Canada Spends Logo

Explore our Budget 2026 analysis

Program directory · Impact Assessment Agency of Canada

Assessment Administration, Conduct, and Monitoring

Program code
BGV03 (CEAA)
Core responsibility
Impact Assessment
In Departmental Plans
2021-22 – 2026-27 · New since an earlier plan

What it does

This program ensures the effective delivery of the Agency’s mandate to conduct assessments under the Impact Assessment Act and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012. This is achieved through the development and promotion of policies and practices for federal assessments, conduct of high quality assessments of designated projects, and monitoring and verification of compliance with mitigation measures, thereby preventing or reducing adverse effects while supporting economic growth. The program provides support for the conduct of assessments through various means, such as assessments by review panel, regional and strategic assessments, designation requests, and federal-provincial agreements. The Agency works with other jurisdictions to avoid duplication of assessment activities (where possible) to increase efficiency and provide certainty for all participants. The Agency ensures that assessment processes include meaningful participation of the public and Indigenous groups, with financial support made available through the Participant Funding Program. The Agency enables continuous improvement through research, monitoring, analysis, and advice. Recommendations will inform the development of new regulatory and policy approaches, as well as the revision of guidance, training and knowledge-based instruments for practitioners. This program uses funding from the following transfer payment programs: Impact Assessment-related Research Program, Participant Funding Program.

Source: the department's Program Inventory, via GC InfoBase.

History and lineage

First appears in GC InfoBase's actual spending by program in 2021-22. The data does not record when a program was created; it may be older than its first appearance here, which is limited by the sources (program spending starts in 2010-11, Departmental Plans in 2018-19).

2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-262026-272027-282028-29Assessment Administration, Conduct, and Monitoring 2021-22: $49MAssessment Administration, Conduct, and Monitoring 2022-23: $51.2MAssessment Administration, Conduct, and Monitoring 2023-24: $60.1MAssessment Administration, Conduct, and Monitoring 2024-25: $59.3MAssessment Administration, Conduct, and Monitoring 2025-26: $72.1MAssessment Administration, Conduct, and Monitoring 2026-27: $62.4MAssessment Administration, Conduct, and Monitoring 2027-28: $61.9MAssessment Administration, Conduct, and Monitoring 2028-29: $21.3MAssessment Administration, Conduct, and Monitoring
Bars: spending by fiscal year (dark: actual; light: actual restated on the 2017-18 program structure; outlined: the latest plan's forecast; grey: related programs). Bands: each program in the lineage over the years it has data.
ProgramRelationYears with dataActual spending over those years
Assessment Administration, Conduct, and MonitoringThis program2021-22 – 2028-29$220M

No earlier or later program in the same department has a similar name.

Significant changes in scope and budget

Detected from the data: renames between plans, programs it appears to replace, merge with or split into (matched by name), year-over-year changes in spending of at least 25% and $5M, or in employees of at least 20% and 25 FTEs, linked budget measures, and results indicators added or dropped.

YearWhat changedSource
2023-24Indicators added: Percentage of stakeholders and Indigenous groups indicating that the Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines were effectively tailored to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the project assessmentDepartmental Results Framework (GC InfoBase)
2023-24Indicators dropped: Percentage of assessments that adhere to legislated time limitsDepartmental Results Framework (GC InfoBase)
2028-29Planned employees (FTEs) 127, against 351 in 2027-28 (−64%).FTEs (GC InfoBase)
2028-29Planned spending $21.3M, against $61.9M in 2027-28 (−66%).Latest Departmental Plan

Success criteria

The program's indicators from its department's Departmental Results Framework: the target set in each year's plan, and the result reported the following year. Source: GC InfoBase.

Historical: targets against results

Percentage of stakeholders and Indigenous groups indicating that the Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines were effectively tailored to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the project assessment
Expected result: Assessments are conducted in a manner perceived (by stakeholders, Indigenous groups, and the public) to be predictable and efficient
70%2024-25– no result

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2023-24—2024—
Results for this indicator are not yet available as the data analysis is only expected to be implemented in 2024–25. IAAC supports the development of Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines, which ensure federal requirements are captured and which take into account comments from Indigenous communities, public, federal authorities and provincial ministries, and the proponent. IAAC sought comments thr…
No result reported
2024-25≥ 70%2024—
IAAC supports the development of Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines, which ensure federal requirements are captured and which consider comments from Indigenous communities, the public, federal authorities, provinces, and the proponent. IAAC sought comments through consultation meetings, public information sessions, and invitations to submit written comments. IAAC considered comments received an…
No result reported
Percentage of assessments that adhere to legislated time limits
Expected result: Timely and predictable assessment processes
100%2021-22✓ met100%2022-23✓ met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2021-22≥ 100%2022100%Met
2022-23≥ 100%2023100%
The Impact Assessment Act (IAA) has a number of legislated time limits throughout the impact assessment process. In 2022-23, seven projects adhered to the legislated time limits in the IAA. Five projects exited the Planning phase within the 180-day time limit set out under the IAA. In addition, the Minister of the Environment and Climate Change issued the decision statement for Cedar LNG Facility…
Met

Current: the 2026-27 plan's targets

Percentage of stakeholders and Indigenous groups indicating that the Tailored Impact Statement Guidelines were effectively tailored to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the project assessment
Expected result: Assessments are conducted in a manner perceived (by stakeholders, Indigenous groups, and the public) to be predictable and efficient
70%2026-27

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2026-27≥ 70%2027—Planned

Future goals: targets due after 2026-27

No targets with a later due date.

Spending and employees: planned against actual

Spending

2021-22: $59.4M2021-22: $49M2021-222022-23: $60.4M2022-23: $51.2M2022-232023-24: $62.3M2023-24: $60.1M2023-242024-25: $66.7M2024-25: $59.3M2024-252025-26: $72.1M2025-262026-27: $62.4M2026-272027-28: $61.9M2027-282028-29: $21.3M2028-29
Outlined bar: planned in that year's Departmental Plan (dashed: the latest plan, for years not yet reported). Filled bar: actual.
Show the numbers
Fiscal yearPlannedActual
2021-22$59.4M$49M
2022-23$60.4M$51.2M
2023-24$62.3M$60.1M
2024-25$66.7M$59.3M
2025-26$72.1M—
2026-27$62.4M—
2027-28$61.9M*—
2028-29$21.3M*—

Employees (FTEs)

2021-22: 3312021-22: 3132021-222022-23: 3172022-23: 3102022-232023-24: 3732023-24: 3552023-242024-25: 3992024-25: 3782024-252025-26: 3902025-262026-27: 3612026-272027-28: 3512027-282028-29: 1272028-29
Outlined bar: planned in that year's Departmental Plan (dashed: the latest plan, for years not yet reported). Filled bar: actual.
Show the numbers
Fiscal yearPlannedActual
2021-22331313
2022-23317310
2023-24373355
2024-25399378
2025-26390—
2026-27361—
2027-28351*—
2028-29127*—

Planned spending, plan by plan

Each row is one year's Departmental Plan and its forecast for the next three fiscal years; read a column down to see how the forecast for one year changed. The last row is what was actually spent. Click an amount for its source. Biggest changes in federal spending plans

Actual spending is from Departmental Results Reports and the Public Accounts, as published in GC InfoBase. FTEs are full-time equivalents.