Canada Spends Logo

Explore our Budget 2026 analysis

Program directory · Impact Assessment Agency of Canada

Impact Assessment Policy Development

Program code
BGV01 (CEAA)
Core responsibility
Impact Assessment
In Departmental Plans
2018-19 – 2020-21 · Appeared and later dropped

What it does

The Impact Assessment (IA) Policy Program develops and promotes robust policies and practices for high quality IA in accordance with the Impact Assessment Act. This is achieved by building and reinforcing policies, procedures, and criteria for the conduct of federal IA, by promoting cooperation and coordinated action between the federal government and other jurisdictions, by promoting communication and cooperation with Indigenous peoples, and by developing guidance and training for IA practitioners. IA Policy enables continuous improvement through research, monitoring, analysis, and advice. Recommendations inform the development of new regulatory and policy approaches, as well as the revision of guidance, training and knowledge-based instruments. The program also provides support for the conduct of IA through various means, such as federal-provincial agreements and policy criteria. This program uses funding from the following transfer payment: Impact Assessment-related Research Program.

Source: the department's Program Inventory, via GC InfoBase.

History and lineage

First appears in GC InfoBase's actual spending by program in 2018-19. The data does not record when a program was created; it may be older than its first appearance here, which is limited by the sources (program spending starts in 2010-11, Departmental Plans in 2018-19).

2018-192019-202020-212021-222022-23Impact Assessment Policy Development 2018-19: $7.4MImpact Assessment Policy Development 2019-20: $18.8MImpact Assessment Policy Development 2020-21: $30.3MImpact Assessment Policy Development 2021-22: $29.2MImpact Assessment Policy Development 2022-23: $29.4MImpact Assessment Policy DevelopmentEnvironmental Assessment P…Impact Assess…
Bars: spending by fiscal year (dark: actual; light: actual restated on the 2017-18 program structure; outlined: the latest plan's forecast; grey: related programs). Bands: each program in the lineage over the years it has data. The line at the bottom shows this program's names over time.
ProgramRelationYears with dataActual spending over those years
Impact Assessment Policy DevelopmentThis program2018-19 – 2022-23$56.5M

No earlier or later program in the same department has a similar name.

Significant changes in scope and budget

Detected from the data: renames between plans, programs it appears to replace, merge with or split into (matched by name), year-over-year changes in spending of at least 25% and $5M, or in employees of at least 20% and 25 FTEs, linked budget measures, and results indicators added or dropped.

YearWhat changedSource
2019-20Employees (FTEs) 106, against 63 in 2018-19 (+68%).FTEs (GC InfoBase)
2019-20Spending $18.8M, against $7.4M in 2018-19 (+155%).Actual spending (GC InfoBase)
2020-21Renamed from “Environmental Assessment Policy Development” to “Impact Assessment Policy Development”.GC InfoBase program names by year
2020-21Spending $30.3M, against $18.8M in 2019-20 (+61%).Actual spending (GC InfoBase)

Success criteria

The program's indicators from its department's Departmental Results Framework: the target set in each year's plan, and the result reported the following year. Source: GC InfoBase.

Historical: targets against results

Composite of performance indicators for the delivery of assessments.
Expected result: Support to government decision makers.
100%2019-20✓ met100%2020-21✓ met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2019-20≥ 90%2020100%Met
2020-21≥ 90%2021100%Met
Percentage of guidance documents in the development of which the public, Indigenous peoples and stakeholders participate.
Expected result: Increase awareness of process from participants and proponents.
93%2019-20✓ met100%2020-21✓ met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2019-20≥ 90%202093%Met
2020-21≥ 90%2021100%Met

Current: the 2026-27 plan's targets

No indicators in the 2026-27 plan.

Future goals: targets due after 2026-27

No targets with a later due date.

Spending and employees: planned against actual

Spending

2018-19: $4.2M2018-19: $7.4M2018-192019-20: $27.2M2019-20: $18.8M2019-202020-21: $28.4M2020-21: $30.3M2020-212021-22: $29.2M2021-222022-23: $29.4M2022-23
Outlined bar: planned in that year's Departmental Plan (dashed: the latest plan, for years not yet reported). Filled bar: actual.
Show the numbers
Fiscal yearPlannedActual
2018-19$4.2M$7.4M
2019-20$27.2M$18.8M
2020-21$28.4M$30.3M
2021-22$29.2M*—
2022-23$29.4M*—

Employees (FTEs)

2018-19: 422018-19: 632018-192019-20: 1072019-20: 1062019-202020-21: 1052020-21: 1112020-212021-22: 992021-222022-23: 1002022-23
Outlined bar: planned in that year's Departmental Plan (dashed: the latest plan, for years not yet reported). Filled bar: actual.
Show the numbers
Fiscal yearPlannedActual
2018-194263
2019-20107106
2020-21105111
2021-2299*—
2022-23100*—

Planned spending, plan by plan

Each row is one year's Departmental Plan and its forecast for the next three fiscal years; read a column down to see how the forecast for one year changed. The last row is what was actually spent. Click an amount for its source. Biggest changes in federal spending plans

Actual spending is from Departmental Results Reports and the Public Accounts, as published in GC InfoBase. FTEs are full-time equivalents.