%202497%Met
2024-25≥ 95%2025100%Met
Percentage of team members who are members of the four designated groups.
Expected result: Research teams are inclusive.
57%2020-21✗ not met60%2021-22✗ not met67%2022-23✓ met60%2023-24✓ met63%2024-25✓ met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2019-20—2020—
Women: 41% Indigenous: 6% Visible minorities: 17% Persons with disabilities: 0% Calculated for Principal Investigator, co-Principal Investigator and co-applicants. Since there was no target set for this indicator, it was difficult to efficiently analyze the performance. There will be a need to separate the groups for future reporting exercises.
No result reported
2020-21≤ 51%202157%
The target is incorrectly displayed and should be “At least 51%”. Therefore, the target is met.
Not met
2021-22≤ 50%202260%
An error has been made in the target entered for this indicator; it should have been "At least 50%". With this correction, the target has been met.
Not met
2022-23≥ 50%202367%Met
2023-24≥ 50%202460%Met
2024-25≥ 50%202563%Met
Success rate for early career researchers.
Expected result: Early career researchers (ECRs) are supported.
100%2019-20– no result

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2019-20—2020100%
The 2019-2020 result is actually 115% because a greater proportion of ECR-led applications were successful than the proportion of ECR-led Letters Of Intent (LOI) received. (35% LOIs were ECR-led; 38% of awards were ECR-led).
No result reported

Current: the 2026-27 plan's targets

Percentage of projects that are high or medium-high risk
Expected result: Funded research is high risk
95%2026-27

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2026-27≥ 95%2027—Planned
Percentage of team members on newly funded projects who self-identity as members of an underrepresented group
Expected result: Research teams are inclusive
50%2026-27

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2026-27≥ 50%2027—Planned

Future goals: targets due after 2026-27

No targets with a later due date.

Spending and employees: planned against actual

Spending

2018-19: $20.3M2018-192019-20: $54.3M2019-20: $54.8M2019-202020-21: $72.3M2020-21: $44.4M2020-212021-22: $75.7M2021-22: $75.9M2021-222022-23: $111M2022-23: $95.2M2022-232023-24: $127M2023-24: $125M2023-242024-25: $127M2024-25: $128M2024-252025-26: $125M2025-262026-27: $148M2026-272027-28: $124M2027-282028-29: $124M2028-29
Outlined bar: planned in that year's Departmental Plan (dashed: the latest plan, for years not yet reported). Filled bar: actual.
Show the numbers
Fiscal yearPlannedActual
2018-19—$20.3M
2019-20$54.3M$54.8M
2020-21$72.3M$44.4M
2021-22$75.7M$75.9M
2022-23$111M$95.2M
2023-24$127M$125M
2024-25$127M$128M
2025-26$125M—
2026-27$148M—
2027-28$124M*—
2028-29$124M*—

Employees (FTEs)

2018-19: 102018-192019-20: 182019-20: 142019-202020-21: 162020-21: 152020-212021-22: 212021-22: 252021-222022-23: 242022-23: 282022-232023-24: 312023-24: 312023-242024-25: 312024-25: 322024-252025-26: 332025-262026-27: 302026-272027-28: 292027-282028-29: 282028-29
Outlined bar: planned in that year's Departmental Plan (dashed: the latest plan, for years not yet reported). Filled bar: actual.
Show the numbers
Fiscal yearPlannedActual
2018-19—10
2019-201814
2020-211615
2021-222125
2022-232428
2023-243131
2024-253132
2025-2633—
2026-2730—
2027-2829*—
2028-2928*—

Planned spending, plan by plan

Each row is one year's Departmental Plan and its forecast for the next three fiscal years; read a column down to see how the forecast for one year changed. The last row is what was actually spent. Click an amount for its source. Biggest changes in federal spending plans

Actual spending is from Departmental Results Reports and the Public Accounts, as published in GC InfoBase. FTEs are full-time equivalents.