Senate
What Senate spent in fiscal year 2016-17: its net expenditure by standard object, from the Public Accounts of Canada, Volume II.
Reports through Parliament; the overview shows it in that ministry.
Spending, 2016-17
Net spending, 2016-17
$80.7M
spent by Senate, less revenues it kept
Share, 2016-17
0.0%
of the net spending of every federal organization
How did Senate spend its budget in 2016-17?
By standard object. Revenues it kept are negative and netted against its spending. Transfer payments are broken into their largest named programs.
Spending by standard object, 2016-17
Personnel
Transportation and communications
Professional and special services
Acquisition of machinery and equipment
Rentals
Utilities, materials and supplies
Repair and maintenance
Information
Transfer payments
Other subsidies and payments
$64.3M
$7.9M
$3.3M
$1.6M
$1.2M
$770K
$625K
$520K
$464K
-$4K
Total: $80.7M.
Spending by program, 2016-17
The same net spending by program, as GC InfoBase reports program actuals: $80.7M in all. Select a program for its history, plans and results.
Workforce, 2016-17
Personnel spending
$64.3M
salaries, wages and benefits (the personnel standard object)
A full-time equivalent is a measure of employment, not a headcount: two half-time employees are one FTE. Personnel spending includes benefits and pension contributions, so per FTE it is not an average salary.
Transfer payment programs, 2016-17
The grants, contributions and other transfers Senate paid, program by program: $464K in all, against $464K for the transfer payments object above (the Public Accounts publish the two tables separately).
Senate’s share of federal net spending
Other organizations in Parliament
Sources
- Public Accounts of Canada 2017, Volume II: Ministerial expenditures by standard object (Table 3)
- Public Accounts of Canada, Volume II: Transfer payments (multi-year open data)
- GC InfoBase – Federal Programs – Actual and Planned Spending (programs_spending.csv)
Department figures are net expenditure (Public Accounts, Volume II), which doesn’t add up to the accrual expenses of the overview’s headline. See the methodology.
