Canada Spends Logo

Explore our Budget 2026 analysis

Program directory · Impact Assessment Agency of Canada

Assessment Delivery

Program code
BGV02 (CEAA)
Core responsibility
Impact Assessment
In Departmental Plans
2018-19 – 2020-21 · Appeared and later dropped

What it does

This program ensures that high quality assessments of designated projects are conducted and completed in a timely and predictable way, thereby preventing or reducing adverse effects while supporting economic growth. The Agency will work with other jurisdictions to avoid duplication of assessment activities to increase efficiency and provide certainty for all participants in the process. The Agency will promote, monitor, and verify compliance with the Impact Assessment Act. The Agency will ensure that the assessment process provides for the meaningful participation of the public and Indigenous groups. The Agency will consult with Indigenous groups during the assessment process to assess how the proposed project may adversely impact potential or established Indigenous or treaty rights and related interests, and to find ways to avoid or minimize these adverse impacts. This program uses funding from the following transfer payments: the Participant Funding Program, Policy Dialogue, Indigenous Capacity Support, and the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement.

Source: the department's Program Inventory, via GC InfoBase.

History and lineage

First appears in GC InfoBase's actual spending by program in 2018-19. The data does not record when a program was created; it may be older than its first appearance here, which is limited by the sources (program spending starts in 2010-11, Departmental Plans in 2018-19).

2018-192019-202020-212021-222022-23Assessment Delivery 2018-19: $30MAssessment Delivery 2019-20: $34.4MAssessment Delivery 2020-21: $36.9MAssessment Delivery 2021-22: $39.3MAssessment Delivery 2022-23: $39.6MAssessment DeliveryEnvironmental Assessment D…Assessment De…
Bars: spending by fiscal year (dark: actual; light: actual restated on the 2017-18 program structure; outlined: the latest plan's forecast; grey: related programs). Bands: each program in the lineage over the years it has data. The line at the bottom shows this program's names over time.
ProgramRelationYears with dataActual spending over those years
Assessment DeliveryThis program2018-19 – 2022-23$101M

No earlier or later program in the same department has a similar name.

Significant changes in scope and budget

Detected from the data: renames between plans, programs it appears to replace, merge with or split into (matched by name), year-over-year changes in spending of at least 25% and $5M, or in employees of at least 20% and 25 FTEs, linked budget measures, and results indicators added or dropped.

YearWhat changedSource
2019-20Employees (FTEs) 229, against 189 in 2018-19 (+21%).FTEs (GC InfoBase)
2020-21Renamed from “Environmental Assessment Delivery” to “Assessment Delivery”.GC InfoBase program names by year

Success criteria

The program's indicators from its department's Departmental Results Framework: the target set in each year's plan, and the result reported the following year. Source: GC InfoBase.

Historical: targets against results

Percentage of assessments in which Indigenous peoples have participated.
Expected result: The public and Indigenous peoples meaningfully participate in assessments.
100%2019-20✓ met100%2020-21✓ met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2019-20≥ 100%2020100%Met
2020-21≥ 100%2021100%Met
Percentage of assessments in which the public and stakeholders have participated.
Expected result: The public and Indigenous peoples meaningfully participate in assessments.
100%2019-20✓ met100%2020-21✓ met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2019-20≥ 100%2020100%Met
2020-21≥ 100%2021100%Met
Percentage of assessments where the public and Indigenous peoples have taken advantage of participant funding offered.
Expected result: Increase capacity for participation in assessments.
100%2019-20✓ met91%2020-21✓ met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2019-20≥ 90%2020100%Met
2020-21≥ 90%202191%Met
Percentage of projects in which mitigation measures have proven to be effective.
Expected result: Minimize adverse effects of projects.
100%2019-20✓ met100%2020-21✓ met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2019-20≥ 90%2020100%Met
2020-21≥ 90%2021100%Met
Percentage of projects that are in compliance with decision statement conditions.
Expected result: Non-compliant proponents are identified and brought into compliance.
90%2019-20✓ met92%2020-21✓ met

Bars: result reported. Dashed line: target.

Report yearTargetDueResultStatus
2019-20≥ 90%202090%Met
2020-21≥ 90%202192%Met

Current: the 2026-27 plan's targets

No indicators in the 2026-27 plan.

Future goals: targets due after 2026-27

No targets with a later due date.

Spending and employees: planned against actual

Spending

2018-19: $23.5M2018-19: $30M2018-192019-20: $36M2019-20: $34.4M2019-202020-21: $38.2M2020-21: $36.9M2020-212021-22: $39.3M2021-222022-23: $39.6M2022-23
Outlined bar: planned in that year's Departmental Plan (dashed: the latest plan, for years not yet reported). Filled bar: actual.
Show the numbers
Fiscal yearPlannedActual
2018-19$23.5M$30M
2019-20$36M$34.4M
2020-21$38.2M$36.9M
2021-22$39.3M*—
2022-23$39.6M*—

Employees (FTEs)

2018-19: 1802018-19: 1892018-192019-20: 2642019-20: 2292019-202020-21: 2682020-21: 2562020-212021-22: 2702021-222022-23: 2702022-23
Outlined bar: planned in that year's Departmental Plan (dashed: the latest plan, for years not yet reported). Filled bar: actual.
Show the numbers
Fiscal yearPlannedActual
2018-19180189
2019-20264229
2020-21268256
2021-22270*—
2022-23270*—

Planned spending, plan by plan

Each row is one year's Departmental Plan and its forecast for the next three fiscal years; read a column down to see how the forecast for one year changed. The last row is what was actually spent. Click an amount for its source. Biggest changes in federal spending plans

Actual spending is from Departmental Results Reports and the Public Accounts, as published in GC InfoBase. FTEs are full-time equivalents.