Canada Spends Logo

Explore our Budget 2026 analysis

Program directory · Spending

Impact Assessment Agency of Canada

Results and programs. GC InfoBase reports 8 programs of this department, in its Departmental Plans or its actual spending; 3 are current (in the latest plan or, for a program in no plan, with actual spending in the latest year).

Actual spending, 2024-25
$105M
Planned, 2025-26 (latest plan)
$115M
Core responsibilities with indicators
1

Spending and employees

Totals of the department's programs: actual spending where reported, then the latest plan.

Spending

2010-11: $29M2010-112011-12: $29.6M2011-122012-13: $27.9M2012-132013-14: $32.6M2013-142014-15: $29.8M2014-152015-16: $29.2M2015-162016-17: $38.7M2016-172017-18: $39.8M2017-182018-19: $47.6M2018-192019-20: $63.4M2019-202020-21: $76.9M2020-212021-22: $140M2021-222022-23: $142M2022-232023-24: $97.5M2023-242024-25: $105M2024-252025-26: $115M2025-262026-27: $109M2026-272027-28: $109M2027-282028-29: $37.3M2028-29
Outlined bar: planned in that year's Departmental Plan (dashed: the latest plan, for years not yet reported). Filled bar: actual.
Show the numbers
Fiscal yearPlannedActual
2010-11—$29M
2011-12—$29.6M
2012-13—$27.9M
2013-14—$32.6M
2014-15—$29.8M
2015-16—$29.2M
2016-17—$38.7M
2017-18—$39.8M
2018-19—$47.6M
2019-20—$63.4M
2020-21—$76.9M
2021-22—$140M
2022-23—$142M
2023-24—$97.5M
2024-25—$105M
2025-26$115M*—
2026-27$109M*—
2027-28$109M*—
2028-29$37.3M*—

Employees (FTEs)

2011-12: 2262011-122012-13: 2212012-132013-14: 2332013-142014-15: 2332014-152015-16: 2362015-162016-17: 2652016-172017-18: 2712017-182018-19: 3092018-192019-20: 4052019-202020-21: 4462020-212021-22: 8032021-222022-23: 8012022-232023-24: 5082023-242024-25: 5672024-252025-26: 6002025-262026-27: 5792026-272027-28: 5652027-282028-29: 2032028-29
Outlined bar: planned in that year's Departmental Plan (dashed: the latest plan, for years not yet reported). Filled bar: actual.
Show the numbers
Fiscal yearPlannedActual
2011-12—226
2012-13—221
2013-14—233
2014-15—233
2015-16—236
2016-17—265
2017-18—271
2018-19—309
2019-20—405
2020-21—446
2021-22—803
2022-23—801
2023-24—508
2024-25—567
2025-26600*—
2026-27579*—
2027-28565*—
2028-29203*—

Results at a glance

How many indicators met their target each year, as reported in the Departmental Results Reports. Source: GC InfoBase.

Core responsibility indicators

Report yearMetNot metNo result reportedNot yet dueShare met (of met and not met)
2019-204000100%
2020-214000100%
2021-221030100%
2022-23112050%
2023-24211067%
2024-25211067%

Program indicators

Report yearMetNot metNo result reportedNot yet dueShare met (of met and not met)
2019-207000100%
2020-217000100%
2021-221020100%
2022-233000100%
2023-241020100%
2024-251020100%

Results by core responsibility

Impact Assessment (15 indicators)

