Canada Spends Logo

Explore our Budget 2026 analysis

Program directory · Veterans Review and Appeal Board

Review and Appeal

Program code
BWL01 (VRAB)
Core responsibility
Appeals
In Departmental Plans
2018-19 – 2026-27 · New since an earlier plan

What it does

The Veterans Review and Appeal Board’s program delivers the independent review and appeal process for service-related disability decisions made by Veterans Affairs Canada. It provides two levels of redress for Veterans, members of the Canadian Armed Forces and Royal Canadian Mounted Police, and their families who are dissatisfied with their disability pension and disability award decisions. The Board conducts hearings and issues written decisions. The Board conducts reviews and appeals of special award decisions made by Veterans Affairs Canada relating to attendance allowances, exceptional incapacity allowances and clothing allowances; hears the final level of appeal for War Veterans Allowance decisions; and adjudicates compassionate award applications.

Source: the department's Program Inventory, via GC InfoBase.

History and lineage

First appears in GC InfoBase's actual spending by program in 2018-19. The data does not record when a program was created; it may be older than its first appearance here, which is limited by the sources (program spending starts in 2010-11, Departmental Plans in 2018-19).

2018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-262026-272027-282028-29Review and Appeal 2018-19: $9.9MReview and Appeal 2019-20: $10.7MReview and Appeal 2020-21: $10.5MReview and Appeal 2021-22: $11.1MReview and Appeal 2022-23: $13.6MReview and Appeal 2023-24: $18.1MReview and Appeal 2024-25: $21.3MReview and Appeal 2025-26: $23.1MReview and Appeal 2026-27: $23.1MReview and Appeal 2027-28: $21.2MReview and Appeal 2028-29: $16MReview and Appeal
Bars: spending by fiscal year (dark: actual; light: actual restated on the 2017-18 program structure; outlined: the latest plan's forecast; grey: related programs). Bands: each program in the lineage over the years it has data.
ProgramRelationYears with dataActual spending over those years
Review and AppealThis program2018-19 – 2028-29$95.2M

No earlier or later program in the same department has a similar name.

Significant changes in scope and budget

Detected from the data: renames between plans, programs it appears to replace, merge with or split into (matched by name), year-over-year changes in spending of at least 25% and $5M, or in employees of at least 20% and 25 FTEs, linked budget measures, and results indicators added or dropped.

YearWhat changedSource
2023-24Employees (FTEs) 140, against 102 in 2022-23 (+38%).FTEs (GC InfoBase)
2024-25Employees (FTEs) 169, against 140 in 2023-24 (+21%).FTEs (GC InfoBase)
2028-29Planned employees (FTEs) 138, against 188 in 2027-28 (−27%).FTEs (GC InfoBase)

Success criteria

The program's indicators from its department's Departmental Results Framework: the target set in each year's plan, and the result reported the following year. Source: GC InfoBase.

Historical: targets against results

Percentage of applicants who provide positive feedback about their hearing.
Expected result: Applicants have an opportunity to tell their story and have their case heard
96%2019-20✓ met95%2020-21– no result95%2021-22– no result97%2022-23✓ met97%2023-24✓ met96%2024-25✓ met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2019-20≥ 95%202096%Met
2020-21≥ 95%2021—
This indicator is based on responses to questions from the Board’s Review Hearing Exit Survey, which is administered to applicants in-person following their hearing. During the global pandemic, in-person Review hearings had to be suspended, except for very limited circumstances. Results for this indicator are not available as the survey was not administered.
No result reported
2021-22≥ 95%2022—
This indicator is based on responses to questions from the Board’s Review Hearing Exit Survey, which is administered to applicants in-person following their hearing. During the global pandemic, in-person Review hearings had to be suspended, except for very limited circumstances. Results for this indicator are not available as the survey was not administered.
No result reported
2022-23≥ 95%202397%Met
2023-24≥ 95%202497%Met
2024-25≥ 95%202596%Met

Current: the 2026-27 plan's targets

Percentage of applicants who provide positive feedback about their hearing.
Expected result: Applicants have an opportunity to tell their story and have their case heard
95%2026-27

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2026-27≥ 95%2027—Planned

Future goals: targets due after 2026-27

No targets with a later due date.

Spending and employees: planned against actual

Spending

2018-19: $10.9M2018-19: $9.9M2018-192019-20: $10.9M2019-20: $10.7M2019-202020-21: $11M2020-21: $10.5M2020-212021-22: $11.2M2021-22: $11.1M2021-222022-23: $11.3M2022-23: $13.6M2022-232023-24: $15.8M2023-24: $18.1M2023-242024-25: $22.6M2024-25: $21.3M2024-252025-26: $23.1M2025-262026-27: $23.1M2026-272027-28: $21.2M2027-282028-29: $16M2028-29
Outlined bar: planned in that year's Departmental Plan (dashed: the latest plan, for years not yet reported). Filled bar: actual.
Show the numbers
Fiscal yearPlannedActual
2018-19$10.9M$9.9M
2019-20$10.9M$10.7M
2020-21$11M$10.5M
2021-22$11.2M$11.1M
2022-23$11.3M$13.6M
2023-24$15.8M$18.1M
2024-25$22.6M$21.3M
2025-26$23.1M—
2026-27$23.1M—
2027-28$21.2M*—
2028-29$16M*—

Employees (FTEs)

2018-19: 1012018-19: 842018-192019-20: 1012019-20: 832019-202020-21: 1012020-21: 852020-212021-22: 1012021-22: 972021-222022-23: 1012022-23: 1022022-232023-24: 1392023-24: 1402023-242024-25: 2032024-25: 1692024-252025-26: 2032025-262026-27: 2002026-272027-28: 1882027-282028-29: 1382028-29
Outlined bar: planned in that year's Departmental Plan (dashed: the latest plan, for years not yet reported). Filled bar: actual.
Show the numbers
Fiscal yearPlannedActual
2018-1910184
2019-2010183
2020-2110185
2021-2210197
2022-23101102
2023-24139140
2024-25203169
2025-26203—
2026-27200—
2027-28188*—
2028-29138*—

Planned spending, plan by plan

Each row is one year's Departmental Plan and its forecast for the next three fiscal years; read a column down to see how the forecast for one year changed. The last row is what was actually spent. Click an amount for its source. Biggest changes in federal spending plans

Actual spending is from Departmental Results Reports and the Public Accounts, as published in GC InfoBase. FTEs are full-time equivalents.