Historical: targets against results

Percentage of Indigenous groups participating in assessment-related engagement / consultation activities who indicate they were engaged meaningfully in the assessment process
0%2021-22– no result
2022-23Target: To be determined in 2022–23 (2023)Result: Not availableNo result reported
Percentage of Indigenous groups who agree they have a productive and collaborative relationship with IAAC
70%2023-24– no result70%2024-25– no result
2024-25Target: ≥ 70% (2025)Result: —No result reported
Percentage of projects for which reporting indicates that the vast majority of mitigation measures set out in the Decision Statement effectively address adverse effects of the project
90%2021-22– no result90%2022-23– no result100%2023-24✓ met100%2024-25✓ met
2024-25Target: ≥ 90% (2025)Result: 100%Met
Percentage of stakeholders and Indigenous groups participating in assessment-related engagement / consultation activities who agree they were engaged meaningfully in the assessment process
88%2023-24✗ not met78%2024-25✗ not met
2024-25Target: ≥ 90% (2025)Result: 78%Not met
Percentage of stakeholders and Indigenous groups who agree that scientific and evidence-based information and Indigenous Knowledge on key health, social, economic, and environmental effects are accessible
99%2023-24✓ met83%2024-25✓ met
2024-25Target: ≥ 60% (2025)Result: 83%Met
Percentage of assessment reports provided to decision-makers that include a science-based assessment of the project, and a summary of public comments and how Indigenous knowledge and perspectives were considered
100%2021-22✓ met100%2022-23✓ met
2022-23Target: ≥ 100% (2023)Result: 100%Met
Percentage of public and stakeholder participants in assessment-related engagement/consultation activities that indicate IAAC’s engagement was meaningful
0%2021-22– no result
2022-23Target: To be determined in 2022–23 (2023)Result: 78%Not met
Percentage of assessments in which Indigenous peoples have participated
100%2019-20✓ met100%2020-21✓ met
2020-21Target: ≥ 100% (2021)Result: 100%Met
Percentage of assessments in which the public and stakeholders have participated
100%2019-20✓ met100%2020-21✓ met
2020-21Target: ≥ 100% (2021)Result: 100%Met
Percentage of projects in which mitigation measures have proven to be effective
100%2019-20✓ met100%2020-21✓ met
2020-21Target: ≥ 90% (2021)Result: 100%Met
Percentage of projects that are in compliance with decision statement conditions
90%2019-20✓ met92%2020-21✓ met
2020-21Target: ≥ 90% (2021)Result: 92%Met

Current: the 2026-27 plan's targets

Percentage of assessments conducted within targeted timelines
2026-27Target: ≥ 80% (2027)Result: —Planned
Percentage of projects with follow-up program results that indicated the vast majority of mitigation measures effectively address adverse effects within federal jurisdiction
2026-27Target: ≥ 90% (2027)Result: —Planned

Future goals: targets due after 2026-27

Percentage of Indigenous groups participating in assessment-related engagement / consultation activities who indicate they were engaged meaningfully in the assessment process
2026-27Target: ≥ 80% (2028)Result: —Planned
Percentage of project assessments where “one project, one review” applies
2026-27Target: ≥ 80% (2028)Result: —Planned
Percentage reduction in the time needed to complete assessment processes, compared to baseline
2026-27Target: ≥ 50% (2028)Result: —Planned

Programs

ProgramCore responsibilityStatusLatest plan, first yearLast actualIndicators
Assessment Administration, Conduct, and Monitoring · BGV03Impact AssessmentNew since an earlier plan$62.4M
2026-27
$59.3M
2024-25
2
Internal Services · ISS20—New since an earlier plan$27.4M
2026-27
$26.1M
2024-25
0
Indigenous Relations and Engagement · BGV04Impact AssessmentNew since an earlier plan$19.7M
2026-27
$19.4M
2024-25
4
Assessment Delivery · BGV02Impact AssessmentAppeared and later dropped$38.2M
2020-21
$36.9M
2020-21
5
Impact Assessment Policy Development · BGV01Impact AssessmentAppeared and later dropped$28.4M
2020-21
$30.3M
2020-21
2
Environmental Assessment Delivery Program · AGG00High quality and timely environmental assessments of major projects to protect the environment and support economic growth.Not in a Departmental Plan—
$26.9M
2017-18
0
Internal Services · ISC02—Not in a Departmental Plan—
$6.7M
2017-18
0
Environmental Assessment Policy Program · AGH00High quality and timely environmental assessments of major projects to protect the environment and support economic growth.Not in a Departmental Plan—
$6.2M
2017-18
0